Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1164540

Re: [RFC PATCH v7 23/37] perf tools: Introduce llvm config options

From pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v7 23/37] perf tools: Introduce llvm config options
Date 2015-06-13 06:40 +0200
Message-ID <pALoB-23T-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pApR7-4oZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pApR9-4oZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pAJwu-83z-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



发自我的 iPhone

> 在 2015年6月13日,上午10:31,Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> 写道:
> 
>> On 6/11/15 10:35 PM, Wang Nan wrote:
>>         # Path to clang. If omit, search it from $PATH.
>>    clang-path = "/path/to/clang"
> 
> I think this bit and search_program() from the next patch is
> overly flexible. It's always delicate to search file paths.

About this clang-path: in my environment the name of clang is x86_64-oe-linux-clang, and installed in /usr/bin/llvm-3.7, neither in $PATH nor has its default name. This is the default setting of yocto and open-embedded based systems. Please see do_install part in building script of it:

https://github.com/openembedded/meta-oe/blob/master/meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/llvm.inc

Therefore, I think something like this option should not be dropped, or people like me have to do some nasty work to make it useable. Could you please rethink it?

Thank you.

> Unless this is really needed, I would drop this bit.
> popen() in the next patch executes clang via shell,
> so explicit PATH search in unnecessary.
> 
> The rest of the patches look good to me.
> Thanks again.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH v7 23/37] perf tools: Introduce llvm config options pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com> - 2015-06-13 06:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v7 23/37] perf tools: Introduce llvm config options Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-06-13 06:50 +0200

csiph-web