Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #188926 > unrolled thread

No KODI for buster?

Started byMan_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
First post2017-11-13 02:00 +0100
Last post2017-11-13 13:30 +0100
Articles 9 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  No KODI for buster? Man_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> - 2017-11-13 02:00 +0100
    Re: No KODI for buster? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 02:50 +0100
      Re: No KODI for buster? Man_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> - 2017-11-13 03:40 +0100
        Re: No KODI for buster? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-11-13 04:10 +0100
          Re: No KODI for buster? Man_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> - 2017-11-13 05:20 +0100
            Re: No KODI for buster? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 11:40 +0100
              Re: No KODI for buster? A_Man_Without_Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> - 2017-11-13 13:30 +0100
    Re: No KODI for buster? Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2017-11-13 10:10 +0100
      Re: No KODI for buster? A_Man_Without_Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> - 2017-11-13 13:30 +0100

#188926 — No KODI for buster?

FromMan_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-13 02:00 +0100
SubjectNo KODI for buster?
Message-ID<uLbgt-7oz-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

There is no KODI for the buster?

How come?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#188927

FromRoberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>
Date2017-11-13 02:50 +0100
Message-ID<uLc2R-7UD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188926
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> There is no KODI for the buster?
> 
> How come?
> 
> 
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188928

FromMan_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-13 03:40 +0100
Message-ID<uLcPg-8r6-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188927
On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There is no KODI for the buster?
>>
>> How come?
>>
>>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi
>


Oh no......

Not considered???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188929

FromThe Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
Date2017-11-13 04:10 +0100
Message-ID<uLdii-nV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188928

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2017-11-12 at 21:37, Man_without_clue wrote:

> On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> There is no KODI for the buster?
>>> 
>>> How come?
>> 
>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi
> 
> Oh no......
> 
> Not considered???

What that means (as I understand matters) is "Because this other reason
means this package couldn't make it in anyway, the automatic tools did
not consider whether or not to include it".

The other reason is cited on that page: one of the build dependencies of
kodi, in this case apparently libcec (libcec4 / libcec-dev), has a
problem which is keeping it out.

Presumably, once that other package gets fixed, it will make it in, and
kodi will also get back in at that point.

-- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188932

FromMan_without_clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-13 05:20 +0100
Message-ID<uLeo1-18f-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188929

On 2017/11/13 12:04, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2017-11-12 at 21:37, Man_without_clue wrote:
>
>> On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> There is no KODI for the buster?
>>>>
>>>> How come?
>>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi
>> Oh no......
>>
>> Not considered???
> What that means (as I understand matters) is "Because this other reason
> means this package couldn't make it in anyway, the automatic tools did
> not consider whether or not to include it".
>
> The other reason is cited on that page: one of the build dependencies of
> kodi, in this case apparently libcec (libcec4 / libcec-dev), has a
> problem which is keeping it out.
>
> Presumably, once that other package gets fixed, it will make it in, and
> kodi will also get back in at that point.
>

oh,  ok, thank you.

Hope it will be back soon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188942

FromJonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
Date2017-11-13 11:40 +0100
Message-ID<uLkjM-4SN-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188932
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:17:23PM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>oh,  ok, thank you.
>
>Hope it will be back soon.

THe root issue  that needs fixing is this one
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853485

Which has apparently been fixed in a package upload to experimental. So
Kodi should be unblocked once the maintainer makes a normal upload to
unstable.

-- 

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188945

FromA_Man_Without_Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-13 13:30 +0100
Message-ID<uLm2d-63y-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188942
On 11/13/2017 07:38 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:17:23PM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>> oh,  ok, thank you.
>>
>> Hope it will be back soon.
> 
> THe root issue  that needs fixing is this one
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853485
> 
> Which has apparently been fixed in a package upload to experimental. So
> Kodi should be unblocked once the maintainer makes a normal upload to
> unstable.
> 


Great. I will wait.

Thanks for info.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188940

FromFloris <jkfloris@dds.nl>
Date2017-11-13 10:10 +0100
Message-ID<uLiUG-46y-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188926
Op Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:51:17 +0100 schreef Man_without_clue  
<love.chaser@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> There is no KODI for the buster?
>
> How come?
>
>

If you are brave enough to try the deb-multimedia repo has Kodi:
http://www.deb-multimedia.org/

Note: these packages can/will sometimes break your system or make an  
update impossible.

Floris

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#188946

FromA_Man_Without_Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-13 13:30 +0100
Message-ID<uLm2e-63y-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188940
On 11/13/2017 06:00 PM, Floris wrote:
> Op Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:51:17 +0100 schreef Man_without_clue
> <love.chaser@gmail.com>:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There is no KODI for the buster?
>>
>> How come?
>>
>>
> 
> If you are brave enough to try the deb-multimedia repo has Kodi:
> http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
> 
> Note: these packages can/will sometimes break your system or make an
> update impossible.
> 
> Floris
> 


NO, I will stay away from that.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web