Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #185115 > unrolled thread

Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline Robert Villeneuve <robino583056@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-13 15:00 +0200
    [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline) "Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)" <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2017-08-13 16:30 +0200
      Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a  queen. Pauline) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2017-08-13 16:50 +0200
        Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a  queen. Pauline) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-13 17:00 +0200
        Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature "Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)" <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2017-08-14 04:30 +0200
      Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2017-08-13 17:30 +0200
        Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature "Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)" <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2017-08-14 04:10 +0200
      Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a  queen. Pauline) Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2017-08-14 16:20 +0200
        Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline) deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 16:40 +0200

#185115 — Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

hi
 

    On Sunday, August 6, 2017 6:02 PM, Pauline Richarsdson <42CEFORCE@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
 

 

Would you be my king?  
http://bitly.com/2vDwoQj

   

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#185119 — [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline)

Robert Villeneuve <robino583056@yahoo.ca> 께서 쓰시길,
 《記事 全文 <1249917413.723454.1502628018251@mail.yahoo.com> 에서》:

> Would you be my king?  
> http://bitly.com/2vDwoQj

By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...

Sincerely,

-- 
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185120 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline)

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:21:04PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:

[snipped spam]

> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature.

It came from a real person so why wouldn't it? DKIM says nothing of
content.

> Please explain to me why the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...

A spammer sent out a spam run (this "would you be my king?" then URL
to questionable site nonsense) using the debian-user address as the
from address. Some of the hapless confused recipients replied to it,
thus their reply ends up on the mailing list.

It would be best not to reply to it (unless you feel like replying
off-list to the person explaining that they are replying to spam),
as the sender won't see your reply and no one on this list can do
anything about it.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

> I'd be interested to hear any (even two word) reviews of their sofas…
Provides seating.        — Andy Davidson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185121 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 02:44:56PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:21:04PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
> 
> [snipped spam]
> 
> > By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature.
> 
> It came from a real person so why wouldn't it? DKIM says nothing of
> content.
> 
> > Please explain to me why the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...
> 
> A spammer sent out a spam run (this "would you be my king?" then URL
> to questionable site nonsense) using the debian-user address as the
> from address. Some of the hapless confused recipients replied to it,
> thus their reply ends up on the mailing list.

I have the hunch that it's a (faked, in the sense that the copy hasn't
been sent to debian-user) Cc: -- a From: might trigger the spam filter
at the victim's site (bad SPF and/or DKIM). But then, maybe not...

> It would be best not to reply to it (unless you feel like replying
> off-list to the person explaining that they are replying to spam),
> as the sender won't see your reply and no one on this list can do
> anything about it.

I do that from time to time, when I have a whiff of evidence that the
victim might understand what's going on. Never got a reply so far
(still curious :)

Cheers
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlmQaBIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kY1JACdGN/Y4cw5gP3RZ3zyufaMoOYS
TvsAnjZCeCQVFsii/3J68udK2cRkoDuK
=IChh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185139 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature

> It would be best not to reply to it (unless you feel like replying

Thanks, Andy!!!

-- 
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185123 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Byung-Hee HWANG [2017-08-13 23:21:04+09] wrote:

> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
> the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...

Please don't quote spam messages, or even better, don't reply at all.
Some of us are trying to train our spam filters and now your message has
partly spam and partly non-spam content. I decided to classify your
message spam.

-- 
/// Teemu Likonen   - .-..   <https://keybase.io/tlikonen> //
// PGP: 4E10 55DC 84E9 DFF6 13D7 8557 719D 69D3 2453 9450 ///

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185136 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature

Dear Teemu,

Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> 께서 쓰시길,
 《記事 全文 <87h8xbcwth.fsf@mithlond.arda> 에서》:

> Byung-Hee HWANG [2017-08-13 23:21:04+09] wrote:
>
>> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
>> the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...
>
> Please don't quote spam messages, or even better, don't reply at all.
> Some of us are trying to train our spam filters and now your message has
> partly spam and partly non-spam content. I decided to classify your
> message spam.

Yes, i got it, thanks for explaination!!!

-- 
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185182 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline)

On Dom, 13 Ago 2017, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
> the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...

I have received plenty of spams with valid DKIM signatures. As long as  
you have a domain, adding DKIM is pretty straightforward. It can be  
used to detect fake forgeries (a spammer sending an email claiming to  
be from @paypal.com, for instance), but it doesn't really help with  
spam detection if it's joe@buymycrappyproducts.com sending unsolicited  
emails advertising his crappy products.

-- 
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
eduardo@kalinowski.com.br

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#185188 — Re: [OT] Valid DKIM signature (Was: Re: I want to rejoice like a queen. Pauline)

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:

> I have received plenty of spams with valid DKIM signatures. As long as
> you have a domain, adding DKIM is pretty straightforward.

Perhaps one should look into what valid DKIM sig means, perhaps it is not
exactly the same what you understand.

https://mandrill.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205582267-About-SPF-and-DKIM
https://blog.returnpath.com/how-to-explain-dkim-in-plain-english-2/
etc.

it may be valid message but still spam.

regadrs

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web