Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #202483 > unrolled thread
| Started by | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 18:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-11-17 17:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 17 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-15 18:30 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 21:10 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-15 21:40 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 22:00 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-16 14:00 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-16 14:30 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-11-16 14:50 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-16 15:40 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-11-16 16:40 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 21:10 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-17 08:00 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-11-17 16:20 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-11-17 16:30 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> - 2018-11-17 19:20 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-17 21:10 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-11-17 22:40 +0100
Re: New SSD on a MacBook Pro solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2018-11-17 17:50 +0100
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-15 18:30 +0100 |
| Subject | New SSD on a MacBook Pro |
| Message-ID | <wUtCN-6ov-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, I've got a compatibility question regarding SSDs. I run debian 9.6 on a MacBookPro12,1 (Early 2015, 13"). I'm thinking of upgrading the stock 128 GB SSD [1]. Specifically, I'm considering the Trascend JetDrive 850 [2]. The original SSD uses a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface and the AHCI protocol. Although MacBookPro12,1 cannot take advantage of PCIe 3.0 (I gather it only supports PCIe 2.0), it supports the NVMe specification, hence it'd be possible to upgrade to an NVMe SSD [3]. JetDrive 850 uses a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface with NVMe. What do you think in terms of compatibility with debian? What worries me is that JetDrive 850 requires macOS version 10.13 or later, and I wonder whether debian supports it. Is this only a matter of NVMe (macOS supports NVMe starting from version 10.13; linux since kernel version 3.3), or is there something else to consider? Thanks in advance! [1] I'm running short of space, since I've got a Windows 10 instance in KVM that's hungry of storage space. Almost all of the 32 GB that I've allocated are used by just the system and its updates! [2] https://www.transcend-info.com/Products/No-956 [3] https://beetstech.com/blog/apple-proprietary-ssd-ultimate-guide-to-specs-and-upgrades#hdr-21
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-15 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUw7D-851-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202483 |
solitone wrote: > What do you think in terms of compatibility with debian? What worries me > is that JetDrive 850 requires macOS version 10.13 or later, and I wonder > whether debian supports it. Is this only a matter of NVMe (macOS > supports NVMe starting from version 10.13; linux since kernel version > 3.3), or is there something else to consider? I don't think so, I also do not think you have to stick to this specific drive (JetDrive 850) - perhaps macOS certified, but from linux perspective it would make no difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-15 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUwAF-8fk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202506 |
On 15/11/2018 21:01, deloptes wrote: > I also do not think you have to stick to this specific > drive (JetDrive 850) - perhaps macOS certified, but from linux perspective > it would make no difference. The thing is the form factor, which unfortunately is proprietary [1]. The connector resembles the standard M.2, but in fact is different. Another options would be OWC Aura Pro X [2], but many people report overheating issues with that drive. [1] https://beetstech.com/blog/apple-proprietary-ssd-ultimate-guide-to-specs-and-upgrades#hdr-6 [2] https://www.owcdigital.com/products/aura-pro-x
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-15 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUwU1-8mH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202510 |
solitone wrote: > The thing is the form factor, which unfortunately is proprietary [1]. > The connector resembles the standard M.2, but in fact is different. OK this is a valid argument. Check first if someone has used it on your type of hardware and what is the feedback - I assume you are not the first. NVMe is working fine - debian provide the kernel which provides the support and I have seen M.2 working just fine - don't know what is in the background, but linux was on top.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wULT3-14A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202513 |
On 15/11/2018 21:48, deloptes wrote: > Check first if someone has used it on your type > of hardware and what is the feedback - I assume you are not the first. NVMe > is working fine - debian provide the kernel which provides the support and > I have seen M.2 working just fine Late 2016 - Mid 2017 MacBookPros (MBPs) with Generation 5 SSDs (PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe) do work with linux kernel >= 4.11 [1]. MacBookPro13,3 (it uses a Samsung NVMe controller) also works with kernel < 4.11. In contrast, MacBookPro13,1, MacBookPro13,2, MacBookPro14,1, and MacBookPro14,2 (they have an Apple NVMe controller) need a kernel patch with kernel < 4.11 [1]. I would think that kernel >= 4.11 supports Trascend JetDrive 850, but since different controllers have a different level of support I can't say it for sure. For the time being I have found no reports on this SSD with linux. [1] https://gist.github.com/roadrunner2/1289542a748d9a104e7baec6a92f9cd7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUMm5-1ul-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202513 |
Another issue I have is--how to migrate my debian system from the old original SSD to the new larger SSD? As for macOS [1], it should be easy. There is a macOS application called Time Machine that allows to backup macOS from the old SSD and to restore it to the new SSD. This would work with a single boot system with macOS, but I have no idea what will happen to Grub [2] in this process. However my main concern is with the linux partition. How can I migrate it? If I simply clone the linux partition from the old drive to the new drive, I fear something would go wrong, as the new drive is different and would require different drivers, missing in the original linux system. What would be the best strategy? [1] I have a dual boot system, and I have kept macOS mainly to keep the possibility of firmware upgrades. [2] Grub allows to boot debian. If I do nothing, Grub starts and boots debian. If I press the "alt" key during startup, the Apple's original EFI boot loader starts and boots macOS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUMFr-1Bp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202530 |
> However my main concern is with the linux partition. How can I migrate it?
