Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tech <tech@rkn.ovh> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 46 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-09 19:50 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:20 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-10 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-10 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" cyaiplexys <cyaiplexys@sitesplace.net> - 2018-08-10 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-10 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-12 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 10:40 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 22:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-23 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2018-08-09 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-08-23 23:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 08:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 09:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-24 21:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-24 22:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 23:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 02:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 17:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 00:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-29 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 03:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 19:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-31 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-09-04 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 19:50 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-05 04:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-05 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:50 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-04 21:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-09-04 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 19:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 02:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-30 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-30 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-30 01:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 22:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-02 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-09-02 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-03 07:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-09-03 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 07:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-03 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-29 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 13:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 05:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-24 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-24 18:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 19:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-25 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-27 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-27 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-25 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-08-25 02:50 +0200
Re: mailing list is the future (corrected spelling mistakes) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-08-09 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2018-08-11 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-12 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-08-10 10:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-10 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-11 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-13 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-08-11 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-10-04 10:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wse0N-3ch-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199589 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 11:33:48 John Hasler wrote: > Gene writes: > > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > > cleaned out with a web browser... > > Why in hell are you using that provider? This is WV. Its the only game in the area. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-30 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wshrH-52h-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199609 |
Gene writes: > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > cleaned out with a web browser... I wrote: > Why in hell are you using that provider? Gene writes: > This is WV. Its the only game in the area. Your ISP needn't be your email provider. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-30 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wshBo-55t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199609 |
On Wed 29 Aug 2018 at 15:07:31 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 11:33:48 John Hasler wrote: > > > Gene writes: > > > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > > > cleaned out with a web browser... > > > > Why in hell are you using that provider? > > This is WV. Its the only game in the area. That's why I agreed with tomás in the other thread. (You replied to my post with "I've had the same physical address for 29 years this fall.") With your own domain, you are independent of the ISP's own email service, and if you don't like the software on your email server, you can transfer your domain to a host that gives you better service with satisfactory software. I selected my host on the basis of their service (availability and usage limits) and the server (IMAP, encrypted), so it would be pointless to have my emails forwarded to another hosting service (eg my ISP) as suggested with Gandi (in the same thread). That's despite the fact that they're rather a long way away. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtivn-5M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199552 |
About this ISP that prevents fetchmail from deleting messages after they're downloaded, may one ask, "Cui bono?" How is it in their interest to provide this um feature? -- Poobah
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtl0e-1nH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199688 |
On Saturday 01 September 2018 13:54:40 Bob Bernstein wrote: > About this ISP that prevents fetchmail from deleting messages > after they're downloaded, may one ask, "Cui bono?" > > How is it in their interest to provide this um feature? It prevents the deletion of emails that the same login client, on a different box setup for imap, from losing their email corpus. And dovecot doesn't have an individual client config choice that they could enable just for the 3 or 4 of us that use fetchmail or its workalike cousins (getmail?) and keep our own email corpus in tde-kmail. I can and do clean up with a web browser as the webmail interface does let you clean it out. So I do that about daily. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtlCW-1OO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199689 |
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It prevents the deletion of emails that the same login client,
> on a different box setup for imap, from losing their email
> corpus.
This sounds like "I'm from the government. I'm here to help you
not harm yourself."
It's just more dumbing down to the lowest common denominator
Gene, and it means less freedom of choice for the glue-enabled
in order to spare the others their daily ration of embarrassment.
That's my story and I may, or may not, stick to it.
--
But at least let us have no more nonsense about defending
liberty against Fascism. If liberty means anything at all
it means the right to tell people what they do not want to
hear.
