Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #185806 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-24 07:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-26 07:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 13 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> - 2017-08-24 07:50 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-24 08:10 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-08-24 08:40 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-24 10:40 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-08-24 11:40 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 07:20 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-08-25 13:00 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-08-25 14:40 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-08-25 14:50 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-08-25 19:00 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 19:50 +0200
Re: which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2017-08-26 07:30 +0200
| From | Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 07:50 +0200 |
| Subject | which display manager would you suggest for Stretch? |
| Message-ID | <uhTbI-2lw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi folks, since kdm is not in anymore I wonder which display manager to consider for Stretch? No assumption about the desktop environment should be made. The local Debian users are free to choose. Of course I saw https://wiki.debian.org/DisplayManager, but it appears to be out-of-date. And it doesn't give a recommendation. Every helpful comment is highly appreciated Harri
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhTv3-2Hg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185806 |
Harald Dunkel composed on 2017-08-24 07:44 (UTC+0200): > since kdm is not in anymore I wonder which display manager > to consider for Stretch? > No assumption about the desktop environment should be made. > The local Debian users are free to choose. > Of course I saw https://wiki.debian.org/DisplayManager, but > it appears to be out-of-date. And it doesn't give a > recommendation. > Every helpful comment is highly appreciated Which DE or WM is your preference? Mine: https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/DebianInstall -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhTY6-2SA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185806 |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> wrote: > Hi folks, > > since kdm is not in anymore I wonder which display manager > to consider for Stretch? > > No assumption about the desktop environment should be made. > The local Debian users are free to choose. > > Of course I saw https://wiki.debian.org/DisplayManager, but > it appears to be out-of-date. And it doesn't give a > recommendation. > > > Every helpful comment is highly appreciated > Harri > Short answer: gdm3 is the most the popular display manager with lightdm, sddm trailing behind. Long answer: I have been in this type of situation many times where I was looking for a recommended(?) tool to accomplish a particular task (ex:- what is the best IDE to write python programs?). One way to address this is to see what tools are currently popular and then start exploring the most popular ones first. Coming back to your question, I did % apt-cache search display manager --names-only | popsort.py 22060 nodm - automatic display manager 21307 wdm - WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look 18484 lxdm - LXDE display manager 10218 slim - desktop-independent graphical login manager for X11 9363 xdm - X display manager 4337 sddm - modern display manager for X11 1999 lightdm - simple display manager 1595 gdm3 - GNOME Display Manager Here the apt-cache command lists the packages with words "display", "manager" in their names. The output is piped to the python script, popsort.py which ranks the lines by popularity (the lower the number, the more popular it is). This shows gdm3 is the most popular one with lightdm and sddm trailing behind. So, you can start exploring them first and see if they fit your needs. The popsort.py utility is written by me. It can be downloaded from https://gitlab.com/d3k2mk7/rutils/blob/master/bin/popsort.py and is documented at http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Sort_output_of_apt-cache_search_by_popularity . I would appreciate if you have any feedback/comments/criticism on this script (no matter how small you think it is). Cheers raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhVQd-43p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185808 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 02:37:41AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: [...] > Long answer: > I have been in this type of situation many times where I was looking > for a recommended(?) tool to accomplish a particular task [...] Thanks for this, it was enlightening and entertaining at the same time. And thanks for popsort! Now I know I'm not as exotic as I thought, wit xdm. One reason less to be arrogant, I guess ;-) Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlmej4gACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaOAwCdFL9MqwAxbYxBVtXF41WckDpj tnAAn0wqFC7t9GHhE5dENPrcGCOl6VaE =lRXx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhWMi-4E5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185808 |
Hi Raju, On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:37:41 -0400 kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote: (...) > The popsort.py utility is written by me. It can be downloaded from > https://gitlab.com/d3k2mk7/rutils/blob/master/bin/popsort.py and is > documented at > http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Sort_output_of_apt-cache_search_by_popularity . > I would appreciate if you have any feedback/comments/criticism on this > script (no matter how small you think it is). very nice indeed, thanks for sharing! Only (very small) "criticism" (just because you were asking): I think the output would be more "intuitive" to read if the most popular package appears in the output first. I think adding a "sorted_lines.reverse()" in sort_lines() just before the "return" statement would do that. But maybe this is only my personal preference at all and other people like it better the way it is. Thanks again and best regards Michael .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. There is an old custom among my people. When a woman saves a man's life, he is grateful. -- Nona, the Kanuto witch woman, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 07:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uifcd-8iW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185813 |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi Raju, > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:37:41 -0400 > kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote: > > (...) >> The popsort.py utility is written by me. It can be downloaded from >> https://gitlab.com/d3k2mk7/rutils/blob/master/bin/popsort.py and is >> documented at >> http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Sort_output_of_apt-cache_search_by_popularity . >> I would appreciate if you have any feedback/comments/criticism on this >> script (no matter how small you think it is). > > very nice indeed, thanks for sharing! You are welcome. > Only (very small) "criticism" (just because you were asking): I think the > output would be more "intuitive" to read if the most popular package > appears in the output first. I think adding a "sorted_lines.reverse()" in > sort_lines() just before the "return" statement would do that. But maybe > this is only my personal preference at all and other people like it > better the way it is. Thanks for the feedback. I added this under a new option, --most-popular-first. So, if you do % apt-cache search display manager --names-only | popsort.py --most-popular-first 1595 gdm3 - GNOME Display Manager 1999 lightdm - simple display manager 4337 sddm - modern display manager for X11 9363 xdm - X display manager 10218 slim - desktop-independent graphical login manager for X11 18484 lxdm - LXDE display manager 21307 wdm - WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look 22060 nodm - automatic display manager it will list the most popular package first. However, I left the default as is. I prefer having the most popular package at the bottom as it minimizes "the eyeball movement". Consider, for example, a command that produces multiple pages of output such as % apt-cache search "^vim-" --names-only | popsort.py To look at a few of the famous packages in this, one has to either scroll up or pipe the output to head. With the current sorting method, you can keep eyes closer to the command line and still get all the important information. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uiiWv-2ar-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185881 |
