Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198288 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-05 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-08-06 14:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 13 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
(solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 13:10 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 13:40 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-08-05 13:50 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 14:00 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-08-05 14:10 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 14:30 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-08-05 15:00 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) T BkRl <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:20 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-08-05 15:20 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-08-05 15:30 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 17:50 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) T BkRl <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:30 +0200
Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-06 14:20 +0200
| From | Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) |
| Message-ID | <wjp57-5jk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
apt-get remove libfuse2
after running command above, i can install jmtpfs
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 6:34:56 PM GMT+8, Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> wrote:
Cool, so you have libfuse but not fuse it seems. Let's try this:
apt-get install fuseapt-get install jmtpfs
if jmtpfs install still fails
i would try apt-get install -f
apt-get cleanapt-get updateapt-get upgrade
then try apt-get install jmtpfs again
if it still does not workyou might need to usedpkg --configure -a
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote:
ii libfuse2:i386 2.9.7-1+deb9u1 i386 Filesystem in Userspace (library)
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 6:13:17 PM GMT+8, Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> wrote:
Long,Please send the output of
dpkg -l | grep fuse
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:08 AM Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote:
last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't install mplayer
this time mplayer can be installed, but jmtpfs can't, below is error msg:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
jmtpfs : Depends: fuse but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjpy9-5tc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198288 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Awesome! happy to help. On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 7:03 AM Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote: > apt-get remove libfuse2 > > after running command above, i can install jmtpfs > > On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 6:34:56 PM GMT+8, Shea Alterio < > krusete@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cool, so you have libfuse but not fuse it seems. Let's try this: > > apt-get install fuse > apt-get install jmtpfs > > if jmtpfs install still fails > > i would try > apt-get install -f > apt-get clean > apt-get update > apt-get upgrade > > then try apt-get install jmtpfs again > > if it still does not work > you might need to use > dpkg --configure -a > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote: > > ii libfuse2:i386 2.9.7-1+deb9u1 > i386 Filesystem in Userspace (library) > > > > On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 6:13:17 PM GMT+8, Shea Alterio < > krusete@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Long, > Please send the output of > > *dpkg -l | grep fuse* > > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:08 AM Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote: > > last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't > install mplayer > > this time mplayer can be installed, but jmtpfs can't, below is error msg: > > > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > jmtpfs : Depends: fuse but it is not going to be installed > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjpHP-5wM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198288 |
Le 05/08/2018 à 12:58, Long Wind a écrit : > apt-get remove libfuse2 > > after running command above, i can install jmtpfs Weird. fuse depends on the same version of libfuse2, so if removing libfuse2 allowed to install fuse, it means that the version of fuse that you just installed does not match the version of libfuse2 that you removed. But it was the latest stable released version, so the version you have now installed may not be the latest stable version. What is the output of apt-cache policy fuse libfuse2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjpRv-5Am-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198291 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
fuse:
Installed: 2.9.7-1
Candidate: 2.9.7-1
Version table:
*** 2.9.7-1 500
500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libfuse2:
Installed: 2.9.7-1
Candidate: 2.9.7-1
Version table:
*** 2.9.7-1 500
500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 7:44:31 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote:
Le 05/08/2018 à 12:58, Long Wind a écrit :
> apt-get remove libfuse2
>
> after running command above, i can install jmtpfs
Weird. fuse depends on the same version of libfuse2, so if removing
libfuse2 allowed to install fuse, it means that the version of fuse that
you just installed does not match the version of libfuse2 that you
removed. But it was the latest stable released version, so the version
you have now installed may not be the latest stable version.
What is the output of
apt-cache policy fuse libfuse2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjq1c-5SX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198292 |
Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read and reply. Le 05/08/2018 à 13:52, Long Wind a écrit : > fuse: > Installed: 2.9.7-1 > Candidate: 2.9.7-1 > Version table: > *** 2.9.7-1 500 > 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > libfuse2: > Installed: 2.9.7-1 > Candidate: 2.9.7-1 > Version table: > *** 2.9.7-1 500 > 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status As expected, you actually downgraded fuse to the version affected by the vulnerability exposed in DSA-4257-1. The reason is probably that there is no more security mirror declared in your sources.list. Otherwise apt-cache would show the versions available on this mirror. So you do not get security updates any more. > On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 7:44:31 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote: > > Le 05/08/2018 à 12:58, Long Wind a écrit : >> apt-get remove libfuse2 >> >> after running command above, i can install jmtpfs > > Weird. fuse depends on the same version of libfuse2, so if removing > libfuse2 allowed to install fuse, it means that the version of fuse that > you just installed does not match the version of libfuse2 that you > removed. But it was the latest stable released version, so the version > you have now installed may not be the latest stable version. > > What is the output of > > apt-cache policy fuse libfuse2 > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjqkx-5ZH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198295 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Sorry, it seems that default behavior of yahoo mail is top post
yes, i've comment out all sources in sources.list except
http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch main
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 8:05:45 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote:
Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read and reply.
Le 05/08/2018 à 13:52, Long Wind a écrit :
> fuse:
> Installed: 2.9.7-1
> Candidate: 2.9.7-1
> Version table:
> *** 2.9.7-1 500
> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> libfuse2:
> Installed: 2.9.7-1
> Candidate: 2.9.7-1
> Version table:
> *** 2.9.7-1 500
> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
As expected, you actually downgraded fuse to the version affected by the
vulnerability exposed in DSA-4257-1.
