Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tech <tech@rkn.ovh> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 46 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-09 19:50 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:20 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-10 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-10 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" cyaiplexys <cyaiplexys@sitesplace.net> - 2018-08-10 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-10 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-12 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 10:40 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 22:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-23 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2018-08-09 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-08-23 23:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 08:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 09:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-24 21:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-24 22:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 23:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 02:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 17:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 00:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-29 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 03:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 19:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-31 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-09-04 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 19:50 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-05 04:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-05 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:50 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-04 21:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-09-04 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 19:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 02:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-30 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-30 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-30 01:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 22:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-02 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-09-02 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-03 07:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-09-03 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 07:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-03 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-29 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 13:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 05:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-24 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-24 18:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 19:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-25 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-27 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-27 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-25 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-08-25 02:50 +0200
Re: mailing list is the future (corrected spelling mistakes) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-08-09 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2018-08-11 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-12 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-08-10 10:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-10 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-11 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-13 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-08-11 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-10-04 10:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-10-04 06:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:10 +0200
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
| From | Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtXoR-70h-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199729 |
On Monday, 3 Sep 2018 at 10:42, Dan Purgert wrote: [...] > That was my take on the matter as well - or at least it was a suggestion > that perhaps the debian lists "move away from these 'old' communication > channels". And it was reassuring to see that I am not alone in preferring nntp and other "archaic" (e.g. pop!) protocols. I hate web based discussion fora and tend to avoid them (or find myself finding reasons to not go look at them very often). -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50 & org 9.1.13 on Debian buster/sid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtY1z-7rM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199732 |
Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Monday, 3 Sep 2018 at 10:42, Dan Purgert wrote: > > [...] > >> That was my take on the matter as well - or at least it was a suggestion >> that perhaps the debian lists "move away from these 'old' communication >> channels". > > And it was reassuring to see that I am not alone in preferring nntp and > other "archaic" (e.g. pop!) protocols. I hate web based discussion fora > and tend to avoid them (or find myself finding reasons to not go look at > them very often). Quite - I'm happily using gmane's(?) mailing-list-to-nntp gateway for this; as I find it easier to keep track of things in slrn than I do in mutt (mostly due to forgetting to check all of them). -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtVdn-5NQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199701 |
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 09:06:07AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: >Some email clients have filtering. Get one. Many also permit the changing of the Subject: field when the topic has wandered away from the original value. It would be a great service to many of one's fellow mailing list participants if more people would take advantage of that. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws5JU-6L7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199547 |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2018 03:33:16 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > [...] But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has disabled > fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I still need > to log in daily [...] > > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you can. > Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other way around > by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. Sounds a bit odd, since fetchmail can (apparently) be configured to tell the other end to delete the mails it pulls. Alternately, do they provide pop3 access? -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws63f-6QY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199547 |
