Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #205234 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-12 15:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2019-02-13 22:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 31 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:20 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-02-12 15:40 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:50 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-02-12 16:00 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 19:00 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2019-02-12 19:50 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 20:10 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 00:30 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager mett <mett@pmars.jp> - 2019-02-15 05:00 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 06:00 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 09:10 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager ghe <ghe@slsware.net> - 2019-02-12 15:50 +0100
Glenn -> Re: WiFi without Network Manager deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> - 2019-02-12 17:20 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager ghe <ghe@slsware.net> - 2019-02-12 21:10 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> - 2019-02-13 14:40 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 14:50 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-02-13 15:20 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 17:40 +0100
Re: WiFi without Network Manager mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:00 +0100
Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> - 2019-02-13 14:50 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-02-13 14:50 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> - 2019-02-13 15:00 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-02-13 15:20 +0100
Thanks Dan. Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> - 2019-02-13 15:40 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-02-13 22:20 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-02-13 22:30 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-02-13 22:50 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-02-14 05:20 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-02-13 22:30 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-02-14 05:30 +0100
Re: Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-02-13 22:30 +0100
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 15:20 +0100 |
| Subject | WiFi without Network Manager |
| Message-ID | <xqH4K-57L-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties". That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a "Local Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with. Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud complaining" by Network Manager. What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring up WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, for the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces). Thank you! Kenneth Parker (eyeblinkuniverse.com)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqHo5-5dT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205234 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties".
> That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a "Local
> Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with.
>
> Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud complaining"
> by Network Manager.
>
> What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring up
> WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, for
> the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces).
Actually ifupdown is perfectly capable of doing the work (well, it just
orchestrates it, but it commes with all the necessary scripts for that).
Here's my stanza in /etc/network/interfaces (passphrase somewhat decorated,
to protect the innocent):
iface wlan0 inet dhcp
wpa-ssid dubcek
wpa-psk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
That's all it is needed for ifup to set up wlan0, go out with DHCP and
fetch an IP address from our local DHCP server.
Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual
magic behind the scenes.
Enjoy simple life :-)
Cheers
-- t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqHxL-5hf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205235 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties". > > That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a "Local > > Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with. > > > > Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud > complaining" > > by Network Manager. > > > > What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring up > > WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, > for > > the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces). > > Actually ifupdown is perfectly capable of doing the work (well, it just > orchestrates it, but it commes with all the necessary scripts for that). > > Here's my stanza in /etc/network/interfaces (passphrase somewhat decorated, > to protect the innocent): > > iface wlan0 inet dhcp > wpa-ssid dubcek > wpa-psk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > That's all it is needed for ifup to set up wlan0, go out with DHCP and > fetch an IP address from our local DHCP server. > > Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual > magic behind the scenes. > Which part is "interactive", asking me for WiFi and Password? Wpasupplicant? Thanks! > > Enjoy simple life :-) > > Cheers > -- t > Indeed. Debian Always! Kenneth Parker (eyeblinkuniverse.com)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqHHs-5kB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205236 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:44:47AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties". [...] > > Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual > > magic behind the scenes. > > > > Which part is "interactive", asking me for WiFi and