Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180263 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-19 10:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-03 05:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 12 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Debian hardware compatibility John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> - 2017-04-19 10:00 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-04-19 12:20 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 17:20 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> - 2017-04-20 14:20 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-21 00:50 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-20 02:40 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> - 2017-04-20 07:20 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-04-20 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility solitone <solitone@mail.com> - 2017-04-20 14:50 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-04-20 16:40 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-21 01:00 +0200
Re: Debian hardware compatibility Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-05-03 05:50 +0200
| From | John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Debian hardware compatibility |
| Message-ID | <txSGW-FS-149@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
I'm getting a new workstation. Proposed specs are here: https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/7MCfjc I tried to find out if my new hardware would run Debian stable, but couldn't confirm. CPU is Intel Core i7-7700K on an Asus STRIX Z270F mobo. I'm planning to drive two monitors from the onboard graphics controller, one via DVI the other via HDMI. Will Debian (w/ KDE Plasma) run on my new kit, does anybody know? Cheers, John. -- E: jj5@jj5.net P: +61 4 3505 7839 W: https://www.jj5.net/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txUSl-2dE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180263 |
John Elliot V wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --------------50ECA958FA859516FB3191E9 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I'm getting a new workstation. Proposed specs are here: > > https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/7MCfjc > > I tried to find out if my new hardware would run Debian stable, but > couldn't confirm. > > CPU is Intel Core i7-7700K on an Asus STRIX Z270F mobo. I'm planning to > drive two monitors from the onboard graphics controller, one via DVI the > other via HDMI. > > Will Debian (w/ KDE Plasma) run on my new kit, does anybody know? > I don't see anything that screams "linux incompatibility" on that list. Might have some "fun" with the graphics, but then I've not kept up on Intel's offerings in that regard. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txZyG-531-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180265 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
I don't think you'll have any issue with that set of hardware. If you've never done water cooling before then you'll be very happy with your H80i purchase. I have a Corsair Hydro H100i in both my Linux and Windows boxes and absolutely love them. I'll never do anything but CPU water cooling anymore. Also I would recommend the 850 Evo vs the 850 Pro. The pro's are typically more expensive and only offer slightly better write performance [1]. I've bought over 10 850 Evo's over the last few years and never been dissatisfied with any of them. Just my personal opinion, but thought I would mention it. Thanks, Joshua Schaeffer [1] http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Samsung-850-Pro-256GB-vs-Samsung-850-Evo-250GB/2385vs2977 On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > John Elliot V wrote: > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --------------50ECA958FA859516FB3191E9 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > I'm getting a new workstation. Proposed specs are here: > > > > https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/7MCfjc > > > > I tried to find out if my new hardware would run Debian stable, but > > couldn't confirm. > > > > CPU is Intel Core i7-7700K on an Asus STRIX Z270F mobo. I'm planning to > > drive two monitors from the onboard graphics controller, one via DVI the > > other via HDMI. > > > > Will Debian (w/ KDE Plasma) run on my new kit, does anybody know? > > > > I don't see anything that screams "linux incompatibility" on that list. > Might have some "fun" with the graphics, but then I've not kept up on > Intel's offerings in that regard. > > > -- > |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 > |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert > |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281 > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyje1-o7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180281 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 20/04/17 01:14, Joshua Schaeffer wrote: > I would recommend the 850 Evo vs the 850 Pro Thanks for the tip. I had considered the Evo but this: https://www.kosagi.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=421 had me a little spooked. I've already parted with my money for the Pro. I've made bigger mistakes in life... :) -- E: jj5@jj5.net P: +61 4 3505 7839 W: https://www.jj5.net/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-21 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyt3H-6m1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180325 |
On 21/04/17 00:15, John Elliot V wrote: > On 20/04/17 01:14, Joshua Schaeffer wrote: >> I would recommend the 850 Evo vs the 850 Pro > Thanks for the tip. I had considered the Evo but this: > https://www.kosagi.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=421 > had me a little spooked. That is the 840 Evo. Completely different animal. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ty8iB-1OD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180263 |