On Wednesday, 29 Aug 2018 at 05:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > So I'm an obnoxious old fart, show me an even better way, if you can. > Computers are supposed to do work FOR the user, not the other way around > by creating circuitous ways past the ticket taker. +1 from another old fart. I've recently gone back to using pop with my main mail server (office365) as the only way to remain in control of my email. Luckily they still allow this. For how long is anybody's guess. I use Emacs gnus giving me splitting, scoring, spam control, ... And I love nntp access to newsgroups and mailing lists. -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50 & org 9.1.13 on Debian buster/sid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wtaHv-3Q8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199547 |
On 2018-08-29 10:54, Gene Heskett wrote: <snipped> > Thats all about 10x easier than launching a ^@& browser, logging into > the mail server and reading the crap presented, in the order of > arrivasl > there. But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has disabled > fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I still need > to log in daily and delete the crap by hand to reduce my exposure to > whatever email harvesting bull crap they may do. Its not a perfect > solution, but it beats webmail like a white mouthed mule when the + key > is hit 500x a day. Oh, I thought it was just me has to do this, getting tedious. mick -- Key ID 4BFEBB31
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-01 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wteBs-66g-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199679 |
On Saturday 01 September 2018 05:46:57 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-08-29 10:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > <snipped> > > > Thats all about 10x easier than launching a ^@& browser, logging > > into the mail server and reading the crap presented, in the order of > > arrivasl > > there. But because 99% of my ISP's users use IMAP, my ISP has > > disabled fetchmails ability to delete a successfully pulled email, I > > still need to log in daily and delete the crap by hand to reduce my > > exposure to whatever email harvesting bull crap they may do. Its not > > a perfect solution, but it beats webmail like a white mouthed mule > > when the + key is hit 500x a day. > > Oh, I thought it was just me has to do this, getting tedious. > > mick My description is a bit more colorfull than "tedious" but it is what it is. Sigh... -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws6mB-6Xx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199542 |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:33:16AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" >folks don't "get": But what the luddites seem to miss is that the protocol is far less important than the content, and even if the luddites don't like the new stuff, most people do--and take the content with them. Increasingly, people who refuse to use anything new and shiny will be put out to pasture in an ever shrinking corner of the net. It reminds me of the passionate amiga or vax fans of a couple of decades ago--at some point it doesn't really matter who was right; the systems are dead and buried. That said, there's enough legacy stuff out there that most of the luddites can probably finish out their careers without ever learning anything new, if that's what they want.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws6FX-7iH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199559 |
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 06:57:01 Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:33:16AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > >And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" > >folks don't "get": > > But what the luddites seem to miss is that the protocol is far less > important than the content, and even if the luddites don't like the > new stuff, most people do--and take the content with them. > Increasingly, people who refuse to use anything new and shiny will be > put out to pasture in an ever shrinking corner of the net. It reminds > me of the passionate amiga or vax fans of a couple of decades ago--at > some point it doesn't really matter who was right; the systems are > dead and buried. That said, there's enough legacy stuff out there that > most of the luddites can probably finish out their careers without > ever learning anything new, if that's what they want. Point taken. But I won't last forever like Jimmy Carter, even had a wakeup call in the form of a pulmonary embolism that came very close to putting a ~30~ on the end of my story 3 years back. I don't recommend it as a way to die, it scary as hell not being able to take a breath. But I will eventually go away. I've had an interesting ride for nearly 84 years now. And a list of BTDT's that most wouldn't believe... -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws6Zk-7p0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199559 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:57:01AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:33:16AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > >And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" > >folks don't "get": > > But what the luddites seem to miss is that the protocol is far less > important than the content, and even if the luddites don't like the > new stuff, most people do--and take the content with them. [...] I'll carry the "luddite" as an honour badge, then. Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGheAACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaXPgCeJU+c+nF+OlIk0L7wRysGlss6 ShgAnAttn47A4PcUrdp/bdRPP00gujeK =4IdH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7iG-7vs-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199565 |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:39:12 +0200 <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:57:01AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:33:16AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > >And Gnus. That's exactly the point all those "yay, modern, shiny" > > >folks don't "get": > > > > But what the luddites seem to miss is that the protocol is far less > > important than the content, and even if the luddites don't like the > > new stuff, most people do--and take the content with them. > > [...] > > I'll carry the "luddite" as an honour badge, then. > Change, when it is obviously for the worse, and even just when it's not obviously for the better, should be resisted. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7iG-7vs-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199568 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Joe wrote: [...] > Change, when it is obviously for the worse, and even just when it's not > obviously for the better, should be resisted. Change should be *always* resisted. On principle! (Remember: I'm the luddite ;-P Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGiksACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaLCACdHf5LF5WslhgKbfxja2W96YwK QEgAnRLWjNKJdKof5Y6W9Hlo4Piz1Cnz =fhdu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7sm-7NM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199569 |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:58:03 +0200 <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Joe wrote: > > [...] > > > Change, when it is obviously for the worse, and even just when it's > > not obviously for the better, should be resisted. > > Change should be *always* resisted. On principle! > No, very occasionally, a proposed change is a clear improvement. Usually it's just about altering the distribution of income. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7LH-7TB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199570 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:58:03 +0200 > <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Joe wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Change, when it is obviously for the worse, and even just when it's > > > not obviously for the better, should be resisted. > > > > Change should be *always* resisted. On principle! > > > > No, very occasionally, a proposed change is a clear improvement. > Usually it's just about altering the distribution of income. Hey, this was tongue-in-cheek. I know life is change. You stop changing when you're dead (in a certain sense: in a more general sense, you don't, but what /is/ "you" when you're dead, anyway?) Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGkN8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYvlACZAc0An6TjLa3rSmt4bJaMawlK eSsAniEQZWe5uO2A1UnZC1leCys+NJIJ =miMP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7LI-7TB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199570 |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Joe wrote: >No, very occasionally, a proposed change is a clear improvement. >Usually it's just about altering the distribution of income. Rather, in my experience, resistance to change is usually about preserving the status quo and reinforcing the existing division of winners and losers. For example, in this thread, we see that mechanisms which make more information available to more people in a more easily accesible form must be worse because those people don't know what they're doing. Or something. I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean priesthood based on internet protocols from the 80s. (Regardless of how great those protocols are if you just understand them properly.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws7Vn-7WD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199572 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:27:41AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Joe wrote: > >No, very occasionally, a proposed change is a clear improvement. > >Usually it's just about altering the distribution of income. > > Rather, in my experience, resistance to change is usually about > preserving the status quo and reinforcing the existing division of > winners and losers. > > For example, in this thread, we see Whoever that "we" is. You, sure. Me, not. > that mechanisms which make more > information available to more people in a more easily accesible form > must be worse because those people don't know what they're doing. Or > something. I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion > people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean > priesthood based on internet protocols from the 80s. (Regardless of > how great those protocols are if you just understand them properly.) That's your world view, and you are entitled to it. It's not mine, and there are others disagreeing here. Let's agree to differ. Content has been exchanged, I think we've had the chance to understand each other's point, we've even exchanged mild insults "shiny folks" vs "luddites" -- let's leave it at this. Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluGkl8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbwpwCdH9HgI6RF1LXCfKhXousSQyMI 2jcAnieOIE5QyvNA/ZkQtlCwGa66zEYu =3HgY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws853-7ZT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199572 |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:27:41 -0400 Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Joe wrote: > >No, very occasionally, a proposed change is a clear improvement. > >Usually it's just about altering the distribution of income. > > Rather, in my experience, resistance to change is usually about > preserving the status quo and reinforcing the existing division of > winners and losers. > > For example, in this thread, we see that mechanisms which make more > information available to more people in a more easily accesible form > must be worse because those people don't know what they're doing. Or > something. I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion > people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean > priesthood based on internet protocols from the 80s. (Regardless of > how great those protocols are if you just understand them properly.) > I was around when Microsoft abandoned Usenet for shiny new web forums. I used to post on the Small Business Server newsgroup. I'd look in two or three times a day, usually add one or two posts. After the change, I couldn't just type a line or two, I had to login. The next time I looked in, I had to login again because it had timed out. After I while, I only bothered to login if I had two or three posts to make, it wasn't worth the effort otherwise. After a couple of months, I stopped going there at all, and several other frequent posters had already dropped out. I don't know how to convey this, but the whole thing had a very different feel. Before, I'd been among friends, afterwards, I was very conscious of the interface and the moderators, of Microsoft looking over my shoulder... there were no winners or losers on Usenet, we all helped each other. Afterwards, not so much. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws854-7ZT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199572 |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:35:21 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > Michael Stone wrote: > > [...] I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion > > people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean > > priesthood based on internet protocols from the 80s. > > So, we need to replace HTTP then? Got it. :) > > No. We start with CSS... -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws8HL-8rG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199580 |
Joe wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:35:21 -0000 (UTC) > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > >> Michael Stone wrote: >> > [...] I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion >> > people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean >> > priesthood based on internet protocols from the 80s. >> >> So, we need to replace HTTP then? Got it. :) >> >> > > No. We start with CSS... Don't think that "Cascading Style Sheets" count as a protocol ... nor were they a thing in the 80s. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ws854-7ZT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #199572 |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:35:21PM -0000, Dan Purgert wrote: >Michael Stone wrote: >> [...] I personally tend to think that bringing the next billion >> people online is more important than maintaining a Manichaean priesthood >> based on internet protocols from the 80s. > >So, we need to replace HTTP then? Got it. :) You might not have noticed, but HTTP is evolving...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web