Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178273 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-28 16:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-28 23:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
No sound Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 16:30 +0100
Re: No sound Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-28 18:40 +0100
Re: No sound Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: No sound darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: No sound David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
Re: No sound Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 19:40 +0100
Re: No sound Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-03-01 11:50 +0100
Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 17:50 +0100
[solved] Re: No sound Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 21:30 +0100
Re: [solved] Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:30 +0100
Re: [solved] Re: No sound GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-28 23:20 +0100
Re: [solved] Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 23:40 +0100
No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-03 02:00 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 12:00 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 13:20 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-03-03 14:20 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 14:50 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:50 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 21:00 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-04 12:30 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-04 16:10 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-03-04 14:40 +0100
Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-03-03 15:00 +0100
Re: No sound Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 23:30 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-04 12:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT |
| Message-ID | <thg2R-8pW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178380 |
The Wanderer: > On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote: > >> The Wanderer wrote: >> >>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an >>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message >>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know >>> how to do this. (Or be using a mail client which does permit >>> that.) >> >> But why would you do this. You could simply press new and start a >> thread with your question > > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing > your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject > line, et cetera). > > Yes, this apparently is enough of a convenience factor to affect > people's behavior. > Since you guys now have hijacked the thread it is ok for me to continue On my second try to address a related issue I "forwarded" to the list the previous text as part of a reference with a new subject. As I use a non-html editor, txt comes in and txt comes out, I forget that the headers are hidden, but never thought they were included in forward, only in replies. It is good to know that mozilla in providing with a clean email gui does such things. Also if you use reply instead of reply-all or reply-list the headers that are picked up "by the list" are threading the messages. So it is partly the list-laundering activity that creates all the confusion. I'm willing to bet that in interpersonal exchange some of those messages wouldn't be threaded. But I've seen it happen both ways, Re: same-subject unthreaded and Re: different-subject threaded. So it must have to do with some mailing systems stripping headers and some that don't do it, and effective stripping goes two ways. Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist? -- "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-04 16:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT |
| Message-ID | <thjtM-2xJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178385 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +0000, GiaThnYgeia wrote: [...] > Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist? To round-up this thread's recursive meta-hijacking: oh, yes, they definitely exist. There are a couple of providers out there keeping the service up, my favourite being eternal september: http://www.eternal-september.org/ Yes. Real NNTP. Gmane could be interesting too -- they offer (among other things) mailing lists via nntp. Regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAli6104ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYr/wCcC1TUgngHl++zKLk24JeGXDKk hXsAnjic0xBZeVgfuNMnoG/H3Ce4biLq =nDFk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-04 14:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT |
| Message-ID | <thi4F-1jX-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178380 |
On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote: > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing > your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject > line, et cetera). > > Yes, this apparently is enough of a convenience factor to affect > people's behavior. Just to add $0.02 (I don't know who it belongs to, so didn't call it "my $0.02")--in kmail, just right click on the address to which you want to send the new email, and choose "New Message to" from the context menu...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 15:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT |
| Message-ID | <tgVUt-20d-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178364 |
Op 03-03-17 om 14:15 schreef Greg Wooledge: > Or manually remove the In-Reply-To: header, if your mail user agent > permits you to do this. > Don't forget the References: header. Regards, Frank
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfXOF-1BX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178273 |
On 2/28/17, Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> wrote: > Please help with no sound issue. I installed the following packages: > > alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui > gstreamer1.0-alsa > libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev > libasound2-plugins > libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio > > , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still: Hi, Rodolpho and All :) I've repeatedly lost sound myself the last year so'ish. For me, it started when there was a change in Pulseaudio's relationship in Xfce4 somehow. Sound would occasionally work on new installs (debootstrap) but would then fail soon after. I THINK those fails came immediately after mass day-to-day upgrades in Sid Unstable. I've done all kinds of playing with anything I could find sound related via "apt-cache search" and repeatedly had fail after fail after... heartbreaking... fail. About a month ago, I HAD to get it working to process some important video sound bytes so I really dug in about trying to find something. I simultaneously came across aumix via "apt-cache search" while aumix was receiving a couple mentions on this list in sound related threads. I installed "aumix", and it worked.... once. And only once. The first time the interface came up, it had one column that was turned off. I bumped it up and miraculously had sound. On the next reboot, no sound over and over. Because aumix worked that one time when nothing had for pushing close to a year, I went back in with aumix as a search keyword. I found aumix-gtk and so tried installing that, *too*.. That still brings up an extremely small interface, but it has more columns. ONE OF THOSE COLUMNS... is something called Pcm2. That one is ALWAYS at zero after reboots. I bump that over to 100.... and have sound every time now. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME! Yayhoo!!!!! Maybe addressing that "Pcm2" setting in the other various favored sound [controllers] will slow down sound problems? If anyone uses aumix and additionally also installs that aumix-gtk, the terminal command is still just the "aumix". Its developers are my #Heros! #TrueStory! It's CRUCIAL that my sound work right now, and that was the avenue that worked to date... on this particular... for now anyway. Hope that helps someone.. *grin* Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * runs with crochet hook *
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfYro-24R-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #178298 |
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > Sid Unstable give me a break!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web