Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #219764 > unrolled thread

HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print.

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 14:50 +0100
    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 15:00 +0100
    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-03-04 15:10 +0100
      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 15:30 +0100
        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-03-04 16:00 +0100
        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> - 2020-03-04 16:30 +0100
          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 16:50 +0100
            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 17:10 +0100
              Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 17:30 +0100
                Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 18:20 +0100
                  Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:00 +0100
                    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:40 +0100
    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-03-04 15:10 +0100
      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 15:30 +0100
        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-03-04 15:50 +0100
          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 16:10 +0100
            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. ad44@cityscape.co.uk - 2020-03-04 17:00 +0100
              Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 17:30 +0100
                Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 17:30 +0100
                  Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:00 +0100
                    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:30 +0100
                      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:30 +0100
                      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 20:40 +0100
                        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-04 21:00 +0100
                          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-04 22:10 +0100
                            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-05 00:30 +0100
                              Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 08:30 +0100
                                Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-05 12:30 +0100
                                  Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 13:10 +0100
                                    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-05 13:30 +0100
                                      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 13:40 +0100
                                        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-05 16:30 +0100
                                          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 18:10 +0100
                                            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-03-05 19:00 +0100
                                              Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 19:20 +0100
                                        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-03-05 18:10 +0100
                                          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-05 18:30 +0100
                                            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version  corrected) Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2020-03-05 18:40 +0100
            Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-03-04 17:40 +0100
    Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Markus Schönhaber <debian-user@list-post.mks-mail.de> - 2020-03-06 10:50 +0100
      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-06 12:10 +0100
        Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-03-06 14:10 +0100
          Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-06 14:40 +0100
      Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print. Markus Schönhaber <debian-user@list-post.mks-mail.de> - 2020-03-10 13:10 +0100

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#219764 — HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.0 and can no longer print.

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello All,

Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?  The upgrade resulted
in me not being able to print anything.  Jobs were, apparently, being
sent to the printer (its display panel lit up, to indicate that there
was something about to happen), but the jobs never completed and
eventually timed out with a communication error.

The installed version (3.19.12) hp-check report concludes thus;

Missing Required Dependencies
-----------------------------
error: 'cups' package is missing or 'cups' service is not running.
error: 'libcups2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libjpeg62-turbo-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcups2-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'cups-bsd' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'cups-client' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcupsimage2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcupsimage2-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libusb-1.0.0-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libsane-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libsnmp-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'snmp' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-pyqt4' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'gtk2-engines-pixbuf' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libtool' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libtool-bin' package is missing/incompatible 

Missing Optional Dependencies
-----------------------------
error: 'avahi-utils' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-notify2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-dbus.mainloop.qt' package is missing/incompatible 

and from 3.20.0;

Missing Required Dependencies
-----------------------------
error: 'cups' package is missing or 'cups' service is not running.
error: 'libcups2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libjpeg62-turbo-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcups2-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'cups-bsd' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'cups-client' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcupsimage2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libcupsimage2-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libusb-1.0.0-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libsane-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libsnmp-dev' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'snmp' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-pyqt4' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'gtk2-engines-pixbuf' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libtool' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'libtool-bin' package is missing/incompatible 

Missing Optional Dependencies
-----------------------------
error: 'avahi-utils' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-notify2' package is missing/incompatible 
error: 'python3-dbus.mainloop.qt' package is missing/incompatible 

IOW, they're identical.

The report that CUPS is missing / non-functional strikes me as weird,
because it *is* installed and runs.  Again, despite the report, cups-bsd
and cups-client are both installed.  I even tried installing as many of
the missing packages as possible when running 3.20.0 to no avail.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Bet you thought you had it all worked out
Problem - Sex Pistols

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#219765 — Re: HPLIP - upgrade to 3.20.2 and can no longer print. (version corrected)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:44:55 +0000
Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> wrote:

Hello All,

Mea Culpa - that should be version 3.20.2

All other details remain the same.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Well well well, you just can't tell
My Michelle - Guns 'N' Roses

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219766

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2020-03-04 at 08:44, Brad Rogers wrote:

> Hello All,
> 
> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?  The upgrade
> resulted in me not being able to print anything.  Jobs were,
> apparently, being sent to the printer (its display panel lit up, to
> indicate that there was something about to happen), but the jobs
> never completed and eventually timed out with a communication error.