The reason is probably that there is no more security mirror declared in
your sources.list. Otherwise apt-cache would show the versions available
on this mirror. So you do not get security updates any more.
> On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 7:44:31 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote:
>
> Le 0
5/08/2018 à 12:58, Long Wind a écrit :>> apt-get remove libfuse2
>>
>> after running command above, i can install jmtpfs
>
> Weird. fuse depends on the same version of libfuse2, so if removing
> libfuse2 allowed to install fuse, it means that the version of fuse that
> you just installed does not match the version of libfuse2 that you
> removed. But it was the latest stable released version, so the version
> you have now installed may not be the latest stable version.
>
> What is the output of
>
> apt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjqNz-69J-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198296 |
Le 05/08/2018 à 14:24, Long Wind a écrit : > Sorry, it seems that default behavior of yahoo mail is top post Can't you move the cursor below the quoted text ? > yes, i've comment out all sources in sources.list except > http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch main Why ? You don't get security updates any more, and since you already got some security updates, you may face the dependency problem again until all installed security updates eventually get included in the main archive (at the next point release). > On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 8:05:45 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote: > > Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read and reply. > > Le 05/08/2018 à 13:52, Long Wind a écrit : >> fuse: >> Installed: 2.9.7-1 >> Candidate: 2.9.7-1 >> Version table: >> *** 2.9.7-1 500 >> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status >> libfuse2: >> Installed: 2.9.7-1 >> Candidate: 2.9.7-1 >> Version table: >> *** 2.9.7-1 500 >> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > As expected, you actually downgraded fuse to the version affected by the > vulnerability exposed in DSA-4257-1. > The reason is probably that there is no more security mirror declared in > your sources.list. Otherwise apt-cache would show the versions available > on this mirror. So you do not get security updates any more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | T BkRl <krusete@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjr6V-6vE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198298 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Long, it’s much safer to generate a new sources.list without security, please give it a try. I recommend leaving Fast Server Select on. https://debgen.simplylinux.ch Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail. I’m on my iPhone using MS Outlook and it doesn’t let you choose where to put the cursor relative to the reply text. ________________________________ From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 8:50 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Le 05/08/2018 à 14:24, Long Wind a écrit : > Sorry, it seems that default behavior of yahoo mail is top post Can't you move the cursor below the quoted text ? > yes, i've comment out all sources in sources.list except > http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch main Why ? You don't get security updates any more, and since you already got some security updates, you may face the dependency problem again until all installed security updates eventually get included in the main archive (at the next point release). > On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 8:05:45 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote: > > Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read and reply. > > Le 05/08/2018 à 13:52, Long Wind a écrit : >> fuse: >> Installed: 2.9.7-1 >> Candidate: 2.9.7-1 >> Version table: >> *** 2.9.7-1 500 >> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status >> libfuse2: >> Installed: 2.9.7-1 >> Candidate: 2.9.7-1 >> Version table: >> *** 2.9.7-1 500 >> 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > As expected, you actually downgraded fuse to the version affected by the > vulnerability exposed in DSA-4257-1. > The reason is probably that there is no more security mirror declared in > your sources.list. Otherwise apt-cache would show the versions available > on this mirror. So you do not get security updates any more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjr6W-6vE-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198298 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Long, it’s much safer to generate a new sources.list without security "Safer without security". Please refrain from spreading misinformation. > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail The *default* is just that: whatever happens if you do not do anything. It is where the cursor is positioned at beginning, but you can move the cursor. It is what is initially hidden, but you can reveal it. If you have any respect for the persons on this list, you will make the tiny little effort necessary to make your mails readable. And if you do not have respect for the persons on this list, then you do not deserve respect in return. Regards, -- Nicolas George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjrgC-6z7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198300 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Sorry Nicolas Saying sorry when you do it again is a lie. Good bye, this is the last you will hear of me. -- Nicolas George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjts6-7Po-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198301 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 09:28 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote: > T BkRl (2018-08-05): > > Sorry Nicolas > > Saying sorry when you do it again is a lie. > > Good bye, this is the last you will hear of me. > > -- > Nicolas George > Someone needs a hug . . . < *virtual hug given* > : )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | T BkRl <krusete@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjrgC-6z7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198300 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Sorry Nicolas, I didn’t realize the location of my posting was such a grave offense. I formally apologize for sending my advice to Long on top. ________________________________ From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 9:16 AM To: T BkRl Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Long, it’s much safer to generate a new sources.list without security "Safer without security". Please refrain from spreading misinformation. > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail The *default* is just that: whatever happens if you do not do anything. It is where the cursor is positioned at beginning, but you can move the cursor. It is what is initially hidden, but you can reveal it. If you have any respect for the persons on this list, you will make the tiny little effort necessary to make your mails readable. And if you do not have respect for the persons on this list, then you do not deserve respect in return. Regards, -- Nicolas George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-06 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wjMEp-38q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #198298 |
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:10:31PM +0000, T BkRl wrote: > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail. I’m on my iPhone using MS Outlook and it doesn’t let you choose where to put the cursor relative to the reply text. Then stop using that.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web