Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #1944
| From | Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io |
| Date | 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BWiVj-2GF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BWiLE-2nz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Ganneff |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 16082 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote: > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the > body > who has the power to issue nontechnical statements. > > https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md > is a statement which I believe Debian as a project, and not just > individual > Debian developers, should consider signing on to. > This is a proposal for Debian to sign on to the statement, by adopting > the > text from that open letter via GR. Seconded. > > ==== Text of GR ==== > > The Debian Project co-signs the statement regarding Richard Stallman's > readmission to the FSF seen at > https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md. > The text of this statement is given below. > > Richard M. Stallman, frequently known as RMS, has been a dangerous > force in > the free software community for a long time. He has shown himself to > be > misogynist, ableist, and transphobic, among other serious accusations > of > impropriety. These sorts of beliefs have no place in the free > software, > digital rights, and tech communities. With his recent reinstatement > to the > Board of Directors of the Free Software Foundation, we call for the > entire > Board of the FSF to step down and for RMS to be removed from all > leadership > positions. > > We, the undersigned, believe in the necessity of digital autonomy and > the > powerful role user freedom plays in protecting our fundamental human > rights. > In order to realize the promise of everything software freedom makes > possible, there must be radical change within the community. We > believe in > a present and a future where all technology empowers – not oppresses – > people. We know that this is only possible in a world where > technology is > built to pay respect to our rights at its most foundational levels. > While > these ideas have been popularized in some form by Richard M. Stallman, > he > does not speak for us. We do not condone his actions and opinions. > We do > not acknowledge his leadership or the leadership of the Free Software > Foundation as it stands today. > > There has been enough tolerance of RMS’s repugnant ideas and behavior. > We > cannot continue to let one person ruin the meaning of our work. Our > communities have no space for people like Richard M. Stallman, and we > will > not continue suffering his behavior, giving him a leadership role, or > otherwise holding him and his hurtful and dangerous ideology as > acceptable. > > We are calling for the removal of the entire Board of the Free > Software > Foundation. These are people who have enabled and empowered RMS for > years. > They demonstrate this again by permitting him to rejoin the FSF Board. > It > is time for RMS to step back from the free software, tech ethics, > digital > rights, and tech communities, for he cannot provide the leadership we > need. > We are also calling for Richard M. Stallman to be removed from all > leadership positions, including the GNU Project. > > We urge those in a position to do so to stop supporting the Free > Software > Foundation. Refuse to contribute to projects related to the FSF and > RMS. > Do not speak at or attend FSF events, or events that welcome RMS and > his > brand of intolerance. We ask for contributors to free software > projects to > take a stand against bigotry and hate within their projects. While > doing > these things, tell these communities and the FSF why. > > We have detailed several public incidents of RMS's behavior. Some of > us > have our own stories about RMS and our interactions with him, things > that > are not captured in email threads or on video. We hope you will read > what > has been shared and consider the harm that he has done to our > community and > others. > > ==== End Text of GR ==== > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a > Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the > world. > Ubuntu Developer > https://www.debian.org/ > slangasek@ubuntu.com > vorlon@debian.org -- bye, Joerg
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:00 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2021-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Colin Tuckley <colin@tuckley.org> - 2021-03-24 22:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Nicolas Dandrimont <olasd@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2021-03-24 22:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:50 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:50 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Colin Tuckley <colin@tuckley.org> - 2021-03-24 22:50 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 23:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2021-03-24 22:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-03-25 20:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-03-25 20:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 22:50 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-03-25 20:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io "Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)" <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 08:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-25 18:50 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-25 19:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2021-03-25 19:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-26 12:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-25 21:20 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-25 21:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 21:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 01:40 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2021-03-25 20:30 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2021-03-27 01:10 +0100
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Michael Lustfield <michael@lustfield.net> - 2021-03-28 05:20 +0200
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2021-03-28 12:20 +0200
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Michael Lustfield <michael@lustfield.net> - 2021-03-28 16:50 +0200
csiph-web