I don't have hplip installed (which is a bit surprising, I had thought
that I did), but this post brought to mind a changelog message I saw in
a semi-recent upgrade.

Checking ~/mbox for the key word I half-remembered finds that it was in
the upgrade of cups to 2.3.1-5. The changelog entry for that version
reads:

>> cups (2.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
>> 
>>   * Move towards driverless-centered installation:
>>     - Drop all printer-driver-* and hplip recommends/suggests
>>   * Cleanup all versions from pre- Debian stable
>>   * Bump S-V to 4.5.0 without changes needed
>> 
>>  -- Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>  Fri, 07 Feb 2020 17:08:48 +0100

and because of that plus this:

<snip>

> The report that CUPS is missing / non-functional strikes me as
> weird, because it *is* installed and runs.  Again, despite the
> report, cups-bsd and cups-client are both installed.  I even tried
> installing as many of the missing packages as possible when running
> 3.20.0 to no avail.

I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in cups,
rather than in hplip.

I haven't actually had occasion to try printing since that package
upgrade, so I don't know whether it's produced any behavior change on my
end.

-- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219769

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote:

Hello The,

>I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in cups,
>rather than in hplip.

Thanks for the pointer.  Frankly, I have no idea what the change in CUPS
means.  That is, what are the implications WRT to hplip?

Should I be removing hplip, for example?

If yes, that would be a pity, since hplip has some features I find
useful, though not essential.  I can, for example, simply walk to the
printer to find out about ink levels, but it's nice to be able to do
that job without moving from the desk.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
You're only 29 got a lot to learn
Seventeen - Sex Pistols

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219772

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 15:18:47)
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
> The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in 
> >cups, rather than in hplip.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer.  Frankly, I have no idea what the change in 
> CUPS means.  That is, what are the implications WRT to hplip?
> 
> Should I be removing hplip, for example?

I recommend to file a bugreport, which also means you get feedback from 
those maintaining the package.

I recommend to file the issue against the package where you experienced 
it - hplip - it is easy later reassign as needed.

It is nice, however, that you mention in the bugreport how you've been 
suggested this possible relationship with CUPS.


> If yes, that would be a pity, since hplip has some features I find 
> useful, though not essential.  I can, for example, simply walk to the 
> printer to find out about ink levels, but it's nice to be able to do 
> that job without moving from the desk.

Share your concerns with those who can actually act on this: The Debian 
maintainers of the package you are concerned about: I.e. consider file a 
(low severity) bugreport against cups raising your concerns about 
weakened user experience.  Phrase is constructively and friendly - if it 
is perceived as "whining" (regardless of whether that was your 
intention) then there's obviously a higher risk that the bugreport will 
be dismissed without proper reflection.


Kind regards,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219776

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:18:47PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:03:04 -0500
> The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> Hello The,
> 
> >I wonder whether this might therefore be the result of a change in cups,
> >rather than in hplip.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer.  Frankly, I have no idea what the change in CUPS
> means.  That is, what are the implications WRT to hplip?

There are none. The hplip package simply ceases to be a recommends of
other packages.

> Should I be removing hplip, for example?

No. Perhaps. It depends on what your printer model is. It is traditional
to offer such information when discussing printing matters.

> If yes, that would be a pity, since hplip has some features I find
> useful, though not essential.  I can, for example, simply walk to the
> printer to find out about ink levels, but it's nice to be able to do
> that job without moving from the desk.

Inconsequential as regards the major purpose of HPLIP.

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219777

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:27:12 +0000
Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> wrote:

Hello Brian,

>There are none. The hplip package simply ceases to be a recommends of
>other packages.

Thanks for the info.

