Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tech <tech@rkn.ovh> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 46 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-09 19:50 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:20 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-10 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-10 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" cyaiplexys <cyaiplexys@sitesplace.net> - 2018-08-10 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-10 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-12 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 10:40 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 22:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-23 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2018-08-09 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-08-23 23:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 08:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 09:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-24 21:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-24 22:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 23:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 02:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 17:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 00:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-29 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 03:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 19:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-31 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-09-04 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 19:50 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-05 04:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-05 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:50 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-04 21:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-09-04 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 19:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 02:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-30 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-30 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-30 01:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 22:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-02 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-09-02 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-03 07:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-09-03 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 07:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-03 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-29 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 13:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 05:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-24 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-24 18:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 19:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-25 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-27 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-27 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-25 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-08-25 02:50 +0200
Re: mailing list is the future (corrected spelling mistakes) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-08-09 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2018-08-11 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-12 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-08-10 10:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-10 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-11 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-13 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-08-11 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-10-04 10:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtbtU-4kZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199680 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 10:54:08AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-08-29 17:06, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:01:44AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > >[...] > > > >>> Massive proprietary email providers are just such points of failure. > >> > >>True. Explain that to your neighbor and try to convince him that > >>it's a > >>good reason for him to quit using Gmail. > > > >Well, I've succeeded already with a few people moving from > >gmail/outlook > >to posteo.de. Every little bit counts. > > > > How do you send and receive emails at night when the wind isn't > blowing ? You mean, because of the renewable thing? Ever heard of electric energy storage? There are several options available... Yeah, yeah. I know. Germany's carbon footprint is less-than-stellar. Some of us are working on it, wish us luck. Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluKbB4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYBXACdHGjePuKYnq1VM5MpEQNRW/YP qdEAnifg7XAf6B2PRi1DUOfz1/7FP8Bg =eYBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsbcB-1xz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199591 |
I wrote: > I don't think it's a conspiracy. I think most people *like* > centralization. Joe writes: > But the very purpose of the Internet is to be decentralised: to avoid > a single, or even a few, points of failure. Was. Past tense. > Massive proprietary email providers are just such points of failure. True. Explain that to your neighbor and try to convince him that it's a good reason for him to quit using Gmail. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsbYZ-1MY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199590 |
On 8/29/18 11:29 AM, John Hasler wrote: > Michael Stone wrote: >> FWIW, I think SMTP (and IMAP) is on its way out as well. I expect >> that in 20 years HTTP will still be going strong [...] > tomás writes: >> Rather some Google/Amazon/Facebook/Microsoft backed abominable >> mutation of that. One that (in subtle ways) gives a competitive >> advantage to centralized services. > I think that SMTP will still be going strong but "consumers" will all > use Webmail and all but the largest organizations will either use > Webmail as well or contract for email service. You'll be free to run > your own server (but not from home: ISPs will block it) but no one will > talk to you. > > You miss the point. SMTP is for transit between servers. Maybe "consumers" prefer gmail, or yahoo, or some form of webmail - but we're never going to see a world where all mail goes through gmail - certainly not all business mail. Chances are, that most mail - at least business mail - will originate in Outlook, go through an Exchange server, and from there, travel over SMTP. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wrWGB-1fW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199523 |
On 8/28/18 5:24 PM, Mark Rousell wrote: > I was going to say that you and I have started going round in circles > and should just agree to disagree about certain things but this is a > different strand of the discussion that still seems to be advancing. > > On 28/08/2018 20:01, Michael Stone wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:46:15PM +0100, Mark Rousell wrote: >>> web forums, app-based, IM-style, etc.) but none of that, to my mind, >>> lessens >>> NNTP's ideal applicability to getting private discussion group >>> messages from >>> place to place (the front end UI/UX being a different thing again). >> >> Ignoring the changes to user requirements for UI/UX is at least part >> of why NNTP is no longer a major factor in internet usage. > Last time I looked, Thunderbird & Exchange both support news - a newsgroup looks just like another email account. