Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #2059
| From | Richard Laager <rlaager@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms |
| Date | 2021-03-26 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BWQaB-7np-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BWPRg-7fB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWPRg-7fB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWQ0V-7jf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 3/26/21 3:19 AM, Timo Weingärtner wrote: > ---8<---8<---8<--- > The Debian Project will not issue a public statement on whether Richard > Stallman should be removed from leadership positions or not. > > Any individual (including Debian members) is free to issue such statements or > (co-)sign any open letter. > ---8<---8<---8<--- At the moment, there is only one option with enough seconds. How is voting FOR your proposal different from voting AGAINST the current proposal? Or, if more proposals gain enough seconds, how is voting FOR this option different from voting AGAINST all options that issue a statement one way or the other? I understand that mechanically they are different: this one issues a statement that we won't issue a statement either way. But, in your view, why is that desirable? Why should I vote FOR your proposal (or why should I second it)? -- Richard
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner <tiwe@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:20 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2021-03-26 09:20 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner <timo@tiwe.de> - 2021-03-26 09:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Richard Laager <rlaager@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:40 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-26 10:20 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle <m9s@mailbox.org> - 2021-03-26 11:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-26 11:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 11:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner <tiwe@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 14:40 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2021-03-26 17:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 18:20 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 19:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 20:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 01:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms "Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 10:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 10:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle <mbehrle@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 12:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 20:40 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle <m9s@mailbox.org> - 2021-03-27 21:20 +0100
Re: Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Calum McConnell <calumlikesapplepie@gmail.com> - 2021-03-26 20:20 +0100
Re: Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-26 20:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner <tiwe@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 12:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle <mbehrle@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 12:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-27 12:40 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 12:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 16:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms "Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 16:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> - 2021-03-28 10:50 +0200
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> - 2021-03-28 16:40 +0200
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org> - 2021-03-31 00:50 +0200
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 20:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 21:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms "Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 22:10 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 18:40 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:20 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-03-27 13:10 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner <tiwe@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 14:00 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-03-27 14:10 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Ulrike Uhlig <ulrike@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 14:50 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-27 17:30 +0100
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org> - 2021-03-27 16:30 +0100
csiph-web