>> Should I be removing hplip, for example?  
>No. Perhaps. It depends on what your printer model is. It is traditional
>to offer such information when discussing printing matters.

This is why I'd be no good at bug triaging, etc.  I consistently
overlook the obvious.   :-(

The printer is an OfficeJet 6700 Premium (an all in one device).

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
You're a sidewalk cipher speaking prionic jive
Give You Nothing - Bad Religion

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219781

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:40:57PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> 
> The printer is an OfficeJet 6700 Premium (an all in one device).

Thanks.

With the 6700 on the network provide what you get for

  avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp

and

  avahi-browse -rt _uscan._tcp

avahi-browse is in the avahi-utils package.

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219785

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:08:38 +0000
Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

Hello Brian,

>  avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp

Output is in the attached file to avoid (hopefully) horrendous word wrap
issues.

>  avahi-browse -rt _uscan._tcp

Results in no output.  However, about 1 second passes before the command
prompt reappears, so something occurs.

I'll reiterate that currently, the working (v3.19.12) hplip is
installed, in case it's relevant.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Bet you thought you knew what I was about
Problem - Sex Pistols

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219789

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:23:16PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:08:38 +0000
> 
> Hello Brian,

Hello Brad,
 
> >  avahi-browse -rt _ipp._tcp
> 
> Output is in the attached file to avoid (hopefully) horrendous word wrap
> issues.

The output is from the DNS-SD broadcasts made by a CUPS server. This
isn't quite what I meant by having the printer on the network. I assume
the printer is USB-connected to the server. Strictly speaking, it is the
server that is on the network, not the printer.

For a useful output, wireless would have to activated on the printer and
it would have to connect to a wireless access point.
 
> >  avahi-browse -rt _uscan._tcp
> 
> Results in no output.  However, about 1 second passes before the command
> prompt reappears, so something occurs.

This tells you the server is not a scanning device! T'would be surprising
if it was.

> I'll reiterate that currently, the working (v3.19.12) hplip is
> installed, in case it's relevant.

It wasn't relevant for this.

-- 
Brian








> -- 
>  Regards  _
>          / )           "The blindingly obvious is
>         / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
> Bet you thought you knew what I was about
> Problem - Sex Pistols

> +   eth0 IPv6 Officejet_6700_fax @ abydos                   Internet Printer     local
> +   eth0 IPv6 Officejet_6700 @ abydos                       Internet Printer     local
> +   eth0 IPv4 Officejet_6700_fax @ abydos                   Internet Printer     local
> +   eth0 IPv4 Officejet_6700 @ abydos                       Internet Printer     local
> =   eth0 IPv6 Officejet_6700_fax @ abydos                   Internet Printer     local
>    hostname = [abydos.local]
>    address = [2001:8b0:234:2417:e7fe:43c:2aae:82ec]
>    port = [631]
>    txt = ["printer-type=0x6" "printer-state=3" "TLS=1.2" "UUID=fd0f955d-6e5c-3ab5-4a03-70ffdd14295f" "URF=DM3" "pdl=application/postscript" "product=Unknown" "priority=0" "adminurl=https://abydos.local.:631/printers/Officejet_6700_fax" "ty=Unknown" "rp=printers/Officejet_6700_fax" "qtotal=1" "txtvers=1"]
> =   eth0 IPv6 Officejet_6700 @ abydos                       Internet Printer     local
>    hostname = [abydos.local]
>    address = [2001:8b0:234:2417:e7fe:43c:2aae:82ec]
>    port = [631]
>    txt = ["printer-type=0x901E" "printer-state=3" "Duplex=T" "Color=T" "TLS=1.2" "UUID=25e0e91d-ed46-3c21-4c9d-c3c5a3700194" "URF=DM3" "pdl=application/octet-stream,application/pdf,application/postscript,image/jpeg,image/png,image/pwg-raster,image/urf" "product=(HP Officejet 6700 Premium E-all-in-one printer-h711n)" "priority=0" "note=" "adminurl=https://abydos.local.:631/printers/Officejet_6700" "ty=HP Officejet 6700, hpcups 3.20.2" "rp=printers/Officejet_6700" "qtotal=1" "txtvers=1"]
> =   eth0 IPv4 Officejet_6700_fax @ abydos                   Internet Printer     local
>    hostname = [abydos.local]
>    address = [192.168.1.99]
>    port = [631]
>    txt = ["printer-type=0x6" "printer-state=3" "TLS=1.2" "UUID=fd0f955d-6e5c-3ab5-4a03-70ffdd14295f" "URF=DM3" "pdl=application/postscript" "product=Unknown" "priority=0" "adminurl=https://abydos.local.:631/printers/Officejet_6700_fax" "ty=Unknown" "rp=printers/Officejet_6700_fax" "qtotal=1" "txtvers=1"]
> =   eth0 IPv4 Officejet_6700 @ abydos                       Internet Printer     local
>    hostname = [abydos.local]
>    address = [192.168.1.99]
>    port = [631]
>    txt = ["printer-type=0x901E" "printer-state=3" "Duplex=T" "Color=T" "TLS=1.2" "UUID=25e0e91d-ed46-3c21-4c9d-c3c5a3700194" "URF=DM3" "pdl=application/octet-stream,application/pdf,application/postscript,image/jpeg,image/png,image/pwg-raster,image/urf" "product=(HP Officejet 6700 Premium E-all-in-one printer-h711n)" "priority=0" "note=" "adminurl=https://abydos.local.:631/printers/Officejet_6700" "ty=HP Officejet 6700, hpcups 3.20.2" "rp=printers/Officejet_6700" "qtotal=1" "txtvers=1"]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219797

