Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #193149 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-02-27 11:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-02-27 15:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
fvwm -- undeserved BAD PRESS Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-02-27 11:00 +0100
Re: fvwm -- undeserved BAD PRESS John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-02-27 15:10 +0100
Re: fvwm -- undeserved BAD PRESS David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-02-27 15:20 +0100
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-02-27 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | fvwm -- undeserved BAD PRESS |
| Message-ID | <vnKdc-3eI-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I have days (errrr actually hours) of experience with fvwm.
Experts (<chuckle>) are telling me that significant mods to config files
*MANDATORY*. bull!!!!!!!!!!
Can tweaking config file(s) be profitable? -- Sure!
Are they necessary? -- *NO WAY*!!!!!
The more I ask for meek user info (and receive *GEEK*speak), the more
impressed I am with just how useful it can be *WITHOUT* any tweaks.
I'll admit to two mods:
1. disposed of atrocious wallpaper.
2. coerced visible font size suitable for tri-focal wearing
SeniorCitizen.
I'll continue to ask for "end user" oriented documentation.
I'll continue to drool over Geek Tweaks I get.
I'll continue to be impressed with what can be accomplished with fvsm --
"out of the box".
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-02-27 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vnO77-615-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #193149 |
Richard Owlett writes: > I have days (errrr actually hours) of experience with fvwm. > Experts (<chuckle>) are telling me that significant mods to config files > *MANDATORY*. bull!!!!!!!!!! > Can tweaking config file(s) be profitable? -- Sure! > Are they necessary? -- *NO WAY*!!!!! Actually, you can use X with no window manager at all. It's weird and awkward, but it works. But you've already started tweaking your fvwm config. That's how it works. In a couple of years yours will be just as ornate as ours. BTW I recently learned that the way to control Firefox is to call it Gecko in Style commands. It's a PITA because it ignores the standard X command line arguments such as "-geometry", tries to be "clever" about placing itself, and uses its title as a message window. Style Gecko IgnoreGravity, !UsePPosition seems to beat it into submission. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-02-27 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vnOgO-65g-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #193149 |
On Tue 27 Feb 2018 at 03:58:30 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > I have days (errrr actually hours) of experience with fvwm. > Experts (<chuckle>) are telling me that significant mods to config > files *MANDATORY*. bull!!!!!!!!!! > > Can tweaking config file(s) be profitable? -- Sure! > Are they necessary? -- *NO WAY*!!!!! I worked long into the night :) to let you know this in a posting 6 hours before you wrote this. > The more I ask for meek user info (and receive *GEEK*speak), the > more impressed I am with just how useful it can be *WITHOUT* any > tweaks. Bear in mind that fvwm has been around for this entire millennium so it must be doing something right. > I'll admit to two mods: > 1. disposed of atrocious wallpaper. I agree. It's easy to have different pictures every time you start/ restart it if you like (desktops), and I use a dynamic background colour (laptops) that gives me the battery state and warns if the temperature exceeds 80/85°C. > 2. coerced visible font size suitable for tri-focal wearing > SeniorCitizen. > > I'll continue to ask for "end user" oriented documentation. > I'll continue to drool over Geek Tweaks I get. > > I'll continue to be impressed with what can be accomplished with > fv[w]m -- "out of the box". Great. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web