Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #178273 > unrolled thread

No sound

Started byRodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com>
First post2017-02-28 16:30 +0100
Last post2017-02-28 23:30 +0100
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  No sound Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 16:30 +0100
    Re: No sound Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-02-28 18:40 +0100
      Re: No sound Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-28 19:00 +0100
        Re: No sound darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 19:10 +0100
    Re: No sound David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
    Re: No sound Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-28 18:50 +0100
    Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 19:40 +0100
      Re: No sound Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-03-01 11:50 +0100
        Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 17:50 +0100
    [solved] Re: No sound Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 21:30 +0100
      Re: [solved] Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:30 +0100
      Re: [solved] Re: No sound GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-28 23:20 +0100
        Re: [solved] Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 23:40 +0100
          No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-03 02:00 +0100
            Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 12:00 +0100
              Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 13:20 +0100
                Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-03-03 14:20 +0100
                  Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 14:50 +0100
                    Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:50 +0100
                      Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 21:00 +0100
                        Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-04 12:30 +0100
                          Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-04 16:10 +0100
                        Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-03-04 14:40 +0100
                  Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-03-03 15:00 +0100
    Re: No sound Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
      Re: No sound deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 23:30 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#178385 — Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

FromGiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org>
Date2017-03-04 12:30 +0100
SubjectRe: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT
Message-ID<thg2R-8pW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178380
The Wanderer:
> On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote:
> 
>> The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an 
>>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message
>>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know
>>> how to do this. (Or be using a mail client which does permit
>>> that.)
>>
>> But why would you do this. You could simply press new and start a
>> thread with your question
> 
> Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject
> line, et cetera).
> 
> Yes, this apparently is enough of a convenience factor to affect
> people's behavior.
> 

Since you guys now have hijacked the thread it is ok for me to continue

On my second try to address a related issue I "forwarded" to the list
the previous text as part of a reference with a new subject.  As I use a
non-html editor, txt comes in and txt comes out, I forget that the
headers are hidden, but never thought they were included in forward,
only in replies.  It is good to know that mozilla in providing with a
clean email gui does such things.
Also if you use reply instead of reply-all or reply-list the headers
that are picked up "by the list" are threading the messages.  So it is
partly the list-laundering activity that creates all the confusion.
I'm willing to bet that in interpersonal exchange some of those messages
wouldn't be threaded.  But I've seen it happen both ways, Re:
same-subject unthreaded and Re: different-subject threaded.  So it must
have to do with some mailing systems stripping headers and some that
don't do it, and effective stripping goes two ways.

Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist?


-- 
 "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#178392 — Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

From<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date2017-03-04 16:10 +0100
SubjectRe: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT
Message-ID<thjtM-2xJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178385
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +0000, GiaThnYgeia wrote:

[...]

> Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist?

To round-up this thread's recursive meta-hijacking:
oh, yes, they definitely exist. There are a couple of
providers out there keeping the service up, my favourite
being eternal september:

  http://www.eternal-september.org/

Yes. Real NNTP.

Gmane could be interesting too -- they offer (among other
things) mailing lists via nntp.

Regards
- -- t

  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli6104ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYr/wCcC1TUgngHl++zKLk24JeGXDKk
hXsAnjic0xBZeVgfuNMnoG/H3Ce4biLq
=nDFk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#178390 — Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

Fromrhkramer@gmail.com
Date2017-03-04 14:40 +0100
SubjectRe: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT
Message-ID<thi4F-1jX-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178380
On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject
> line, et cetera).
> 
> Yes, this apparently is enough of a convenience factor to affect
> people's behavior.

Just to add $0.02 (I don't know who it belongs to, so didn't call it "my 
$0.02")--in kmail, just right click on the address to which you want to send 
the new email, and choose "New Message to" from the context menu...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#178366 — Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

FromFrank <zuiderduin@gmx.com>
Date2017-03-03 15:00 +0100
SubjectRe: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT
Message-ID<tgVUt-20d-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178364
Op 03-03-17 om 14:15 schreef Greg Wooledge:
> Or manually remove the In-Reply-To: header, if your mail user agent
> permits you to do this.
>
Don't forget the References: header.

Regards,
Frank

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#178298

FromCindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
Message-ID<tfXOF-1BX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178273
On 2/28/17, Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:
>
>  alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui
> gstreamer1.0-alsa
>  libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev
> libasound2-plugins
>  libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio
>
> , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:


Hi, Rodolpho and All :)

I've repeatedly lost sound myself the last year so'ish. For me, it
started when there was a change in Pulseaudio's relationship in Xfce4
somehow.

Sound would occasionally work on new installs (debootstrap) but would
then fail soon after. I THINK those fails came immediately after mass
day-to-day upgrades in Sid Unstable. I've done all kinds of playing
with anything I could find sound related via "apt-cache search" and
repeatedly had fail after fail after... heartbreaking... fail.

About a month ago, I HAD to get it working to process some important
video sound bytes so I really dug in about trying to find something. I
simultaneously came across aumix via "apt-cache search" while aumix
was receiving a couple mentions on this list in sound related threads.

I installed "aumix", and it worked.... once. And only once.

The first time the interface came up, it had one column that was
turned off. I bumped it up and miraculously had sound. On the next
reboot, no sound over and over.

Because aumix worked that one time when nothing had for pushing close
to a year, I went back in with aumix as a search keyword. I found
aumix-gtk and so tried installing that, *too*.. That still brings up
an extremely small interface, but it has more columns.

ONE OF THOSE COLUMNS... is something called Pcm2. That one is ALWAYS
at zero after reboots. I bump that over to 100.... and have sound
every time now.

EVERY. SINGLE. TIME!

Yayhoo!!!!!

Maybe addressing that "Pcm2" setting in the other various favored
sound [controllers] will slow down sound problems?

If anyone uses aumix and additionally also installs that aumix-gtk,
the terminal command is still just the "aumix".

Its developers are my #Heros! #TrueStory! It's CRUCIAL that my sound
work right now, and that was the avenue that worked to date... on this
particular... for now anyway.

Hope that helps someone.. *grin*

Cindy :)

-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA

* runs with crochet hook *

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#178300

Fromdeloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-28 23:30 +0100
Message-ID<tfYro-24R-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#178298
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:

> Sid Unstable

give me a break!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web