Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #177655 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-10 21:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-12 22:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 9 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Before I install Debian Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-02-10 21:50 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2017-02-10 22:00 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2017-02-11 22:30 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> - 2017-02-12 04:00 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 11:20 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-12 14:10 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-02-12 14:50 +0100
Re: Before I install Debian Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 21:50 +0100
Slight correction was Re: Before I install Debian Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 22:20 +0100
| From | Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-10 21:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Before I install Debian |
| Message-ID | <t9qiJ-8mb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: > All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available with > Debian? No. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-10 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9qsq-8pJ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177655 |
On 02/10/2017 03:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: > >> All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available with >> Debian? > No. > > Grüße, > Sven. > Have you looked at Master PDF Editor 4? --doug -- Blessed are the peacemakers...for they shall be shot at from both sides.--A.M,Greeley
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9Np0-5NH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177657 |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:54:34PM -0500, Doug wrote: > > > On 02/10/2017 03:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > >John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: > > > >>All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available with > >>Debian? > >No. > > > >Grüße, > >Sven. > > > Have you looked at Master PDF Editor 4? It's better than Adobe in that they have a current version for linux. They are, however, closed source. -- Bob Holtzman "Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 04:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9Sym-t0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177713 |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:13:20 -0700 Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:54:34PM -0500, Doug wrote: > > > > > > On 02/10/2017 03:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > > >John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: > > > > > >>All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available > > >>with Debian? > > >No. > > > > > >Grüße, > > >Sven. > > > > > Have you looked at Master PDF Editor 4? > > It's better than Adobe in that they have a current version for linux. > They are, however, closed source. > I think the main point is being missed. I have Okular and xpdf. The company's software would only work with Adobe. As for the edition 7 web site I don't remember where I found it. I can look again if it is neededful. -- John Culleton Wexfordpress Book design and indexing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9Zqa-52B-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177727 |
On Sunday 12 February 2017 02:49:41 John Culleton wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:13:20 -0700 > > Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:54:34PM -0500, Doug wrote: > > > On 02/10/2017 03:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > > > >John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: > > > >>All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available > > > >>with Debian? > > > > > > > >No. > > > > > > > >Grüße, > > > >Sven. > > > > > > Have you looked at Master PDF Editor 4? > > > > It's better than Adobe in that they have a current version for linux. > > They are, however, closed source. > > I think the main point is being missed. Yes, by you. You asked whether Adobe Acrobat, which is a proprietary program belonging to Adobe, would run on Debian. Sven said no. Other people found that too short and are trying to find a way to help. You have your answer. Modern Adobe Acrobat will not run on Debian. You can either try out some of the suggestions or not try out some of the suggestions. But you have your answer. Lisi > I have Okular and xpdf. The > company's software would only work with Adobe. As for the edition 7 > web site I don't remember where I found it. I can look > again if it is neededful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 14:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ta24F-6HV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177735 |
Lisi Reisz: >> I think the main point is being missed. > > Yes, by you. You asked whether Adobe Acrobat, which is a proprietary program > belonging to Adobe, would run on Debian. Sven said no. > > Other people found that too short and are trying to find a way to help. You > have your answer. Modern Adobe Acrobat will not run on Debian. if one was looking for salespeople in debian to satisfy their minimum expectations in order to buy it, he/she would have missed the whole point. 1 A tax reviewer that would only "sell" service if the customer satisfied their demands is one that would least likely have human input in whether what is submitted or not is valid. The machine will take as valid an expense of 129,99 as 12999 if that is how it was entered, your tax will be less and it will not be the adobe client's fault. A real auditor would inquire on the validity of a 13 thousand gas receipt. 2 The security of your private tax information will be transmitted through win-dose pseudo-security by a pseudo software's internal encoding to some insecure server (unless it is based on linux which can handle security well from the doorstep and inwards). 3 I think the decision of the system should be based on a better and wider overall look of the big picture. These good people here are not able to make tax-related decisions for anyone. I am among those who have been helped and eager to know enough to help others. The problem with adobe is not one that could be addressed here, but I am trying to establish that the problem is not with adobe's products but with those who have taken the blackmail and internalized it. Imagine being on death row for all the wrong reasons, for not shooting the deputy only the sheriff, and the only way to appeal is by submitting a form through acrobat. And there may come a day where running and distributing linux may become illegal. How many of us will still be here to help. > You can either try out some of the suggestions or not try out some of the > suggestions. But you have your answer. Yes. > Lisi Doesn't that android thing have acrobat in it, probably for a fee? I would just get a second hand generic tablet just for that purpose and leave it half charged and off the remaining time. It would be more secure than trying to keep your private information in the online pc you use daily. If you can't spare 50 bucks for a tablet chances are you don't need an accounting service or filing taxes probably :) Katrin PS Have you watched Brazil? Are you a Microsoft executive? -- "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ta2Hn-6VL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177735 |
Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday 12 February 2017 02:49:41 John Culleton wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:13:20 -0700 Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:54:34PM -0500, Doug wrote: >>>> On 02/10/2017 03:45 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>>> John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com> wrote: >>>>>> All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available >>>>>> with Debian? >>>>> No. >> I think the main point is being missed. > Yes, by you. You asked whether Adobe Acrobat, which is a proprietary program > belonging to Adobe, would run on Debian. Sven said no. No, the question was, if it is available "with Debian", not if it would run "on Debian". And the answer is "no", it is and was never available with (or from) Debian. It is also no longer officially supported or available for Linux from Adobe on their official website. Go to https://get.adobe.com/de/reader/otherversions/ and try to select "Linux" as OS. And the Debian package on their FTP server, containing an old and outdated, security vulnerable version, may only still be there because someone forgot to remove it, it could be gone tomorrow. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ta9fQ-2ui-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177741 |
On Sunday 12 February 2017 13:44:02 Sven Hartge wrote: > >> I think the main point is being missed. > > > > Yes, by you. You asked whether Adobe Acrobat, which is a proprietary > > program belonging to Adobe, would run on Debian. Sven said no. > > No, the question was, if it is available "with Debian", not if it would > run "on Debian". And the answer is "no", it is and was never available > with (or from) Debian. I was careless with my prepositions. Sorry. Though the answer remains effectively the same in this case!! I think the OP actually meant "on" (I don't think he cared who supplied it!), and didn't read carefully enough. Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Slight correction was Re: Before I install Debian |
| Message-ID | <ta9IS-2Tv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #177756 |
On Sunday 12 February 2017 20:40:40 Lisi Reisz wrote: > and didn't read carefully enough. and *** I *** didn't read carefully enough. (As it stands it is open to being misread.) Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web