Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1165038
| From | Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict with XFS |
| Date | 2015-06-15 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pBvKN-3hf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pBjgB-1Ef-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/14/2015 06:48 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> It appears that, at some point last year, XFS made directory handling
> changes which bring it into lockdep conflict with shmem_zero_setup():
> it is surprising that mmap() can clone an inode while holding mmap_sem,
> but that has been so for many years.
>
> Since those few lockdep traces that I've seen all implicated selinux,
> I'm hoping that we can use the __shmem_file_setup(,,,S_PRIVATE) which
> v3.13's commit c7277090927a ("security: shmem: implement kernel private
> shmem inodes") introduced to avoid LSM checks on kernel-internal inodes:
> the mmap("/dev/zero") cloned inode is indeed a kernel-internal detail.
>
> This also covers the !CONFIG_SHMEM use of ramfs to support /dev/zero
> (and MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS). I thought there were also drivers
> which cloned inode in mmap(), but if so, I cannot locate them now.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Sorry for the long delay. It took me a while to figure out my original
setup. I could verify that this patch made the lockdep message go away
on 4.0-rc6 and also on 4.1-rc8.
For the record: SELinux needs to be enabled triggering it.
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict with XFS Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org> - 2015-06-15 08:10 +0200 Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict with XFS Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2015-06-16 22:30 +0200 Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict with XFS Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2015-06-18 02:30 +0200
csiph-web