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:17:10 -0400 kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote: (...) > it will list the most popular package first. However, I left the > default as is. I prefer having the most popular package at the bottom > as it minimizes "the eyeball movement". Consider, for example, a > command that produces multiple pages of output such as > > % apt-cache search "^vim-" --names-only | popsort.py > > To look at a few of the famous packages in this, one has to either > scroll up or pipe the output to head. With the current sorting method, > you can keep eyes closer to the command line and still get all the > important information. Ok, I see.. good point! I admit I did not think of this. Thanks for explaining. Best regards Michael .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. Many Myths are based on truth -- Spock, "The Way to Eden", stardate 5832.3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uikvi-2YQ-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185881 |
On Friday, August 25, 2017 01:17:10 AM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > To look at a few of the famous packages in this, one has to either > scroll up or pipe the output to head. With the current sorting method, > you can keep eyes closer to the command line and still get all the > important information. I'm not the op, but I'd just like to say: good thinking!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uim41-43d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185899 |
On Friday, August 25, 2017 06:59:29 AM rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, August 25, 2017 01:17:10 AM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > To look at a few of the famous packages in this, one has to either > > scroll up or pipe the output to head. With the current sorting method, > > you can keep eyes closer to the command line and still get all the > > important information. > > I'm not the op, but I'd just like to say: good thinking! Oh, on looking again, I remembered a question--what do those numbers represent? When I first saw the list, in order with the higher numbers first, I thought maybe the numbers represented something like number of downloads, but, once I knew the order was in inverse order, I realized that was not the case. What do those numbers represent / where do they come from?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uimdH-47h-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185904 |
Hi, I suppose, it is based on the personal preferences. Many people will use gdm3, as Gnome is the default login manager. However, I believe, that those, who were using kdm (like me) just would not notice, that kdm disappeared, as it will not be deinstalled during full- upgrade. Ok, what else? Well, sddm will not be usable for those people, who are using nvidia's proprietrary driver, as using them, sddm will not start. I am running sddm on my EEEPC 1005HGO, which from the view and setting options I liked very much. However, at last I changed to lightdm, as the starting of sddm on this "slow" system (1,66GHz) is lasting about 1 minute, whilst lightdm is started below 10 seconds. So, lightdm is my personal choice. However, no one is hindered to download kdm from backports, it is running very well on debian/testing. So, hope, it does make things clearer. Best regards Hans
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uiq7D-6u6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185904 |
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:33:00 -0400 rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > Oh, on looking again, I remembered a question--what do those numbers > represent? When I first saw the list, in order with the higher numbers > first, I thought maybe the numbers represented something like number of > downloads, but, once I knew the order was in inverse order, I realized > that was not the case. > > What do those numbers represent / where do they come from? It's the package's position in debian's popularity ranking, I think "dpkg" is no. 1 :) Regards Michael >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-25 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uiqU2-71g-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185904 |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:33 AM, <rhkramer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, August 25, 2017 06:59:29 AM rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, August 25, 2017 01:17:10 AM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> > To look at a few of the famous packages in this, one has to either
>> > scroll up or pipe the output to head. With the current sorting method,
>> > you can keep eyes closer to the command line and still get all the
>> > important information.
>>
>> I'm not the op, but I'd just like to say: good thinking!
>
> Oh, on looking again, I remembered a question--what do those numbers
> represent? When I first saw the list, in order with the higher numbers first, I
> thought maybe the numbers represented something like number of downloads, but,
> once I knew the order was in inverse order, I realized that was not the case.
>
> What do those numbers represent / where do they come from?
>
They are the ranks of the packages based on their popularity [1]. The
data is downloaded from http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst and cached
into ~/.cache/popsort/by_inst [2]. The cool thing with the script is
that it automatically updates the cache file if it is more than a day
old.
[1] The statistics are gathered from report sent by users of the
popularity-contest package. To participate in this, install the
popularity-contest package. Currently it receives around 200,000
submissions.
[2] - Actually, the path is determined by using
fname = os.path.join(
xdg.BaseDirectory.xdg_cache_home,
'popsort', 'by_inst')
but since xdg.BaseDirectory.xdg_cache_home is set to ~/.cache by
default, it boils down to ~/.cache/popsort/by_inst .
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-26 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uiBPs-5xW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #185808 |
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 02:37:41 CEST kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > gdm3 is the most the popular display manager with lightdm, sddm trailing > behind. I choose kde desktop during installation, and sddm whas installed. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Sent from my brain using neurons fueled by glucose. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ⠈⠳⣄
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web