Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211093 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-09 18:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-07-10 06:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-09 18:00 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-09 18:10 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-07-09 18:20 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-09 18:30 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-07-09 19:10 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster) kdall99@runbox.com - 2019-07-09 19:00 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2019-07-10 01:50 +0200
Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-07-10 06:10 +0200
| From | bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster |
| Message-ID | <yi0H9-5f7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
>Bw, 9.7.2019 14:13 +0200: > > In-Reply-To: <[????] 5D24796D.5050709@sbcglobal.net> > >Could you please stop this nonsense? You break every thread you >participate in. "In-Reply-To" is a message *header* field and as such >(surprise!) belongs into the header section of the message and not into >it's body, where you insist on putting it. > >Again: please stop this nonsense! No Problem, Sorry To Offend... how's this look to ya? I would subscribe, but there is a lot of (pointless) mail and I have limited bandwidth. Until broadband is lower than my electric bill I am stuck with 500MB per month. Maybe you could spam/filter out my address permanently? L8r, bw
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yi0QN-5xE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211093 |
Hi. On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:36:14AM -0400, bw wrote: > >Bw, 9.7.2019 14:13 +0200: > > > > In-Reply-To: <[????] 5D24796D.5050709@sbcglobal.net> > > > >Could you please stop this nonsense? You break every thread you > >participate in. "In-Reply-To" is a message *header* field and as such > >(surprise!) belongs into the header section of the message and not into > >it's body, where you insist on putting it. > > > >Again: please stop this nonsense! > > No Problem, Sorry To Offend... how's this look to ya? Much better. Please keep it this way from now on, many of the readers of this list will appreciate it. Helps with the archive's consistency. ktnxbye, Reco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yi10t-5AN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211093 |
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 11:36 -0400, bw wrote: > > Bw, 9.7.2019 14:13 +0200: > > > > In-Reply-To: <[????] 5D24796D.5050709@sbcglobal.net> > > > > Could you please stop this nonsense? You break every thread you > > participate in. "In-Reply-To" is a message *header* field and as > > such > > (surprise!) belongs into the header section of the message and not > > into > > it's body, where you insist on putting it. > > > > Again: please stop this nonsense! > > No Problem, Sorry To Offend... how's this look to ya? Still broken because there is no 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' email header. You've just removed it from the body text. (I'm not the person who complained this time but I did in the past.) -- Tixy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yi1a9-5DQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211095 |
Hi. On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Tixy wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 11:36 -0400, bw wrote: > > > Bw, 9.7.2019 14:13 +0200: > > > > > > In-Reply-To: <[????] 5D24796D.5050709@sbcglobal.net> > > > > > > Could you please stop this nonsense? You break every thread you > > > participate in. "In-Reply-To" is a message *header* field and as > > > such > > > (surprise!) belongs into the header section of the message and not > > > into > > > it's body, where you insist on putting it. > > > > > > Again: please stop this nonsense! > > > > No Problem, Sorry To Offend... how's this look to ya? > > Still broken because there is no 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' email > header. You've just removed it from the body text. (I'm not the person > who complained this time but I did in the past.) I see it in that e-mail: In-Reply-To: <2df0e302-4068-c81b-ffa7-b6cac0535aa9@runbox.com> You mean you got the e-mail without it? PS There's no References indeed. Reco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yi1MR-66q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211096 |
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 19:21 +0300, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Tixy wrote: [...] > > Still broken because there is no 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' > > email > > header. You've just removed it from the body text. (I'm not the > > person > > who complained this time but I did in the past.) > > I see it in that e-mail: > > In-Reply-To: <2df0e302-4068-c81b-ffa7-b6cac0535aa9@runbox.com> > > You mean you got the e-mail without it? Correct, no In-Reply-To in the email I got, and the lists archives don't show it as a reply to any other post... https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/07/msg00584.html And threaded list here shows it as a new top level post https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/07/thrd2.html -- Tixy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kdall99@runbox.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-09 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: please stop breaking threads (was: Problem Installing DiscoveryStudio2019 in Buster) |
| Message-ID | <yi1Db-5NE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211093 |
Bw, 9.7.2019 17:36 +0200: > No Problem, Sorry To Offend... how's this look to ya? Hm, not sending an In-Reply-To header at all doesn't help - you've just started *another* new thread. Put In-Reply-To in the message header where it belongs. Then - and only then - it will enable the mail clients of all the subscribers of this list to automatically know to which posting you replied to. > I would subscribe, but there is a lot of (pointless) mail and I have > limited bandwidth. Until broadband is lower than my electric bill I am stuck with > 500MB per month. OK, understood. But does the limitation *you* have to live with justify that you break threads for *all other* members of the list? Maybe you could resume doing what you did 'till Oct 2018, when you did put the In-Reply-To header where it belongs: <https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/alpine.DEB.2.20.1810192036590.7736@debian> > Maybe you could spam/filter out my address permanently? I could. But that would only help if no one ever replied to one of your replies. With every single one of you replies you create a new thread - regardless if I see it's root or filter it - since you've detached the (sub-)thread from it's origin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-10 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yi81X-1eP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211093 |
On 9 de julho de 2019 11:36, bw wrote: > I would subscribe, but there is a lot of (pointless) mail and I have > limited bandwidth. Until broadband is lower than my electric bill I am stuck with > 500MB per month. Any decent mail client should be able to download only metadata for messages (subject, etc), which is minimal amounts of data, and only fetching the actual bodies of the ones you want.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-10 06:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yic5A-3Uw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211120 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Ma, 09 iul 19, 16:53:40, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > On 9 de julho de 2019 11:36, bw wrote: > > I would subscribe, but there is a lot of (pointless) mail and I have > > limited bandwidth. Until broadband is lower than my electric bill I am stuck with > > 500MB per month. > > Any decent mail client should be able to download only metadata for > messages (subject, etc), which is minimal amounts of data, and only > fetching the actual bodies of the ones you want. That sounds very much like IMAP, which I'm using as well with imapfilter, neomutt and a GMX account dedicated to receiving list e-mail only (virtually spam-free, knock on wood). Gmail also offers IMAP, but their... unique implementation requires special handling in neo/mutt. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web