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws3f4-5dU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199536 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 08:28:56PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: [...] > Last time I looked, Thunderbird & Exchange both support news - a > newsgroup looks just like another email account. And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" folks don't "get": SMTP, NNTP and IMAP are abstract (and relatively stable) interfaces which allow the development of a bunch of different clients which suit a hugely diverse user base, even as weird folks as me. User is queen: GOOD On a "web forum", me, the user, gotta put up with whatever dorky "web GUI" some random "startup" has come up with. And they often are dorky for a reason, the provider is basing its business model on this (branding, embedding ads, sucking up data, you name it). There's often a "REST interface", but it is at a much lower abstraction level as SMTP et al -- and it is a moving target: often, the server and client parts are in one repository, tied by a framework. You can change the interface spec at a whim, since the browser downloads the new client code. That means that me, as a user have to put up with whatever cruel abomination the provider has thought up for me. Provider is king: BAD. That's at least my take on it. It isn't something we all are going to agree on, as in the GPL vs BSD/MIT thing -- your opinion will depend on which side you lean towards (my "good"/"bad" above reflect my personal leanings, shouldn't you have noticed :-) Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGTDwACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ5PgCfa7itA0ldS3a+7saXnDmoO1wn dscAn0UM0kfzE/YCnpb10PHYLbkZwalF =nqgA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws5qy-6pJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199542 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 03:33:16 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 08:28:56PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > [...] > > > Last time I looked, Thunderbird & Exchange both support news - a > > newsgroup looks just like another email account. > > And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" > folks don't "get": > > SMTP, NNTP and IMAP are abstract (and relatively > stable) interfaces which allow the development of a bunch of different > clients which suit a hugely diverse user base, even as weird folks > as me. User is queen: GOOD > > On a "web forum", me, the user, gotta put up with whatever dorky > "web GUI" some random "startup" has come up with. And they often are > dorky for a reason, the provider is basing its business model on > this (branding, embedding ads, sucking up data, you name it). There's > often a "REST interface", but it is at a much lower abstraction level > as SMTP et al -- and it is a moving target: often, the server and > client parts are in one repository, tied by a framework. You can > change the interface spec at a whim, since the browser downloads the > new client code. That means that me, as a user have to put up with > whatever cruel abomination the provider has thought up for me. > Provider is king: BAD. > > That's at least my take on it. It isn't something we all are going > to agree on, as in the GPL vs BSD/MIT thing -- your opinion will > depend on which side you lean towards (my "good"/"bad" above reflect > my personal leanings, shouldn't you have noticed :-) > > Cheers > -- tomás Which is why, in this age of feeding 100 megs of advertising to the browser client before allowing the materiel clicked on to be displayed, often in a smaller more space efficient font that has you expanding your right hands reach to hit the ctrl+ + keys to expand it to easily read, this obnoxious old fart still pulls his email with fetchmail, which hands it off to procmail which then runs it past clamav and spamassassin and a few of its own recipes that end in /dev/null, and what survives is written to /var/spool/mail/gene. And /var/spool/mail is watched by inotifywait launched by a bash script I wrote called mailwatcher which when inotifywait exits with the name of the file just closed by procmail, sends the tde version of kmail a "get mail" message over dbus and fires up inotifywait to do it all over again with the next incoming message. That reduces the work I have to do to a tap of the + key to read the next message, reply to it if I can help or comment as in now, and when done adding my voice to the thread, a ctrl + RETURN sends my prose back to the list. And a tap on the + key takes me to the next unread message. Thats all about 10x easier than launching a ^@& browser, logging into the mail server and reading the crap presented, in the order of arrivasl there. But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has disabled fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I still need to log in daily and delete the crap by hand to reduce my exposure to whatever email harvesting bull crap they may do. Its not a perfect solution, but it beats webmail like a white mouthed mule when the + key is hit 500x a day. So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you can. Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other way around by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws5Ad-6HY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199547 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 05:54:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: [...] > Which is why, in this age of feeding 100 megs of advertising to the > browser client [...] ...for which NNTP would be actually very inefficient ;-D [...] > procmail, sends the tde version of kmail a "get mail" message over dbus dbus. Eeek ;-) But no, seriously: since mail is such an abstract protocol, it does allow this kind of thing. > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you can. > Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other way around > by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. So that's why you can bury us under such an amount of mails ;-P Rock on! Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGb3IACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYDIgCfTn0DV/HSpzenGrXx5KI9sd5n oeYAnjbYC+8VoPSQTYrPrajZ8iOzUm5K =17Gr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws5JU-6L7-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199548 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:03:30 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 05:54:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > [...] > > > Which is why, in this age of feeding 100 megs of advertising to the > > browser client [...] > > ...for which NNTP would be actually very inefficient ;-D > > [...] > > > procmail, sends the tde version of kmail a "get mail" message over > > dbus > > dbus. Eeek ;-) > > But no, seriously: since mail is such an abstract protocol, it does > allow this kind of thing. > > > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you > > can. Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other > > way around by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. > > So that's why you can bury us under such an amount of mails ;-P > > Rock on! > > Cheers > -- tomás Spot on Tomas. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws5JU-6L7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199547 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:05:52 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 03:33:16 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has > > disabled fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I > > still need to log in daily [...] > > > > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you > > can. Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other > > way around by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. > > Sounds a bit odd, since fetchmail can (apparently) be configured to > tell the other end to delete the mails it pulls. > > Alternately, do they provide pop3 access? Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email cleaned out with a web browser, -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws6cV-6Uj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199552 |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:05:52 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 03:33:16 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >> > [...] But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has >> > disabled fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I >> > still need to log in daily [...] >> > >> > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you >> > can. Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other >> > way around by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. >> >> Sounds a bit odd, since fetchmail can (apparently) be configured to >> tell the other end to delete the mails it pulls. >> >> Alternately, do they provide pop3 access? > > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > cleaned out with a web browser, > aww, that's stupid. Maybe connect to it with tbird for the cleanup instead? It'll at least let you go through everything without automatically downloading all the images / tracking cookies / etc. (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be tarred and feathered). -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws6wi-7fJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199557 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:05:52 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 03:33:16 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> > [...] But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has > >> > disabled fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled > >> > email, I still need to log in daily [...] > >> > > >> > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you > >> > can. Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the > >> > other way around by creating circuitous ways past the ticket > >> > taker. > >> > >> Sounds a bit odd, since fetchmail can (apparently) be configured to > >> tell the other end to delete the mails it pulls. > >> > >> Alternately, do they provide pop3 access? > > > > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > > cleaned out with a web browser, > > aww, that's stupid. > > Maybe connect to it with tbird for the cleanup instead? It'll at > least let you go through everything without automatically downloading > all the images / tracking cookies / etc. > > (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be tarred > and feathered). Emasculated would be even better. :( -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7Vn-7WD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199561 |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be tarred >> and feathered). > Emasculated would be even better. :( perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can ever go wrong" crowd. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7Vn-7WD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199576 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:25:36PM -0000, Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be tarred > >> and feathered). > > Emasculated would be even better. :( > > perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible > reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can ever > go wrong" crowd. Tarred and feathered... with <ouch>painful, pointy angle brackets</ouch>. Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGkqIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ5dQCeOWqwwHM8kzZ2bYEAoZVDwnLr +SUAnRRCzxzZ5iOIIyeBZYhSZqUEPnVp =6aGC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws8eK-83b-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199577 |
<tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:25:36PM -0000, Dan Purgert wrote: >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be tarred >> >> and feathered). >> > Emasculated would be even better. :( >> >> perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible >> reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can ever >> go wrong" crowd. > > Tarred and feathered... with <ouch>painful, pointy angle brackets</ouch>. Don't have any of those, but I do have some fiber cutoffs ew can use. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsa6R-He-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199576 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 08:25:36 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be > >> tarred and feathered). > > > > Emasculated would be even better. :( > > perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible > reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can > ever go wrong" crowd. I dunno Dan, tar does wash off, with enough kerosene or turpentine. I'd druther turn off the source of the problem so it can't make more. I guess that comes from a technical view of cause and effect. :) But I've never been accused of being too PC. ;-) -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsbcB-1xz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199588 |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 08:25:36 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be >> >> tarred and feathered). >> > >> > Emasculated would be even better. :( >> >> perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible >> reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can >> ever go wrong" crowd. > > I dunno Dan, tar does wash off, with enough kerosene or turpentine. Set the person responsible on fire then? -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wseau-3fe-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199599 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 11:53:50 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 08:25:36 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be > >> >> tarred and feathered). > >> > > >> > Emasculated would be even better. :( > >> > >> perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible > >> reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can > >> ever go wrong" crowd. > > > > I dunno Dan, tar does wash off, with enough kerosene or turpentine. > > Set the person responsible on fire then? Thats a thought, but LE would take a very dim view, and I'd druther not spend my fading time where I'd get a stripped tan. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-30 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wss3M-394-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199612 |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 11:53:50 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 08:25:36 Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be >> >> >> tarred and feathered). >> >> > >> >> > Emasculated would be even better. :( >> >> >> >> perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible >> >> reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing can >> >> ever go wrong" crowd. >> > >> > I dunno Dan, tar does wash off, with enough kerosene or turpentine. >> >> Set the person responsible on fire then? > > Thats a thought, but LE would take a very dim view, and I'd druther not > spend my fading time where I'd get a stripped tan. > "But Judge, he's the guy that facilitated the email scammers to get your banking credentials and take all your money ..." -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-30 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsu5z-4ih-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199629 |
On Thursday 30 August 2018 05:53:32 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 11:53:50 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 08:25:36 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> >> Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >> > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:37:25 Dan Purgert wrote: > >> >> >> (as an aside, whoever came up with HTML-based email should be > >> >> >> tarred and feathered). > >> >> > > >> >> > Emasculated would be even better. :( > >> >> > >> >> perhaps ... but at least tarred and feathered would be a visible > >> >> reminder to the rest of the "hey this is a great idea, nothing > >> >> can ever go wrong" crowd. > >> > > >> > I dunno Dan, tar does wash off, with enough kerosene or > >> > turpentine. > >> > >> Set the person responsible on fire then? > > > > Thats a thought, but LE would take a very dim view, and I'd druther > > not spend my fading time where I'd get a stripped tan. > > "But Judge, he's the guy that facilitated the email scammers to get > your banking credentials and take all your money ..." ROTFLMAO! -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wsaJA-18K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199552 |
Gene writes: > Yes, but fetchmails delete is ignored, so I have to keep the email > cleaned out with a web browser... Why in hell are you using that provider? -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web