Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #174178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-04 20:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-11 09:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 29 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-04 20:30 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-04 21:10 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-06 17:50 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-06 19:10 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 00:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-10 12:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-10 12:30 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-10 14:50 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-10 15:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-10 15:30 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-10 15:50 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 16:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-10 16:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-10 16:50 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 18:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 00:10 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 00:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 03:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-11-11 11:10 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 12:50 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-11-11 19:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-11-12 11:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-11-12 12:20 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 14:30 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-10 21:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 00:10 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-11 05:00 +0100
Re: Problem attempting to use xorriso Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 09:10 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCoAG-7P3-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174492 |
On Friday 11 November 2016 05:07:42 Curt wrote: > On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote: > > It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely > > older than Linus Torvalds father ;) > > Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or the pissing > equivalent of a senile contest? And at 82, I suspect I am the older, but with a psa in the 10+ range, I don't enter any pissing contests. :( How the heck did this thread degenerate to this? Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-12 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCDzH-GU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174507 |
On 2016-11-11, Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2016 05:07:42 Curt wrote: > >> On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote: >> > It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely >> > older than Linus Torvalds father ;) >> >> Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or the pissing >> equivalent of a senile contest? > > And at 82, I suspect I am the older, but with a psa in the 10+ range, I > don't enter any pissing contests. :( Well, I think the general rule is there's always somebody older than you no matter how old you are, unless you find yourself in the exceptional case of being the oldest in the whole wide world (a fate I would wish upon you, except that I've remarked that those in the running pushing 120 years, wheel-chair ridden and pretty much deaf, blind and toothless, seem to be enjoying a fate I wouldn't wish on anyone). > How the heck did this thread degenerate to this? I degenerated it, I'm afraid. > Cheers, Gene Heskett -- “It is enough that the arrows fit exactly in the wounds that they have made.” Franz Kafka
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCEcu-VK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174578 |
Hi, [pissing contest and associated difficulties] Gene Heskett wrote: > > How the heck did this thread degenerate to this? Curt wrote: > I degenerated it, I'm afraid. An uprise of the progressive youth against us old farts ? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/53/ca/af/53caafee1d123414aa9d431aab2ca414.jpg Maybe one should install a warning sign at the archive to tell future readers that there is nearly no info about xorriso in this thread. Have a nice day :) Thomas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-12 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCEvL-1iJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174580 |
On Saturday 12 November 2016 05:50:42 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > [pissing contest and associated difficulties] > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > > How the heck did this thread degenerate to this? > > Curt wrote: > > I degenerated it, I'm afraid. > > An uprise of the progressive youth against us old farts ? Probably. Now where did I put my LART. :) > https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/53/ca/af/53caafee1d123414aa9 >d431aab2ca414.jpg > > > Maybe one should install a warning sign at the archive to tell > future readers that there is nearly no info about xorriso in this > thread. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-12 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCGxz-2zK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174580 |
On Saturday 12 November 2016 10:50:42 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Maybe one should install a warning sign at the archive to tell > future readers that there is nearly no info about xorriso in this > thread. 17 about xorriso and permissions (presenting problem often not the real problem, and that may apply also to archive searchers) 6 definitely entirely OT and/or unsuitable for sensitive ears. Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sC3FT-2i0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174456 |
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days.
> I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and
> permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding games
> with /etc/fstab .
>
> richard@jessie-defaults:~$
> richard@jessie-defaults:~$ ls -l /dev/sd*
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda
> brw-rw---- 1 root owl 8, 1 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda1
> brw-rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 2 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda2
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 3 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda3
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda5
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb
> br--rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 17 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb1
↑ is there a purpose behind the missing w ?
Cheers,
David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sC6DM-4xR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174484 |
On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > >> Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days. >> I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and >> permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding games >> with /etc/fstab . >> >> richard@jessie-defaults:~$ >> richard@jessie-defaults:~$ ls -l /dev/sd* >> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda >> brw-rw---- 1 root owl 8, 1 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda1 >> brw-rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 2 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda2 >> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 3 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda3 >> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda5 >> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb >> br--rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 17 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb1 > > ↑ is there a purpose behind the missing w ? > > Cheers, > David. Yes. My rational is in my rather verbose post https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00361.html . Linux evidently does not do things "my way" [apologies to a fast food chain].
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 05:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCbap-7qk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174488 |
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 17:05:06 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote: > >On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > > > >>Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days. > >>I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and > >>permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding games > >>with /etc/fstab . > >> > >>richard@jessie-defaults:~$ > >>richard@jessie-defaults:~$ ls -l /dev/sd* > >>brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda > >>brw-rw---- 1 root owl 8, 1 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda1 > >>brw-rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 2 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda2 > >>brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 3 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda3 > >>brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda5 > >>brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb > >>br--rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 17 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb1 > > > > ↑ is there a purpose behind the missing w ? > > Yes. My rational is in my rather verbose post > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00361.html . > Linux evidently does not do things "my way" [apologies to a fast > food chain]. Should I take it that last sentence means you are aware root can write over a file even if the permission is --------- , let alone r-------- , so you have no precaution as well as no protection. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCf4l-1Jj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #174490 |
On 11/10/2016 9:49 PM, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 17:05:06 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: >> On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote: >>> On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days. >>>> I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and >>>> permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding games >>>> with /etc/fstab . >>>> >>>> richard@jessie-defaults:~$ >>>> richard@jessie-defaults:~$ ls -l /dev/sd* >>>> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda >>>> brw-rw---- 1 root owl 8, 1 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda1 >>>> brw-rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 2 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda2 >>>> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 3 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda3 >>>> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 10 03:35 /dev/sda5 >>>> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb >>>> br--rw-r-- 1 root owl 8, 17 Nov 10 04:43 /dev/sdb1 >>> >>> ↑ is there a purpose behind the missing w ? >> >> Yes. My rational is in my rather verbose post >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00361.html . >> Linux evidently does not do things "my way" [apologies to a fast >> food chain]. > > Should I take it that last sentence means you are aware root can write > over a file even if the permission is --------- , let alone r-------- , > so you have no precaution as well as no protection. > > Cheers, > David. > > It was a description of what I wanted, not what I could get. I suspect thinking in detail about "corner cases" is a good education.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web