Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #175298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-01 12:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-01 13:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
deborphan Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:30 +0100
Re: deborphan Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:10 +0100
Re: deborphan <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-01 13:30 +0100
Re: deborphan Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-12-01 13:40 +0100
Re: deborphan Peter Ludikovsky <peter@ludikovsky.name> - 2016-12-01 13:10 +0100
| From | Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 12:30 +0100 |
| Subject | deborphan |
| Message-ID | <sJxIR-3bK-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install <package>', and along with it a certain number of other packages were installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge <package>' followed by `deborphan' but in the output of `deborphan' none of those packages that were installed along with <package> was present. Is that normal? Thanks for any help, Rodolfo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJylz-3Eb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #175298 |
Peter Ludikovsky <peter@ludikovsky.name> writes: > What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that > aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the > only one with dependencies. > > Regards. > /peter aptitude said it was just removing <package>, not those packages that were installed along with <package>. Rodolfo > > On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install >> <package>', and along with it a certain number of other packages were >> installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge <package>' followed by `deborphan' >> but in the output of `deborphan' none of those packages that were installed >> along with <package> was present. Is that normal? >> >> Thanks for any help, >> >> Rodolfo >>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJyEW-3Or-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #175301 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +0000, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Peter Ludikovsky <peter@ludikovsky.name> writes:
>
> > What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
> > aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
> > only one with dependencies.
> >
> > Regards.
> > /peter
>
> aptitude said it was just removing <package>, not those packages that were
> installed along with <package>.
By default it does remove automatically installed packages (but not their
configurations), see the manual page and [1]. So it's quite possible that
it did just that on your system.
Next time you do an experiment like that, make sure to set up a suitable
control group[2] :-)
[1] http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s02s06.html
[2] e.g. by doing a dpkg --get-selections > before and another
> after and diffing the sorted results, or similar.
Regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlhAFaMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaDQgCfaOptjSHslFhKFTxYe9FpL5da
o9UAn1QY2dXL1c1oGm9SUOmL9IqdHdH3
=TWpu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJyOC-3S3-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #175303 |
> By default it does remove automatically installed packages (but not their > configurations), see the manual page and [1]. So it's quite possible that > it did just that on your system. > > Next time you do an experiment like that, make sure to set up a suitable > control group[2] :-) > > [1] http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s02s06.html > [2] e.g. by doing a dpkg --get-selections > before and another > > > after and diffing the sorted results, or similar. > > Regards > -- t Configurations can be purges with aptitude purge ~c Hans
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Ludikovsky <peter@ludikovsky.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJylz-3Eb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #175298 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the only one with dependencies. Regards. /peter On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install > <package>', and along with it a certain number of other packages were > installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge <package>' followed by `deborphan' but > in the output of `deborphan' none of those packages that were installed along > with <package> was present. Is that normal? > > Thanks for any help, > > Rodolfo >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web