Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tech <tech@rkn.ovh> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 232 — 46 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-09 19:50 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" tech <tech@rkn.ovh> - 2018-08-09 20:20 +0200
RE: mailing list vs "the futur" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-10 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-10 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-10 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" cyaiplexys <cyaiplexys@sitesplace.net> - 2018-08-10 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-10 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-12 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 10:40 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 22:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-23 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2018-08-09 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-10 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-08-23 23:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 08:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Piotr Martyniuk <zaxonxp45@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 09:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-24 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-24 21:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-24 22:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 23:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 02:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-25 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-27 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 15:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 17:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 00:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-29 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 03:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 19:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 19:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-31 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-09-04 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-04 18:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 19:50 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 03:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-05 04:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-05 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 20:30 +0200
[Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-04 20:50 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [Off-topic] Was: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-04 21:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-04 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-04 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-09-04 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 19:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-29 02:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 09:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-30 12:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-30 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-29 17:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-30 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-30 01:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 22:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-01 23:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-09-02 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 15:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-09-02 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 16:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-09-02 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-02 17:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-09-02 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2018-09-03 07:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-09-03 08:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 07:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-09-03 15:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-03 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-09-03 13:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-29 12:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-09-01 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 13:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-29 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 13:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-29 14:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-29 14:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 14:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-28 09:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 13:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 15:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 22:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 18:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-28 01:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-28 05:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 12:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-24 18:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-24 18:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 19:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 20:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-08-24 20:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-25 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2018-08-27 10:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 13:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-27 14:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-25 10:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-08-25 02:50 +0200
Re: mailing list is the future (corrected spelling mistakes) Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2018-08-09 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-08-09 22:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> - 2018-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> - 2018-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2018-08-11 11:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2018-08-12 20:10 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-13 12:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-08-10 10:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-08-10 12:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-10 12:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2018-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-11 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-13 15:30 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2018-08-13 16:20 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> - 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-08-11 00:50 +0200
Re: mailing list vs "the futur" dekkzz78@gmail.com - 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200
Page 12 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12]
| From | Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlaY2-6q6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198510 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:39:36PM +0000, tech wrote: >[0;30m[0;37m [0;36mThe way most people keep up to date on network news is through subscription to a number of mail reflectors (also known as >[0;36m[0;37m [0;36mmail exploders). Mail reflectors are special electronic mailboxes which, when they receive a message, resend it to a list of >[0;36m[0;37m [0;36mother mailboxes. This in effect creates a discussion group on a particular topic. >[0;36m[0;37m [0;36m- E. Krol; The Hitchhikers Guide to the Internet; RFC 1118; Sept. 1989. >[0;36m >[0;36m[0;37m Seem's the first "bitnic listserv" is dated from 1984 ! More than 34 years ago ! >[0;37m >[0;37m Just as a reminder, we are now in 2018 ... something called the XXI century ... with 4G, optical FTTH connection, >[0;37m smartphones ... >[0;37m >[0;37m Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? OK. Done. There's a forum at http://forums.debian.net. As Maui said: "You're welcome." -- For more information, please reread.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlcn8-778-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198510 |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:39:36PM +0000, tech wrote: >Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something >more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? Assuming you are talking about systems for discussion, rather than filing bugs: Debian has <http://forums.debian.net/> and has had for a long time, but it gets relatively little use. Personally I'd love to see the list archive software get an overhaul, and mailman3's "HyperKitty" archiver looks very promising to me, but I'm not sure whether it has delivered on the promise, which was to offer a very forum-like interface to mailing lists, permitting people to reply via web, or click "+1" buttons (thus freeing the mail interface of lots of "+1" mails, a blight that debian-user fortunately doesn't suffer) -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wliLT-2tA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198543 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:59 AM Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:39:36PM +0000, tech wrote: > >Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something > >more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? > > Assuming you are talking about systems for discussion, rather than > filing bugs: Debian has <http://forums.debian.net/> and has had for a > long time, but it gets relatively little use. > > Personally I'd love to see the list archive software get an overhaul, > and mailman3's "HyperKitty" archiver looks very promising to me, but I'm > not sure whether it has delivered on the promise, which was to offer a > very forum-like interface to mailing