> If I simply clone the linux partition from the old drive to the new drive,
> I fear something would go wrong, as the new drive is different and would
> require different drivers, missing in the original linux system.
I would expect the clone to work just fine. I'd expect your initrd
contains drivers for both SATA and NVMe anyway.
But it's easy to check:
zcat /boot/initrd.img-<VERSION> | cpio -vt | grep nvm
will show you the relevant files in the your initrd.
You should have about 10 of them inside ../kernel/drivers/nvme/ if your
initrd is ready to boot from an NVMe drive.
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUNrQ-280-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202531 |
On 16/11/2018 14:46, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I would expect the clone to work just fine. I'd expect your initrd > contains drivers for both SATA and NVMe anyway. > > But it's easy to check: > > zcat /boot/initrd.img-<VERSION> | cpio -vt | grep nvm > > will show you the relevant files in the your initrd. > You should have about 10 of them inside ../kernel/drivers/nvme/ if your > initrd is ready to boot from an NVMe drive. I've got 8 of them: $ lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 | grep nvme lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/target lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet-fc.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet-rdma.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host/nvme-fc.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host/nvme-rdma.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host/nvme-core.ko lib/modules/4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64/kernel/drivers/nvme/host/nvme-fabrics.ko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUOnU-2Kt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202532 |
> I've got 8 of them:
So you should be all set.
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wUSBd-5vZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202533 |
Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I've got 8 of them: > > So you should be all set. It is worth trying, though Appli plays always dirty, but chances are good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 08:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wV2Ke-3kM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202531 |
On 16/11/2018 14:46, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I would expect the clone to work just fine. I'd expect your initrd > contains drivers for both SATA and NVMe anyway. OK. Now that I know that initrd does contain NVMe drivers, I would ask whether my strategy for cloning is sensible. Firstly, here's my original partition table: =================================== $ sudo parted -l Model: ATA APPLE SSD SM0128 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 121GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 20.5kB 210MB 210MB fat32 EFI System Partition boot, esp 2 210MB 22.6GB 22.4GB hfs+ 3 22.6GB 23.2GB 650MB hfs+ 4 23.2GB 31.2GB 8000MB linux-swap(v1) swap 5 31.4GB 121GB 89.8GB ext4 linux =================================== Partition 3 is macOS, partition 5 is linux. I don't know why partition 2 is there, macOS's Disk Utility created it when I originally partitioned the disk to make room for linux. Partition 1 is the EFI partition, which is mounted on /boot/efi: =================================== $ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on udev 4021656 0 4021656 0% /dev tmpfs 807236 1352 805884 1% /run /dev/sda5 85825416 68182636 13240004 84% / tmpfs 4036168 4892 4031276 1% /dev/shm tmpfs 5120 4 5116 1% /run/lock tmpfs 4036168 0 4036168 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/sda1 201633 23678 177955 12% /boot/efi tmpfs 807232 0 807232 0% /run/user/113 tmpfs 807232 16 807216 1% /run/user/1000 =================================== The debian installer put the Grub2 loader in this partition: =================================== $ sudo ls /boot/efi/EFI/debian grubx64.efi $ sudo efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: 0000 Timeout: 5 seconds BootOrder: 0000,0080 Boot0000* debian HD(1,GPT,d43355a1-7dc2-4a96-ba68-4400a5db3981,0x28,0x64000)/File(\EFI\debian\grubx64.efi) Boot0080* PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x5)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,911f18b9-6252-4cb8-8ad3-81c9ca73ded5,0x2a0f760,0x135f20)/File(\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi) Boot0081* Mac OS X PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x5)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,911f18b9-6252-4cb8-8ad3-81c9ca73ded5,0x2a0f760,0x135f20) BootFFFF* PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x5)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,911f18b9-6252-4cb8-8ad3-81c9ca73ded5,0x2a0f760,0x135f20)/File(\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi) =================================== Now, here is what I would perform: (1) Use