Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #165229 > unrolled thread

Re: Installing topmenu in stable

Started bySven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se>
First post2016-03-11 12:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Installing topmenu in stable Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2016-03-11 12:50 +0100
    Re: Installing topmenu in stable Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
      Re: Installing topmenu in stable Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
        Re: Installing topmenu in stable Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-11 14:00 +0100
          Re: Installing topmenu in stable Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-11 14:30 +0100
          Re: Installing topmenu in stable Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2016-03-11 15:20 +0100
    Re: Installing topmenu in stable Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-11 13:00 +0100

#165229 — Re: Installing topmenu in stable

FromSven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se>
Date2016-03-11 12:50 +0100
SubjectRe: Installing topmenu in stable
Message-ID<rbtJU-5CI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:40 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> I'm thinking the most Debian-friendly options are either to compile
> them myself from git, or to upgrade to stretch, which I don't really
> want to do.

I'd say the most Debian friendly way would be to grab the source
package from sid and recompile it for stable (if at all possible).

-- 
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 6FAB5CD5



[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#165231

FromAdam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net>
Date2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
Message-ID<rbtTA-5I7-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165229
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:41:16 +0100 Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:40 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > I'm thinking the most Debian-friendly options are either to compile
> > them myself from git, or to upgrade to stretch, which I don't really
> > want to do.
> 
> I'd say the most Debian friendly way would be to grab the source
> package from sid and recompile it for stable (if at all possible).

I shall give it a go. Sid, not stretch? Pour quoi?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#165234

FromSven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se>
Date2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
Message-ID<rbtTB-5I7-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165231

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:49 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> I shall give it a go. Sid, not stretch? Pour quoi?

Testing might be a closer match in general, but in this case the
versions doesn't seem to differ much.

-- 
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 6FAB5CD5



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#165238

FromAdam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net>
Date2016-03-11 14:00 +0100
Message-ID<rbuPD-6r7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165234
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:54:21 +0100 Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:49 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > I shall give it a go. Sid, not stretch? Pour quoi?
> 
> Testing might be a closer match in general, but in this case the
> versions doesn't seem to differ much.

Houston, we have a problem. Stable does not have a high enough version
of lxpanel (>= 0.8), so the build has unmet dependencies. What now?
Get the source package for that from testing/sid too?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#165240

FromDan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Date2016-03-11 14:30 +0100
Message-ID<rbviG-6Sm-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165238
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:53:54PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:54:21 +0100 Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:49 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > I shall give it a go. Sid, not stretch? Pour quoi?
> > 
> > Testing might be a closer match in general, but in this case the
> > versions doesn't seem to differ much.
> 
> Houston, we have a problem. Stable does not have a high enough version
> of lxpanel (>= 0.8), so the build has unmet dependencies. What now?
> Get the source package for that from testing/sid too?

Yup. If it were easy and simple, it would probably already be in
backports.

Hopefully you won't need to chase too many layers of
dependencies.

-dsr-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#165241

FromSven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se>
Date2016-03-11 15:20 +0100
Message-ID<rbw54-7pJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165238
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 15:53 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Houston, we have a problem. Stable does not have a high enough
> version
> of lxpanel (>= 0.8), so the build has unmet dependencies. What now?
> Get the source package for that from testing/sid too?

I'm guessing that you could disable the lxpanel plugin and simply not
build it.

But I have no idea how hard it would be to make the necessary changes
to the packaging scripts.

-- 
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 6FAB5CD5

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#165233

FromAdam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net>
Date2016-03-11 13:00 +0100
Message-ID<rbtTA-5I7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#165229
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:41:16 +0100 Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:40 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > I'm thinking the most Debian-friendly options are either to compile
> > them myself from git, or to upgrade to stretch, which I don't really
> > want to do.
> 
> I'd say the most Debian friendly way would be to grab the source
> package from sid and recompile it for stable (if at all possible).

Nevermind. They're identical.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web