Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #205158 > unrolled thread

Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-02-10 09:50 +0100
    Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-02-12 17:40 +0100
      Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2019-02-12 20:20 +0100
        Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-02-13 08:50 +0100
        Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi chris <tknchris@gmail.com> - 2019-03-21 17:40 +0100

#205158 — Re: Systemd files on a Raspberry Pi

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> 
> 
> On 22/06/2015 11:49 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> writes:
> >> If it quacks like a duck, it's a .... duck, plain and simple.
> >> 
> >> I absolutely agree with the post that systemd is a "cancer"
> > 
> > And I think Debian can do fine without people who only contribute
> > toxic behaviour. And yes, calling other projects a cancer is just
> > that.
> 
> It has all the hallmarks of cancer, growing beyond itself to the
> potential death of that which it has invaded.

No. Ansgar is right here (and I say that as someone who dislikes
systemd and is not really happy about it being the default in
Debian).

Disparaging other people/projects just because you don't like them
is /not/ the way to go. Systemd is free software: thanks, systemd!

If the likes of you invested half the energy you waste flinging
mud at the systemd project/people into keeping SysV (or any of
its alternatives) viable, world would be a better place.

And yes, mud has come from the other side too, but at the moment
I've the clear impression that the trolls are winning in the
anti-systemd camp. I don't feel well there.

Let's be glad MikeeeUSA went away and please, don't try to replace
him.

Cheers
-- tomás

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#205242

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:

Did I miss 4 years of posts or did you (accidentally?) reply to a 4
year old message?

-- 

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205246

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

On 13/2/19 3:14 am, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan
>> wrote:
> 
> Did I miss 4 years of posts or did you (accidentally?) reply to a
> 4 year old message?

No, there was a new message in relation to a recent video at Linux
Conf 2019..... and the discussion sparked up again in relation to that.

Cheers
A.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXGMXIQAKCRCoFmvLt+/i
+w3nAP0XVSJU88QWAiNbgFNmfSLlJDmW5+Ov4q9RGuv66ZTgBwEA2iatxjSLsOev
eac0GfhP5ro8djVJ6ixxBrPTwbAREec=
=Lh8d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205260

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:57:44AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 13/2/19 3:14 am, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan
> >> wrote:
> > 
> > Did I miss 4 years of posts or did you (accidentally?) reply to a
> > 4 year old message?
> 
> No, there was a new message in relation to a recent video at Linux
> Conf 2019..... and the discussion sparked up again in relation to that.

Zombies don't die, you know ;-)

(and lest this gets mis-interpreted, I just mean the bad feelings
on /all/ "camps")

Cheers
-- t

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206428

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

the resistance is still strong ...

Systemd-Free Debian "Devuan" Planning Their First Developer Gathering This
Spring
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Devuan-Conference-2019

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:15 PM Andrew McGlashan <
andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> On 13/2/19 3:14 am, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan
> >> wrote:
> >
> > Did I miss 4 years of posts or did you (accidentally?) reply to a
> > 4 year old message?
>
> No, there was a new message in relation to a recent video at Linux
> Conf 2019..... and the discussion sparked up again in relation to that.
>
> Cheers
> A.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXGMXIQAKCRCoFmvLt+/i
> +w3nAP0XVSJU88QWAiNbgFNmfSLlJDmW5+Ov4q9RGuv66ZTgBwEA2iatxjSLsOev
> eac0GfhP5ro8djVJ6ixxBrPTwbAREec=
> =Lh8d
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web