Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1163112
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCHv6 29/36] thp: implement split_huge_pmd() |
| Date | 2015-06-11 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pA7rd-1YG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pxkkW-7sr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pxkuD-7Ey-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/03/2015 07:06 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Original split_huge_page() combined two operations: splitting PMDs into
> tables of PTEs and splitting underlying compound page. This patch
> implements split_huge_pmd() which split given PMD without splitting
> other PMDs this page mapped with or underlying compound page.
>
> Without tail page refcounting, implementation of split_huge_pmd() is
> pretty straight-forward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
[...]
> +
> + if (atomic_add_negative(-1, compound_mapcount_ptr(page))) {
> + /* Last compound_mapcount is gone. */
> + __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ANON_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES);
> + if (PageDoubleMap(page)) {
> + /* No need in mapcount reference anymore */
> + ClearPageDoubleMap(page);
> + for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++)
> + atomic_dec(&page[i]._mapcount);
> + }
> + } else if (!TestSetPageDoubleMap(page)) {
> + /*
> + * The first PMD split for the compound page and we still
> + * have other PMD mapping of the page: bump _mapcount in
> + * every small page.
> + * This reference will go away with last compound_mapcount.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++)
> + atomic_inc(&page[i]._mapcount);
The order of actions here means that between TestSetPageDoubleMap() and
the atomic incs, anyone calling page_mapcount() on one of the pages not
processed by the for loop yet, will see a value lower by 1 from what he
should see. I wonder if that can cause any trouble somewhere, especially
if there's only one other compound mapping and page_mapcount() will
return 0 instead of 1?
Conversely, when clearing PageDoubleMap() above (or in one of those rmap
functions IIRC), one could see mapcount inflated by one. But I guess
that's less dangerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCHv6 29/36] thp: implement split_huge_pmd() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-06-11 12:00 +0200 Re: [PATCHv6 29/36] thp: implement split_huge_pmd() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-06-22 13:20 +0200
csiph-web