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:12:00 +0000
Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

Hello Brian,

>isn't quite what I meant by having the printer on the network. I assume
>the printer is USB-connected to the server. Strictly speaking, it is the

The printer is connected via ethernet, rather than USB.

>For a useful output, wireless would have to activated on the printer and
>it would have to connect to a wireless access point.

I can connect the printer wirelessly, if necessary.

Thank you for your patience.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Does she always shout at you, does she tell you what to do
Family Life - Sham 69

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219805

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:53:10PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:12:00 +0000
> Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> >isn't quite what I meant by having the printer on the network. I assume
> >the printer is USB-connected to the server. Strictly speaking, it is the
> 
> The printer is connected via ethernet, rather than USB.
> 
> >For a useful output, wireless would have to activated on the printer and
> >it would have to connect to a wireless access point.
> 
> I can connect the printer wirelessly, if necessary.
> 
> Thank you for your patience.

Thank you for your responsiveness.

What I am probing is not at all central to your issue, but it is useful
to know and may give you another way of printing.

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219767

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Brad,

Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 14:44:55)
> Is anybody else having issues with hplip 3.20.0?

Please mention when you use testing/unstable.

When you do use testing/unstable then please check yourself for reported 
bugs before asking here.

Also, please mention if you have suppressed installation of recommended 
packages.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219768

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:00:39 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:

Hello Jonas,

>Please mention when you use testing/unstable.

Of course.  Stupid of me;  I'm on testing, and there are no reports at
Debian's hplip page.  Nor can I find reports at the HP hplip support
site.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
You're all invited to a party, you don't even have to come
Get The Funk Out - Extreme

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219771

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Quoting Brad Rogers (2020-03-04 15:20:00)
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:00:39 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:
> >Please mention when you use testing/unstable.
> I'm on testing, and there are no reports at Debian's hplip page.  Nor 
> can I find reports at the HP hplip support site.

Thanks for clarifying.  Yes, the two bugs filed today relates only to 
unstable, and your explicitly omitting details about suppressed 
recommended packages must mean that you have none of that.

This seems an excellent case of an issue that needs reporting.

Please do file this as a bug in Debian.

Thanks for bringing it up here first.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219774

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:47:45 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:

Hello Jonas,

>Thanks for clarifying.  Yes, the two bugs filed today relates only to 

I was too wrapped up in details to see the blindingly obvious....

