Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #188987 > unrolled thread

gpg fools amanda 3.5

Started bykjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
First post2017-11-14 20:50 +0100
Last post2017-11-14 22:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  gpg fools amanda 3.5 kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2017-11-14 20:50 +0100
    Re: gpg fools amanda 3.5 deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-11-14 22:50 +0100

#188987 — gpg fools amanda 3.5

Fromkjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
Date2017-11-14 20:50 +0100
Subjectgpg fools amanda 3.5
Message-ID<uLPnA-89k-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
"Always" I have encrypted amand backup with gpg.
Recently, after upgrade amanda to version 1:3.5-2 I noticed that amanda
'does not work' - it hangs for (near) infinity; no files in holding
directory etc.
As googling gives me no useful results, I assumed that it is rather
something wrong with my configuration than with amanda.

I noticed in logs these lines:
/var/log/amanda/log.error/localhost._var_lib_samba.1.20170924140809.errout:? gpg: automatically retrieved 'amand@alfa' via Local
they were earlier, but did not hurt.
I tried to remove them
"quiet" option to gpg.conf did not help, so I had to do something like
gpg -e 2>/dev/null
and voilà - amanda works and create files in holding space.
Now I have question
1. does amanda should be more tolerant?
2. does gpg should be quiet?
3. both?

Should I fill bug report? If so, to which package?
KJ

-- 
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#188993

Fromdeloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
Date2017-11-14 22:50 +0100
Message-ID<uLRfH-13F-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#188987
Kamil Jońca wrote:

> "Always" I have encrypted amand backup with gpg.
> Recently, after upgrade amanda to version 1:3.5-2 I noticed that amanda
> 'does not work' - it hangs for (near) infinity; no files in holding
> directory etc.
> As googling gives me no useful results, I assumed that it is rather
> something wrong with my configuration than with amanda.
> 
> I noticed in logs these lines:
> /var/log/amanda/log.error/localhost._var_lib_samba.1.20170924140809.errout:?
> gpg: automatically retrieved 'amand@alfa' via Local they were earlier, but
> did not hurt. I tried to remove them
> "quiet" option to gpg.conf did not help, so I had to do something like
> gpg -e 2>/dev/null
> and voilà - amanda works and create files in holding space.
> Now I have question
> 1. does amanda should be more tolerant?
> 2. does gpg should be quiet?
> 3. both?
> 
> Should I fill bug report? If so, to which package?

Hi, please note that GPG was bumped to v2 which has different format and
features. Check your gpg version and if this is the problem, report against
amanda or adjust your settings.

regards

PS: No idea what amanda is, but dealt recently with gpg in depth

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web