Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1165005
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification |
| Date | 2015-06-15 06:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pBtJ0-8R-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From experimentation and from looking at the sources, it appears that the signature checking is only done in the kexec_file_load(2) system all, and not in the kexec_load(2) system call. And I understand why -- the signature is not sent from userspace to the kernel in the older kexec_load(2) system call. The problem is that if you use an old version of kexec, it will use the old kexec_load(2) system call, and even though CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, kexec_load(2) will happily load an unsigned kernel, and then "kexec -e" will happily boot into it. Correct me if I am wrong, but this appears to be a hole in Secure Boot you could drive a Mack Truck through. (I noticed this because Debian is still using a kexec-tools from the stone ages, version 2.0.7, and I was wondering **why** I was able to kexec boot completely unsigned kernels.) It would appear to me that if CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, the old kexec_load(2) system call should be disabled (and a warning be placed in the Kconfig help that the user should have at least verision 2.X of kexec-tools if they enable this kernel option). Am I missing something? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 06:00 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 22:10 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-06-16 21:50 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2015-06-16 22:30 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-18 03:20 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-18 04:10 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-19 08:30 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-19 10:20 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2015-06-19 15:10 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-19 09:10 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2015-06-19 15:10 +0200
Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-06-18 03:30 +0200
csiph-web