On 19/04/17 19:52, John Elliot V wrote: > I'm getting a new workstation. Proposed specs are here: > https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/7MCfjc > I tried to find out if my new hardware would run Debian stable, but > couldn't confirm. > CPU is Intel Core i7-7700K on an Asus STRIX Z270F mobo. I'm planning to > drive two monitors from the onboard graphics controller, one via DVI the > other via HDMI. > Will Debian (w/ KDE Plasma) run on my new kit, does anybody know? > Cheers, > John. Both your 7th generation Kaby Lake and the previous 6th generation Skylake have serious problems with older kernels such as the 3.16.39 in jessie, especially with integrated graphics. Older kernels also likely lack support for the i219v ethernet adapter on this board (but it is on the e1000e module support list for later kernels). You can get 4.9.18 from backports, but why not just install stretch from RC3? stretch is close to release. HD 630 iGPU is working fine for me with XFCE on an i7 7700 with one HDMI output on 4.9.18-1 amd64. I am on sid, but stretch has the same kernel. I purged xserver-xorg-video-intel because the modesetting driver is preferred for modern hardware. Asus UEFI BIOS (H110I-PLUS BIOS 3202) defaults to incorrect turbo boost multipliers but I was able to manually set the correct "Per CPU" values in the BIOS. For a 7700K, these should be 45/44/44/44 if you are not overclocking (base clock 100MHz): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Elliot V <jj5@jj5.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tycFz-4MR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180301 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 20/04/17 10:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > why not just install stretch from RC3? stretch is close to release. Sounds like a good idea! Thanks Ben. Will stretch RC3 smoothly transition to stable (with an apt-get dist-upgrade) when stretch is released? > HD 630 iGPU is working fine for me with XFCE on an i7 7700 with one HDMI > output on 4.9.18-1 amd64. I am on sid, but stretch has the same kernel. > I purged xserver-xorg-video-intel because the modesetting driver is > preferred for modern hardware. Will that apply to me? I.e. I should purge xserver-xorg-video-intel? > Asus UEFI BIOS (H110I-PLUS BIOS 3202) defaults to incorrect turbo boost > multipliers but I was able to manually set the correct "Per CPU" values > in the BIOS. For a 7700K, these should be 45/44/44/44 if you are not > overclocking (base clock 100MHz): > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake OK, cool, thanks. ...and what if I am overclocking? I've never overclocked a system before, but I heard I could safely overclock my new CPU to 5GHz, which sounded pretty exciting..! :P -- E: jj5@jj5.net P: +61 4 3505 7839 W: https://www.jj5.net/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyj4l-kL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180310 |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:12:33PM +1000, John Elliot V wrote: > Will stretch RC3 smoothly transition to stable (with an apt-get > dist-upgrade) when stretch is released? Yes. In fact there's a very strong possibility you won't even need to do a whole dist-upgrade. A simple "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" may work, if the freeze proceeds smoothly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | solitone <solitone@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyjH3-ye-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180324 |
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:07:51 CEST Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:12:33PM +1000, John Elliot V wrote: > > Will stretch RC3 smoothly transition to stable (with an apt-get > > dist-upgrade) when stretch is released? > > Yes. In fact there's a very strong possibility you won't even need to > do a whole dist-upgrade. A simple "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" > may work, if the freeze proceeds smoothly. This was exactly what happened to me when jessie transitioned from testing to stable. I would expect stretch be the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | songbird <songbird@anthive.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-20 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tylpw-1FW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180310 |
John Elliot V wrote: > On 20/04/17 10:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> why not just install stretch from RC3? stretch is close to release. > > Sounds like a good idea! Thanks Ben. > > Will stretch RC3 smoothly transition to stable (with an apt-get > dist-upgrade) when stretch is released? if you install it as stretch (by name) then it will not need anything at all to remain as is until you choose to make it something else. songbird
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-21 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tytdn-6pa-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180310 |
On 20/04/17 17:12, John Elliot V wrote: > Will stretch RC3 smoothly transition to stable (with an apt-get > dist-upgrade) when stretch is released? You should not need to do anything. When stretch is released as stable, you will already be on it. Just make sure that, when stretch is released, you have the security repo so you start getting stable security updates. > Will that apply to me? I.e. I should purge xserver-xorg-video-intel? It is recommended. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-03 05:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCTsC-7yN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #180301 |
On 20/04/17 12:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Asus UEFI BIOS (H110I-PLUS BIOS 3202) defaults to incorrect turbo boost > multipliers but I was able to manually set the correct "Per CPU" values > in the BIOS. For a 7700K, these should be 45/44/44/44 if you are not > overclocking (base clock 100MHz): > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake For the record, upgrading to H110I-PLUS BIOS 3402 fixed the turbo boost multipliers. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web