Password? > Wpasupplicant? Thanks! There's no interactive part. I just invoke "sudo ifup wlan0" on console (this is because I have neither "auto wlan0" nor "allow-hotplug wlan0" on my /etc/network/interfaces: I actually want to decide whether to wlan or not) -- and seconds later I have a connection. That's all. Cheers -- t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqKvD-72i-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205238 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 9:59 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:44:47AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan > Parties". > > [...] > > > > Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual > > > magic behind the scenes. > > > > > > > Which part is "interactive", asking me for WiFi and Password? > > Wpasupplicant? Thanks! > > There's no interactive part. I just invoke "sudo ifup wlan0" on console > (this is because I have neither "auto wlan0" nor "allow-hotplug wlan0" > on my /etc/network/interfaces: I actually want to decide whether to > wlan or not) -- and seconds later I have a connection. That's all. > What gives you the list of potential WiFi hosts, to choose from? (These LAN Parties may be at a Coffee House I haven't been to before). That's what I meant by "Interactive". > > Cheers > -- t > Thanks! Kenneth Parker >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 19:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqLi1-7xA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205243 |
On ter, 12 fev 2019, Kenneth Parker wrote: > What gives you the list of potential WiFi hosts, to choose from? (These > LAN Parties may be at a Coffee House I haven't been to before). > > That's what I meant by "Interactive". So you want something that does exactly what NetworkManager does, but is not NetworkManager? There's wicd, which is similar. I don't know of any others. -- Eduardo M KALINOWSKI eduardo@kalinowski.com.br
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 20:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqLBo-7To-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205244 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 1:42 PM Eduardo M KALINOWSKI < eduardo@kalinowski.com.br wrote: > On ter, 12 fev 2019, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > What gives you the list of potential WiFi hosts, to choose from? (These > > LAN Parties may be at a Coffee House I haven't been to before). > > > > That's what I meant by "Interactive". > > So you want something that does exactly what NetworkManager does, but > is not NetworkManager? > > There's wicd, which is similar. I don't know of any others. > NetworkManager does what I want, but is too much of a Control Freak (even approaching Autocratic). I don't have much experience with wicd, but have heard good things about it. > Perhaps I should check out the Source for nm and wicd: That should give me the "how", and Code Samples. -- > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI > eduardo@kalinowski.com.br Thanks! Kenneth Parker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 00:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xryC5-4vD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205235 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties". > > That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a "Local > > Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with. > > > > Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud > complaining" > > by Network Manager. > > > > What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring up > > WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, > for > > the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces). > > Actually ifupdown is perfectly capable of doing the work (well, it just > orchestrates it, but it commes with all the necessary scripts for that). > > Here's my stanza in /etc/network/interfaces (passphrase somewhat decorated, > to protect the innocent): > > iface wlan0 inet dhcp > wpa-ssid dubcek > wpa-psk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > That's all it is needed for ifup to set up wlan0, go out with DHCP and > fetch an IP address from our local DHCP server. > > Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual > magic behind the scenes. > What did you have to do, the first time? When you were determining the Network Name (wpa-ssid)? (Having to know everything in advance isn't too cool, when you visit multiple Coffee Houses. And connecting to the wrong ssid could get you into some *SERIOUS* trouble!) I am doing my own investigation, by the way, finding general information on a "competing" Distro (Arch): https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WPA_supplicant This site suggests that wpa_cli gives useful information, so I will see what that looks like, and then use your interfaces method. Enjoy simple life :-) > > Cheers > -- t > Thanks! Kenneth Parker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mett <mett@pmars.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 05:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xrCPn-6Xe-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205341 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2019年2月15日 8:23:04 JST, Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: >> > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan >Parties". >> > That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a >"Local >> > Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with. >> > >> > Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud >> complaining" >> > by Network Manager. >> > >> > What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to >bring up >> > WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can >run, >> for >> > the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using >/etc/network/interfaces). >> >> Actually ifupdown is perfectly capable of doing the work (well, it >just >> orchestrates it, but it commes with all the necessary scripts for >that). >> >> Here's my stanza in /etc/network/interfaces (passphrase somewhat >decorated, >> to protect the innocent): >> >> iface wlan0 inet dhcp >> wpa-ssid dubcek >> wpa-psk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >> That's all it is needed for ifup to set up wlan0, go out with DHCP >and >> fetch an IP address from our local DHCP server. >> >> Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual >> magic behind the scenes. >> > >What did you have to do, the first time? When you were determining the >Network Name (wpa-ssid)? (Having to know everything in advance isn't >too >cool, when you visit multiple Coffee Houses. And connecting to the >wrong >ssid could get you into some *SERIOUS* trouble!) > >I am doing my own investigation, by the way, finding general >information >on a "competing" Distro (Arch): > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WPA_supplicant > >This site suggests that wpa_cli gives useful information, so I will >see >what that looks like, and then use your interfaces method. > >Enjoy simple life :-) >> >> Cheers >> -- t >> > >Thanks! > >Kenneth Parker sudo iwlist wlan0 scan <https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/wi-fi-command-line>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 06:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xrDLr-7v4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205350 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:54 PM mett <mett@pmars.jp> wrote: > On 2019年2月15日 8:23:04 JST, Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:30 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote: >>> > I occasionally run, what I will describe as "Coffee House Lan Parties". >>> > That means I connect to the Internet via WiFi, and then supply a "Local >>> > Ethernet" network (with ipv4), for others to connect with. >>> > >>> > Doing this with Network Manager "worked", but only with "loud >>> complaining" >>> > by Network Manager. >>> > >>> > What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring >>> up >>> > WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, >>> for >>> > the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces). >>> >>> Actually ifupdown is perfectly capable of doing the work (well, it just >>> orchestrates it, but it commes with all the necessary scripts for that). >>> >>> Here's my stanza in /etc/network/interfaces (passphrase somewhat >>> decorated, >>> to protect the innocent): >>> >>> iface wlan0 inet dhcp >>> wpa-ssid dubcek >>> wpa-psk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >>> >>> That's all it is needed for ifup to set up wlan0, go out with DHCP and >>> fetch an IP address from our local DHCP server. >>> >>> Of course it relies on wpasupplicant and dhclient to do the actual >>> magic behind the scenes. >>> >> >> What did you have to do, the first time? When you were determining the >> Network Name (wpa-ssid)? (Having to know everything in advance isn't too >> cool, when you visit multiple Coffee Houses. And connecting to the wrong >> ssid could get you into some *SERIOUS* trouble!) >> >> I am doing my own investigation, by the way, finding general information >> on a "competing" Distro (Arch): >> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WPA_supplicant >> >> This site suggests that wpa_cli gives useful information, so I will see >> what that looks like, and then use your interfaces method. >> >> Enjoy simple life :-) >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- t >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Kenneth Parker >> > > sudo iwlist wlan0 scan > Many Thanks. Just what I needed! <https://www.linuxjournal.comcontent/wi-fi-command-line > <https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/wi-fi-command-line>> > And thanks for the link. If they're still in business, they are worth my Subscription! Kenneth Parker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xrGJj-15G-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205353 |
Hello, - As a GUI alternative to NetworkManager; Wicd has been mentionned, but there is also Connman - the GUI part of NetworkManager (the gnome applet: network-manager-gnome) is not mandatory: there are TUI (nmtui) and CLI (nmcli) interfaces included in the NetworkManager base package (network-manager) - In my opinion, it would probably be simpler to use only NetworkManager than NetworkManager and /etc/interfaces in your use case
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ghe <ghe@slsware.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqHxL-5hf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205234 |
On 2/12/19 7:10 AM, Kenneth Parker wrote: > What I want now, are the "steps" that Network Manager takes, to bring up > WiFi, so I can create an "in-demand" Root-level Script that I can run, > for the WiFi part. (The rest works fine, using /etc/network/interfaces). How about (a non-auto entry from my interfaces file): # wlan0 -- Get DHCP from Comcast and tidy up a bit iface wlan0 inet dhcp wpa-ssid <SSID> wpa-psk <password> post-up /etc/sls/comcastRoutes.sh comcastRoutes.sh is a shell script that fixes the routing table and resolv.conf to set the default and DNS back to non-comcast IPs and to enter some routes -- I use this for big downloads from the mirrors, etc. "ifup wlan0" or "ifconfig wlan0 up" bring it up. And they don't turn off my T1 Ethernet connection. -- Glenn English
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 17:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Glenn -> Re: WiFi without Network Manager |
| Message-ID | <xqIWR-6fk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205237 |
On 2/12/2019 9:46 AM, ghe wrote: > comcastRoutes.sh is a shell script that fixes the routing table and > resolv.conf to Glenn, thanks for this! Is there much to comcastRoutes.sh and resolv.conf that would require scrubbing so that you might be able to share these? (I'm on comcast as well; and I want to set this up too.) Thanks (still installing 9.7 ...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ghe <ghe@slsware.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xqMxr-8to-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205241 |