macOS Time Machine to backup macOS on an external hard drive. (2) dd the linux partition into an image file: $ sudo dd bs=4M if=/dev/sda5 of=<ext_media>/debian_part.img (3) Install new drive. (4) Use macOS Recovery to restore macOS from the Time Machine backup. (5) I believe that point (4) will also restore the EFI partition, but will debian/grubx64.efi be preserved as well? Need to gather some info and check. Anyhow, I should have ended up with just two partitions: the EFI partition and the macOS partition. (6) Use macOS Disk Utility to partition the new disk. (7) How to restore the backed up debian partition? Do I need to reinstall a basic debian system from scratch and then run something like: sudo dd bs=4M if=<ext_media>/debian_part.img of=/dev/sdaN (where N is the new partition number)? Or is there some tool that can ease the recovery process? Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVay6-eD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202553 |
> 4 23.2GB 31.2GB 8000MB linux-swap(v1) swap
> 5 31.4GB 121GB 89.8GB ext4 linux
Didn't use LVM? Too bad: that means there's a risk your new dirve and
partitions will get new identifiers so your fstab may need to be adjusted.
> Now, here is what I would perform:
>
> (1) Use macOS Time Machine to backup macOS on an external hard drive.
> (2) dd the linux partition into an image file:
> $ sudo dd bs=4M if=/dev/sda5 of=<ext_media>/debian_part.img
> (3) Install new drive.
> (4) Use macOS Recovery to restore macOS from the Time Machine backup.
> (5) I believe that point (4) will also restore the EFI partition, but will
> debian/grubx64.efi be preserved as well? Need to gather some info and
> check. Anyhow, I should have ended up with just two partitions: the EFI
> partition and the macOS partition.
macOS doesn't touch EFI, AFAIK, so don't expect the Time Machine to
touch it either.
This sounds rather complicated.
Here's what I'd do:
1- take out the old SSD and put it into an external reader that you can
connect via USB
2- put the new SSD in
3- connect the old SSD via USB and boot to its macOS this way (if you
can boot into Debian this way, even better).
4- create the same partitions on the new drive as you had on the old drive.
5- Use `dd` to copy the content of each partition from the old drive to
the new drive.
6- reboot without the old drive. You should be done.
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVaHL-i7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202568 |
Stefan Monnier wrote: > 1- take out the old SSD and put it into an external reader that you can > connect via USB I think that's going to be difficult-to-expensive: it's not a SATA SSD, it connects through NVMe PCIe. There are external boxes that can support PCIe via Thunderbolt, but the cheap ones are around $200. -dsr-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVdmh-20Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202569 |
>> 1- take out the old SSD and put it into an external reader that you can
>> connect via USB
> I think that's going to be difficult-to-expensive: it's not a
> SATA SSD, it connects through NVMe PCIe.
Really? I thought his old drive was SATA (hence his worries that his
new drive would need new drivers).
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVf4J-38F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202571 |
On 17/11/2018 16:50, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Really? I thought his old drive was SATA (hence his worries that his > new drive would need new drivers). No, the old original drive is PCIe 3.0 x4 AHCI. The new one is PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVgtQ-3T7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202572 |
>> Really? I thought his old drive was SATA (hence his worries that his
>> new drive would need new drivers).
> No, the old original drive is PCIe 3.0 x4 AHCI. The new one is PCIe 3.0
> x4 NVMe.
If we can't get the two drives connected to the same system at the same
time, I guess I'd use a third (USB-connected) drive as intermediary
(and do twice the steps I outlined).
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wVbXc-10p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #202568 |
On 17 Nov 2018, at 16:06, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > Didn't use LVM? Too bad: that means there's a risk your new dirve and > partitions will get new identifiers so your fstab may need to be adjusted. Ehm.. no.. I didn’t! > macOS doesn't touch EFI, AFAIK, so don't expect the Time Machine to > touch it either. I also believe Time Machine won’t backup the EFI partition. Therefore macOS Recovery should recreate a default EFI partition when recovering from the Time Machine backup. A default EFI partition that would only contain Apple’s data, and not the Grub2 loader I have at the moment in the current drive. Regarding you suggestion and the external reader, I need to check if I can find something cheap.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web