Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #199592 > unrolled thread

sid upgrade problem

Started byDefault User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com>
First post2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Last post2018-09-02 06:00 +0200
Articles 8 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  sid upgrade problem Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
    Re: sid upgrade problem Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
      Re: sid upgrade problem Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 23:00 +0200
      Re: sid upgrade problem Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-09-01 03:10 +0200
        Re: sid upgrade problem Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 05:20 +0200
          Re: sid upgrade problem Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-09-01 06:40 +0200
            Re: sid upgrade problem Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-09-02 00:20 +0200
              Re: sid upgrade problem Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 06:00 +0200

#199592 — sid upgrade problem

FromDefault User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com>
Date2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Subjectsid upgrade problem
Message-ID<wsaTg-1bV-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Running sid (Debian Unstable).

For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:



user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libsane1{ab}
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libsane-common sane-utils
2 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 3,028 kB of archives. After unpacking 8,432 kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
 libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Keep the following packages at their current version:
1)     libsane-common [1.0.25-4.1 (now, unstable)]
2)     libsane1 [Not Installed]
3)     sane-utils [1.0.25-4.1 (now)]



Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]

I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve itself,
but it never does.

Insight?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#199611

FromBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Date2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
Message-ID<wseat-3fe-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199592
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> Running sid (Debian Unstable).
> For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
> updates work as normal:
> user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
> [sudo] password for default:
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>    libsane1{ab}
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>    libsane-common sane-utils
> 2 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 3,028 kB of archives. After unpacking 8,432 kB will be used.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
>   libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
> 1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>       Keep the following packages at their current version:
> 1)     libsane-common [1.0.25-4.1 (now, unstable)]
> 2)     libsane1 [Not Installed]
> 3)     sane-utils [1.0.25-4.1 (now)]
> Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
> I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve itself,
> but it never does.
> Insight?

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199619

FromDefault User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com>
Date2018-08-29 23:00 +0200
Message-ID<wsfJf-3ZK-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199611

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 15:19 Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> wrote:

> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> > Running sid (Debian Unstable).
> > For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
> > updates work as normal:
> > user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
> > [sudo] password for default:
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >    libsane1{ab}
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> >    libsane-common sane-utils
> > 2 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> > Need to get 3,028 kB of archives. After unpacking 8,432 kB will be used.
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >   libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
> >   libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
> > 1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
> > The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
> >       Keep the following packages at their current version:
> > 1)     libsane-common [1.0.25-4.1 (now, unstable)]
> > 2)     libsane1 [Not Installed]
> > 3)     sane-utils [1.0.25-4.1 (now)]
> > Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
> > I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve itself,
> > but it never does.
> > Insight?
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
> Director
> Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
> New Zealand
>
>
>
>

Hi, Ben!

Thanks for the pointer to bug information regarding this situation.

Now we just wait.

: )

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199671

FromBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Date2018-09-01 03:10 +0200
Message-ID<wt2Ah-7FB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199611
On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>   libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
>>   libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
>> 1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
[...]
>> I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve itself,
>> but it never does.
>> Insight?
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913

sane-backends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should 
soon be available on sid:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/

This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should resolve the upgrade 
problem.

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199676

FromDefault User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-01 05:20 +0200
Message-ID<wt4C6-qn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199671

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> wrote:

> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> > On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >>   libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
> >>   libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
> >> 1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
> [...]
> >> I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve
> itself,
> >> but it never does.
> >> Insight?
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913
>
> sane-backends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should
> soon be available on sid:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
>
> This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should resolve the upgrade
> problem.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
> Director
> Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
> New Zealand
>



Hi, Ben.
Thanks for the heads-up.
I'll be watching.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199677

FromBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Date2018-09-01 06:40 +0200
Message-ID<wt5Rv-15x-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199676
On 01/09/2018 15:14, Default User wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> wrote:
>> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
>>>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>>>    libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
>>>>    libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
>>>> 1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be installed
>> [...]
>>>> I always choose "Y".  I keep waiting for the situation to resolve
>> itself,
>>>> but it never does.
>>>> Insight?
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913
>> sane-backends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should
>> soon be available on sid:
>> https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
>> This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should resolve the upgrade
>> problem.
> 
> Hi, Ben.
> Thanks for the heads-up.
> I'll be watching.

I just updated to 1.0.27-1 and my scanner still works (Brother 
MFC-L2740DW over WiFi network). Note that libsane is removed and 
replaced with libsane1. Package manager insistence on removing libsane 
is by design.

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199691

FromBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Date2018-09-02 00:20 +0200
Message-ID<wtmpj-2jk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199677
On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
> Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
> Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/saned ...
> update-inetd: warning: cannot add service, /etc/inetd.conf does not exist

It looks to me that your upgrade went fine. sane-utils depends on 
update-inetd for some reason, perhaps in case you are using inetd to 
share a local scanner via your network? Like you, I do not use inetd, do 
not have inetutils-inetd installed, and do not have /etc/inetd.conf . I 
saw the same message and took it as a harmless warning.

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#199692

FromDefault User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-02 06:00 +0200
Message-ID<wtrIl-5gc-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#199691

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:13 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> wrote:

> On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
> > Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/saned ...
> > update-inetd: warning: cannot add service, /etc/inetd.conf does not exist
>
> It looks to me that your upgrade went fine. sane-utils depends on
> update-inetd for some reason, perhaps in case you are using inetd to
> share a local scanner via your network? Like you, I do not use inetd, do
> not have inetutils-inetd installed, and do not have /etc/inetd.conf . I
> saw the same message and took it as a harmless warning.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
> Director
> Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
> New Zealand
>
>

Hi, Ben.
Thanks for the reply. No, I am not using inetd to
share a local scanner via network. So, since I am not conversant with
inetd, I will just have to use my system for a while, to see if there is
something there that just doesn't seem to work, and if so, just take it
from there.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web