On 2/12/19 9:15 AM, deb wrote: > Glenn, thanks for this! More than welcome. For your amazement, here's the comcastRoutes.sh from my laptop, running Buster. This is run just after the WiFi interface has been brought up and Comcast has scribbled all over my IP files. It looks like maybe I'm removing the default the twice on the WiFi... #! /bin/bash echo 'Adding Comcast routes' route del default route add default gw <theDefaultOnMyT1> # Debian mirrors: # picosecond route add -host 184.105.204.138 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 # U-CHICAGO route add -host 128.135.10.29 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 # MIT route add -host 128.30.2.26 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 # Georgia Tech route add -host 128.61.240.89 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 # Wikimedia route add -host 208.80.154.15 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 route del default wlan0 route del -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 cp -a /etc/resolv.conf.sls /etc/resolv.conf -- Glenn English
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xr2VA-1A2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205248 |
note: this is why I think top-posting is best. People don't have to scroll through tons of crap to get to "Thanks" :-) On 2/12/2019 3:07 PM, ghe wrote: > On 2/12/19 9:15 AM, deb wrote: > >> Glenn, thanks for this! > More than welcome. > > For your amazement, here's the comcastRoutes.sh from my laptop, running > Buster. This is run just after the WiFi interface has been brought up > and Comcast has scribbled all over my IP files. It looks like maybe I'm > removing the default the twice on the WiFi... > > #! /bin/bash > > echo 'Adding Comcast routes' > route del default > route add default gw <theDefaultOnMyT1> > > # Debian mirrors: > # picosecond > route add -host 184.105.204.138 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 > # U-CHICAGO > route add -host 128.135.10.29 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 > # MIT > route add -host 128.30.2.26 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 > # Georgia Tech > route add -host 128.61.240.89 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 > # Wikimedia > route add -host 208.80.154.15 gw 10.0.0.1 wlan0 > > route del default wlan0 > route del -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > cp -a /etc/resolv.conf.sls /etc/resolv.conf Thank you! I'll give that a crack!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xr35f-1DA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205279 |
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 08:32:22 AM deb wrote: > note: this is why I think top-posting is best. > > People don't have to scroll through tons of crap to get to "Thanks" :-) I vary the use of top-posting and "bottom"-posting depending on circumstances. For thanks and similar, top posting works very well. In dealing with some other groups or "types" of people, top-posting works well (because, in many cases, it is what they expect or are used to). On lists that prefer "bottom"-posting, I try to ususally comply, with exceptions. In either case, I advocate quite extensive eliding of irrelevant parts of a post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xr3yi-22O-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205282 |
deb wrote: > note: this is why I think top-posting is best. People don't have to > scroll through tons of crap to get to "Thanks" :-) When I open a message on a mailing list or newsgroup and see nothing but quoted text I usually just move on to the next message. On the other hand I find top-posted responses that remain cryptic until I've scrolled through a hundred lines of mostly-irrelevant quoted text a bit irritating too. It's better not to post "Thanks" to a busy mailing list. If you must do so please put "Thanks" in the subject line. rhkramer writes: > I vary the use of top-posting and "bottom"-posting depending on > circumstances. > ... > On lists that prefer "bottom"-posting, I try to ususally comply, with > exceptions. > In either case, I advocate quite extensive eliding of irrelevant parts > of a post. I elide as required and interleave my response. I recall only one instance of someone objecting (on Usenet many years ago.) -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xr5JM-3hY-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205291 |
On 2/13/19 9:14 AM, John Hasler wrote: s better not to post "Thanks" to a busy mailing list. If you must do > so please put "Thanks" in the subject line. OR "solved", which is much more useful for the next guy. No need for "thanks" as "solved" is the ultimate goal for posterity. It's what I look for in a google search to click on. Ric
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xr3eV-1GP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205279 |
On 2019-02-13 13:32, deb wrote: > note: this is why I think top-posting is best. > > People don't have to scroll through tons of crap to get to "Thanks" :-) <snipped> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- Key ID 4BFEBB31
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deb <deb@rangingthoughts.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Swap space choice on a SSD <- Current best practice on? |
| Message-ID | <xr35f-1DA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #205248 |
Hello folks: Again -- fussing with a full (not from a live .iso) 9.7 install; the Debian GUI installer is suggesting a Swap partition on a Kingston SSD. #1 Given that it's not great to pound the same area of a SSD with writes; is it indeed still best practice to go with a swap partition on a SSD rather than a swap FILE? (Or is this a legacy spinning hard disk install suggestion?) #2 How DO you get the installer to go with a Swap FILE? Just delete that recommended Swap partition during the install? I looked; but did not run across any best practice docs for Swap on SSD. Thank you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web