Orwell (see http://bit.ly/2MSWhoB)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtvsB-7qQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199690 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 05:22:34PM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Gene Heskett wrote: > > >It prevents the deletion of emails that the same login client, on > >a different box setup for imap, from losing their email corpus. > > This sounds like "I'm from the government. I'm here to help you not > harm yourself." This is what I call "Emergent Evil". Emergent behaviour "just happens" at a higher organizational level, without the involved individuals "knowing" what they are doing. Like an anthill developing a "new" behaviour different of that of an ant. In this case, the driving force may well be that it's more hassle for the ISP to deal with the furious customer who's just lost five years of mail archives by his/her own dumb mistake than with those others grudgingly clicking their way through that (invariably horrible) Web "interface". To note, and to try to address the "cui bono"? question, the real profits go to the silos (Facebook, Microsoft, Google et al): by making mail hardly bearable, those are going to reap the benefits. Since they have some control over the mail clients too (ever used Outlook? 'Nuff said), I'm sure they do help to make the water in the well less tasty, to "help" people in the decision to buy their bottled water. It's not a downright conspiracy. It's more subtle. Those bigcorps are masters in riding this pattern I call Emergent Evil. Otherwise they wouldn't exist. > It's just more dumbing down to the lowest common denominator Gene, > and it means less freedom of choice for the glue-enabled in order to > spare the others their daily ration of embarrassment. > > That's my story and I may, or may not, stick to it. I already mentioned posteo.de and mailbox.org. I'm sure you can use IMAP there as it was intended to work. My challenge to you all: find a similar service in your country (i.e. a mail service which may cost something, but not much: e.g. around 1x minimum hourly wage in your country/year), and where *you* are the customer, not the procuct. Donation-based is also fair game. The kind of service you'd recommend your best friend. In the US, perhaps riseup.net? Post it here. Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAluLliUACgkQBcgs9XrR2kY8yQCYt9UJvOmWTJ1V1FZJniMaPwbE zwCeP4bEQUB3RyY3ElYNd0AvZfq0i9c= =FYkf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtA8V-1FH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199695 |
tomás writes: > In the US, perhaps riseup.net? I prefer newsguy.com . They are not experiencing a financial crisis and have been in business for more than twenty years. I've been satisfied with their service for most of this century. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtAsh-20X-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199699 |
On 2018-09-02, John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> wrote: > tomás writes: >> In the US, perhaps riseup.net? > > I prefer newsguy.com . They are not experiencing a financial crisis and > have been in business for more than twenty years. I've been satisfied > with their service for most of this century. This facetiously protracted OT thread kicked off by a long-gone troll has renewed my interest in the venerable STFU protocol, which might be immediately employed for this specific exchange to the utmost bandwidth-economizing effect. ;-) (kinda) -- "She understands everything, recognizes everyone, but through her half sleep, she simply cannot understand what power binds her hand and foot, oppresses her, and keeps her from living." -- Anton Chekhov, “Sleepy”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtBeF-2w2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199700 |
Curt writes: > This facetiously protracted OT thread kicked off by a long-gone troll > has renewed my interest in the venerable STFU protocol, which might be > immediately employed for this specific exchange to the utmost > bandwidth-economizing effect. Some email clients have filtering. Get one. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtBHH-2F4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199701 |
John Hasler (2018-09-02): > Some email clients have filtering. Get one. This kind of answer is despicable. You would deserve that Curt subscribes your address to all junk mail lists he can find. You would just have to filter them. Regards, -- Nicolas George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtCkq-36V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199702 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Dan Purgert (2018-09-02): > Difference is, Curt chose to subscribe to this list, which happens to > carry this thread This list is about using Debian. This thread is not. Therefore, this thread is pollution on this list. I will personally refrain from polluting further. Regards, -- Nicolas George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtDgt-3EV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199704 |
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 17:14:02 +0200 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote: > > This list is about using Debian. It's called 'debian-user'. Which of the contributors are you suggesting are not Debian users? -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtCkq-36V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199702 |
Nicolas George wrote: > John Hasler (2018-09-02): >> Some email clients have filtering. Get one. > > This kind of answer is despicable. You would deserve that Curt > subscribes your address to all junk mail lists he can find. You would > just have to filter them. > Difference is, Curt chose to subscribe to this list, which happens to carry this thread that he doesn't want to read ... and to which he told John (if not everyone participating) to STFU. The response then - "filter this out" - is perfectly valid. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtCX8-3jy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199701 |
On Sunday 02 September 2018 10:06:07 John Hasler wrote: > Curt writes: > > This facetiously protracted OT thread kicked off by a long-gone > > troll has renewed my interest in the venerable STFU protocol, which > > might be immediately employed for this specific exchange to the > > utmost bandwidth-economizing effect. > > Some email clients have filtering. Get one. + at least 1 John. TDE's kmail works pretty good. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtCX8-3jy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199701 |
On 2018-09-02, John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> wrote: > Curt writes: >> This facetiously protracted OT thread kicked off by a long-gone troll >> has renewed my interest in the venerable STFU protocol, which might be >> immediately employed for this specific exchange to the utmost >> bandwidth-economizing effect. > > Some email clients have filtering. Get one. I knew you were humorless, but this endless OT thread is spam and now represents a considerable pollutive presence in the archives. You are far from the most egregious participant but are a participant nonetheless, and more than once. Filter yourself. -- "She understands everything, recognizes everyone, but through her half sleep, she simply cannot understand what power binds her hand and foot, oppresses her, and keeps her from living." -- Anton Chekhov, “Sleepy”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtPB0-2zy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199709 |
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Curt wrote:
> You are far from the most egregious participant but are a
> participant nonetheless, and more than once.
You're *counting*?
You point the finger and accuse, but are not complicit in the
crime? This is a pose very familiar to all students of
Nuremberg.
--
But at least let us have no more nonsense about defending
liberty against Fascism. If liberty means anything at all
it means the right to tell people what they do not want to
hear.
Orwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtQdH-30Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199718 |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:21:16AM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Curt wrote: > > > You are far from the most egregious participant but are a participant > > nonetheless, and more than once. > > You're *counting*? > > You point the finger and accuse, but are not complicit in the crime? This is a > pose very familiar to all students of Nuremberg. Aaaand ... it's Gone^BGodwin's law. Oblig Simpson's clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGwZVGKG30s Oblig Nazi pug: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD_QlnY8Ggg :D Sieg Heil‼
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtPKF-2CA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199709 |
On Sunday, 2 Sep 2018 at 15:51, Curt wrote: [...] > I knew you were humorless, but this endless OT thread is spam and > now represents a considerable pollutive presence in the archives. Well, I for one, have been enjoying it (or, at least, until somebody told somebody else to STFU). I use Debian. I use mailing lists (including linux.debian.user). Doesn't seem OT to me. Chill all. -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50 & org 9.1.13 on Debian buster/sid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtUKm-5pI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199720 |
Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Sunday, 2 Sep 2018 at 15:51, Curt wrote: > > [...] > >> I knew you were humorless, but this endless OT thread is spam and >> now represents a considerable pollutive presence in the archives. > > Well, I for one, have been enjoying it (or, at least, until somebody > told somebody else to STFU). I use Debian. I use mailing lists > (including linux.debian.user). Doesn't seem OT to me. That was my take on the matter as well - or at least it was a suggestion that perhaps the debian lists "move away from these 'old' communication channels". -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web