>unstable, and your explicitly omitting details about suppressed 
>recommended packages must mean that you have none of that.

....I don't routinely install recommended packages.  AFAICS, the
recommends for hplip relate mostly to scanning, rather than printing so
probably not relevant.  Of course, I'm no expert.

Should I still go ahead and file a report?

>Thanks for bringing it up here first.

I prefer to ask around first, just in case I'm doing something wrong.
DD's have enough on their plates already without having to deal with my
being the PEBKAC.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
We're going to hell anyway, let's travel first class
Saturday Night - Kaiser Chiefs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219778

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:04:07PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:47:45 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:
> 
> Should I still go ahead and file a report?
> 
> >Thanks for bringing it up here first.
> 
> I prefer to ask around first, just in case I'm doing something wrong.
> DD's have enough on their plates already without having to deal with my
> being the PEBKAC.

Execute (as root):

cupsfilter -p /etc/cups/ppd/XXX.ppd -m printer/foo -e /etc/nsswitch.conf > out.dat 2>log

and post the contents of log here. XXX is the PPD name for your printer.
Only you know its name.

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219782

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:51:18 +0000
ad44@cityscape.co.uk wrote:

Hello ad44@cityscape.co.uk,

>Execute (as root):
>cupsfilter -p /etc/cups/ppd/XXX.ppd -m printer/foo -e
>/etc/nsswitch.conf > out.dat 2>log

I'll point out that this is with the 3.19.12 (i.e. things working)
version of hplip installed, so may not be useful.

