Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165531 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-29 16:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
weak repository key Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100
Re: weak repository key Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100
Re: weak repository key Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-03-17 18:20 +0100
Re: Re: weak repository key Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de> - 2016-03-28 21:20 +0200
Re: weak repository key Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-03-28 21:50 +0200
Re: weak repository key The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-29 16:00 +0200
| From | Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | weak repository key |
| Message-ID | <rdIv8-Qo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
After updating to apt version 1.2.7 I get a warning on apt-get update: W: gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg: The repository is insufficiently signed by key 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 (weak digest) and the repository is ignored Is there a way that apt re-trust the old SHA1 key, or do we have to report this to Google and all other repos? Floris
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdIv8-Qo-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #165531 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Floris:
> After updating to apt version 1.2.7 I get a warning on apt-get update:
> W: gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg:
> The repository is insufficiently signed by key
> 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 (weak digest)
>
> and the repository is ignored
>
> Is there a way that apt re-trust the old SHA1 key, or do we have to report
> this to Google and all other repos?
Report it:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg00006.html
J.
--
My drug of choice is self-pity.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://archive.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdJKy-1PB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #165532 |
Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> wrote: > Floris: >> After updating to apt version 1.2.7 I get a warning on apt-get update: >> W: gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg: >> The repository is insufficiently signed by key >> 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 (weak digest) >> >> and the repository is ignored >> >> Is there a way that apt re-trust the old SHA1 key, or do we have to report >> this to Google and all other repos? > Report it: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg00006.html According to https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=594414 this should be fixed with the next repository update. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rhKRI-2Yl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #165551 |
I still have the problem. Someone else too?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rhLkK-3al-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #166040 |
Daniel Schröter <d.schroeter@gmx.de> wrote: > I still have the problem. Someone else too? Well, Google has not fixed this, so of course you still have the problem. But there is _nothing_ Debian can do here. The bug is at <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=596074> and has not seen much action. But since Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 will release with an apt version also showing this warning, I guess this will get a lot more traction as soon as Xenial is released because a lot more "normal" people will then get the warning and not just people running Debian Testing/Unstable or Beta-Versions of Ubuntu. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ri2lB-72M-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #166040 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2016-03-28 at 15:15, Daniel Schröter wrote: > I still have the problem. Someone else too? The list of repositories which are known to have this problem is available here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Sha1Removal The only way for the problem to be fixed, short of reverting the software feature change which introduced it (which would reintroduce security weaknesses), is for the people who run those repositories to re-sign their files as described on that page. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web