lists, permitting people to reply > via web, or click "+1" buttons (thus freeing the mail interface of lots > of "+1" mails, a blight that debian-user fortunately doesn't suffer) > > > I've set up mailman3 servers and messed with the code quite a bit. It's a huge step up from mailman v2, and not just cause the web interface is a whole lot slicker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wld9v-7BJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198510 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:39:36PM +0000, tech wrote: > The way most people keep up to date on network news is through > subscription to a number of mail reflectors [...] To add to other people's responses here (with which I do agree), perhaps you should consider using a more modern mail user agent: guessing by your headers (the User-Agent header is missing, so I can only guess), you are using a Microsoft user agent, perhaps Outlook. Microsoft actually never "got" email right, and these days downright hates it, because it is decentralized and can't be controlled as centralized platforms can be[1]. So your experience will always be second-rate with such a user agent. [1] I know what I'm talking about: I've watched the slow and painful process of replacing mail with something more "modern" (O365) in a big corp, and the underhanded tactics of badmouthing and marginalizing fueled by a Microsoft-supported "team". cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlttbDMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kY7hwCeOlyZrrnQDmZtBaQw/p/cyDbl S38An2EMvtBIGgenuXyiQ3wg1uh9V4vI =yYn9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-11 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlBbQ-4Z1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198547 |
On Friday, 10 Aug 2018 at 12:42, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > [1] I know what I'm talking about: I've watched the slow and painful > process of replacing mail with something more "modern" (O365) in > a big corp, and the underhanded tactics of badmouthing and > marginalizing fueled by a Microsoft-supported "team". +1. I've been forced to use O365 at work. Luckily, there's still pop access to this so I can manage my email with the tools I want (which, in my case, is gnus in Emacs giving me splitting, adaptive scoring, expiry, ...; YMMV). -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50 & org 9.1.13 on Debian 9.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-11 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlC7T-5xb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198617 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Friday, 10 Aug 2018 at 12:42, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [1] I know what I'm talking about: I've watched the slow and painful > > process of replacing mail with something more "modern" (O365) in > > a big corp, and the underhanded tactics of badmouthing and > > marginalizing fueled by a Microsoft-supported "team". > > +1. > > I've been forced to use O365 at work. Luckily, there's still pop access > to this so I can manage my email with the tools I want (which, in my > case, is gnus in Emacs giving me splitting, adaptive scoring, > expiry, ...; YMMV). In my case they even had imap running (guess they didn't know [2]...) Cheers [2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this "plausible deniability", I guess. - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAltu4/gACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaB2ACfV3DdaKlCAyevZaOBA7Dy9cny DBMAni8bBidpQp+41ThJvAxFKwYrorvy =FKes -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-13 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wml4Z-6IJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198621 |
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > [2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call > tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be > distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over > between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this > "plausible deniability", I guess. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-13 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wmly2-6Sn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198703 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:24:44AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call > > tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be > > distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over > > between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this > > "plausible deniability", I guess. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law > > "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is > utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone > won't mistake for the genuine article." :-) I think it's impossible to parody a Creationist. Full stop. And I feel one shouldn't do it... Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAltxjU4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZHcQCeMLGdGo4ugWgmD1mGslHsk6w7 JCMAn2g40Z2va4to9k6vtP3iaD8qEDDc =AbQV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-13 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wmlRn-7ec-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198707 |
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:53:18PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:24:44AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > [2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call > > > tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be > > > distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over > > > between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this > > > "plausible deniability", I guess. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law > > > > "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is > > utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone > > won't mistake for the genuine article." > > :-) > > I think it's impossible to parody a Creationist. Full stop. And I > feel one shouldn't do it... If it is in fact impossible, and that 'so attempting' simply appears as being a Creationist, therefore there would be no parody (at least, none observed, only, at most, felt by the creator of said parody) in any attempt to so parody, and so perhaps your feeling is suggesting you ought in fact demonstrate the wisdom of "attempting" to so parody? Don't get me wrong, you may prefer to fail in your own duty to your conscience pursuant to your Creator by failing to "attempt to" parody being a Creationist - IDK, it's frankly a matter for you? Now, we can debate whether your duty is one owed -only- to your conscience, or in fact to your Creator, or p'raps most likely to both, and if the latter, that you might be seriously deficient in said duty in your failure to "attempt" to parody said Creator, but notwithstanding, also that doing so could conceivably encroach on the grounds of cultural creativity intended to be protected (and safe spaces so created) by the creators of the Debian Code of Conduct, but it is likely that this would give rise within you to a conflict of duties - to your Creator, vis a vis, to the Debian CoC creators. Certainly I do not envy your dilemma here... may you have wisdom in the exercise of your authority and power in regards to your "attempts" to parody one or another Creator or creators respectively.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-11 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlnBU-5hf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198510 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 09/08/2018 18:39, tech wrote: > Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something > more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? No. Mail lists works as well now as they did then. Mail lists are efficient, to the point, simple to use. Don't try to fix what isn't broken. -- Mark Rousell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-11 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlooh-5Lk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198599 |
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 22:35:19 +0100 Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> wrote: > On 09/08/2018 18:39, tech wrote: > > Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something > > more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? > > No. Mail lists works as well now as they did then. > > Mail lists are efficient, to the point, simple to use. > > Don't try to fix what isn't broken. > > try to fix? try to ruin IMHO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dekkzz78@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-11 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wlxUB-2VR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198510 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 08/09, tech wrote: >The way most people keep up to date on network news is through subscription to a number of mail reflectors (also known as mail exploders). Mail reflectors are special electronic mailboxes which, when they receive a message, resend it to a list of other mailboxes. This in effect creates a discussion group on a particular topic. >- E. Krol; The Hitchhikers Guide to the Internet; RFC 1118; Sept. 1989. > > >Seem's the first "bitnic listserv" is dated from 1984 ! More than 34 years ago ! >Just as a reminder, we are now in 2018 ... something called the XXI century ... with 4G, optical FTTH connection, smartphones ... Don't assume there are areas which don't have all the high tech your quoting, great swathes of the US still have only access to copper wire at circa 2000 speeds. >Should'nt be time to move away from an old mail-listing to something more modern like a bugzilla or else ??? -- regards..... Dekks Herton Thinkpad T61 2.0Ghz 2GB WSXGA+ Jabber IM: dekkzz78@jabber.hot-chilli.net
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web