cupsfilter: File "/usr/lib/cups/filter/hpcups" permissions OK (040755/uid=0/gid=0).
DEBUG: argv[0]="cupsfilter"
DEBUG: argv[1]="1"
DEBUG: argv[2]="root"
DEBUG: argv[3]="nsswitch.conf"
DEBUG: argv[4]="1"
DEBUG: argv[5]=""
DEBUG: argv[6]="/etc/nsswitch.conf"
DEBUG: envp[0]="<CFProcessPath>"
DEBUG: envp[1]="CONTENT_TYPE=text/plain"
DEBUG: envp[2]="CUPS_DATADIR=/usr/share/cups"
DEBUG: envp[3]="CUPS_FONTPATH=/usr/share/cups/fonts"
DEBUG: envp[4]="CUPS_SERVERBIN=/usr/lib/cups"
DEBUG: envp[5]="CUPS_SERVERROOT=/etc/cups"
DEBUG: envp[6]="LANG=en_GB.UTF8"
DEBUG: envp[7]="PATH=/usr/lib/cups/filter:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin"
DEBUG: envp[8]="PPD=/etc/cups/ppd/Officejet_6700.ppd"
DEBUG: envp[9]="PRINTER_INFO=cupsfilter"
DEBUG: envp[10]="PRINTER_LOCATION=Unknown"
DEBUG: envp[11]="PRINTER=cupsfilter"
DEBUG: envp[12]="RIP_MAX_CACHE=128m"
DEBUG: envp[13]="USER=root"
DEBUG: envp[14]="CHARSET=utf-8"
DEBUG: envp[15]="FINAL_CONTENT_TYPE=application/vnd.cups-raster"
INFO: texttopdf (PID 23941) started.
INFO: pdftopdf (PID 23942) started.
INFO: gstoraster (PID 23943) started.
INFO: hpcups (PID 23944) started.
DEBUG: OUTFORMAT="(null)", so output format will be CUPS/PWG Raster
STATE: -marker-supply-low-warning
DEBUG: pdftopdf: Last filter determined by the PPD: hpcups; FINAL_CONTENT_TYPE: application/vnd.cups-raster => pdftopdf will not log pages in page_log.
DEBUG: Page = 595x842; 9,9 to 586,833
INFO: texttopdf (PID 23941) exited with no errors.
DEBUG: PDF interactive form and annotation flattening done via QPDF
INFO: pdftopdf (PID 23942) exited with no errors.
DEBUG: Color Manager: Calibration Mode/Off
DEBUG: Calling FindDeviceById(cups-cupsfilter)
DEBUG: Failed to send: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:The name org.freedesktop.ColorManager was not provided by any .service files
DEBUG: Failed to get find device cups-cupsfilter
DEBUG: Calling FindDeviceById(cups-cupsfilter)
DEBUG: Failed to send: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:The name org.freedesktop.ColorManager was not provided by any .service files
DEBUG: Failed to get device cups-cupsfilter
INFO: Color Manager: no profiles specified in PPD
DEBUG: Color Manager: ICC Profile: None
DEBUG: Ghostscript using Any-Part-of-Pixel method to fill paths.
DEBUG: Ghostscript command line: gs -dQUIET -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dNOINTERPOLATE -dNOMEDIAATTRS -dShowAcroForm -sstdout=%stderr -sOutputFile=%stdout -sDEVICE=cups -sMediaType=Plain -sOutputType=0 -r600x600 -dMediaPosition=1 -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841 -dcupsBitsPerColor=8 -dcupsColorOrder=0 -dcupsColorSpace=17 -dcupsInteger0=26 -scupsPageSizeName=A4 -I/usr/share/cups/fonts -c '<</.HWMargins[9.360000 9.360000 9.359985 9.359985] /Margins[0 0]>>setpagedevice' -f -_
DEBUG: envp[0]="<CFProcessPath>"
DEBUG: envp[1]="CONTENT_TYPE=text/plain"
DEBUG: envp[2]="CUPS_DATADIR=/usr/share/cups"
DEBUG: envp[3]="CUPS_FONTPATH=/usr/share/cups/fonts"
DEBUG: envp[4]="CUPS_SERVERBIN=/usr/lib/cups"
DEBUG: envp[5]="CUPS_SERVERROOT=/etc/cups"
DEBUG: envp[6]="LANG=en_GB.UTF8"
DEBUG: envp[7]="PATH=/usr/lib/cups/filter:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin"
DEBUG: envp[8]="PPD=/etc/cups/ppd/Officejet_6700.ppd"
DEBUG: envp[9]="PRINTER_INFO=cupsfilter"
DEBUG: envp[10]="PRINTER_LOCATION=Unknown"
DEBUG: envp[11]="PRINTER=cupsfilter"
DEBUG: envp[12]="RIP_MAX_CACHE=128m"
DEBUG: envp[13]="USER=root"
DEBUG: envp[14]="CHARSET=utf-8"
DEBUG: envp[15]="FINAL_CONTENT_TYPE=application/vnd.cups-raster"
INFO: Start rendering...
INFO: Processing page 1...
PAGE: 1 1
INFO: Processing page 2...
INFO: Rendering completed
INFO: gstoraster (PID 23943) exited with no errors.
INFO: hpcups (PID 23944) exited with no errors.


-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Shut it up you silly cow
Golden Green - Wonder Stuff

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219783

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:13:05PM +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:51:18 +0000
> ad44@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
> 
> Hello ad44@cityscape.co.uk,
> 
> >Execute (as root):
> >cupsfilter -p /etc/cups/ppd/XXX.ppd -m printer/foo -e
> >/etc/nsswitch.conf > out.dat 2>log
> 
> I'll point out that this is with the 3.19.12 (i.e. things working)
> version of hplip installed, so may not be useful.

It's useful in that it shows a fully functioning filtering system for
3.19.12, but a log for 3.20.2 is what is really required.

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#219799

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:29:11 +0000
Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

Hello Brian,

>It's useful in that it shows a fully functioning filtering system for
>3.19.12, but a log for 3.20.2 is what is really required.

Attached is the output for when 3.20.2 is installed.

AFAICS, the only differences are the order in which some of the output
statements appear in the two logs.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Just coz they do it in the movies, doesn't mean to say that it's cool
Keep It Clean - The Vibrators

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web