Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #169764 > unrolled thread

Request for feedback: systemd backport for jessie

Started byMichael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
First post2016-07-05 18:00 +0200
Last post2016-07-05 21:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  Request for feedback: systemd backport for jessie Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> - 2016-07-05 18:00 +0200
    Re: Request for feedback: systemd backport for jessie Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de> - 2016-07-05 21:10 +0200
      Re: Request for feedback: systemd backport for jessie Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-07-05 21:40 +0200

#169764 — Request for feedback: systemd backport for jessie

FromMichael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
Date2016-07-05 18:00 +0200
SubjectRequest for feedback: systemd backport for jessie
Message-ID<rRAVs-4Ms-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.

If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
that systemd received since its version 215-17+deb8u4 (the one
available from jessie) you might wanna give it a try.

The backport is based on what will be released as v230-6 for Debian
unstable soonish. Once systemd v230-6 migrated to testing and if I
receive enough feedback I'll upload systemd v230-6 officially
towards jessie-backports then.

In the meanwhile packages (source + binaries for amd64) and usage
instructions are available at:

  https://people.debian.org/~mika/systemd/jessie/

I'd appreciate any testing and feedback.

Special thanks to Michael Biebl for assistance and feedback with the
backport.

regards,
-mika-
-- 
http://michael-prokop.at/  || http://adminzen.org/
http://grml-solutions.com/ || http://grml.org/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#169770

FromElimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>
Date2016-07-05 21:10 +0200
Message-ID<rRDTk-6V0-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#169764
Hi Mika,

* Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> [2016-07-05 17:34 +0200]:

> Hi,
> 
> here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
> 
> If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
> that systemd received since its version 215-17+deb8u4 (the one
> available from jessie) you might wanna give it a try.
> 
> The backport is based on what will be released as v230-6 for Debian
> unstable soonish. Once systemd v230-6 migrated to testing and if I
> receive enough feedback I'll upload systemd v230-6 officially
> towards jessie-backports then.

Are you aware of the 'Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release'
thread at debian-devel [0]?

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00054.html

Elimar
-- 
  From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
  .
  arsehole \arse"hole`\ ([aum]rs"h[=o]l`), n.
         1. execretory opening at the end of the alimentary canal.
            -- randomly choosed!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169771

FromBrian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Date2016-07-05 21:40 +0200
Message-ID<rREmm-77d-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#169770
On Tue 05 Jul 2016 at 20:46:07 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:

> Hi Mika,
> 
> * Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> [2016-07-05 17:34 +0200]:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
> > 
> > If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
> > that systemd received since its version 215-17+deb8u4 (the one
> > available from jessie) you might wanna give it a try.
> > 
> > The backport is based on what will be released as v230-6 for Debian
> > unstable soonish. Once systemd v230-6 migrated to testing and if I
> > receive enough feedback I'll upload systemd v230-6 officially
> > towards jessie-backports then.
> 
> Are you aware of the 'Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release'
> thread at debian-devel [0]?
> 
> [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00054.html

I am aware of it. What bearing has it on working on providing a backport
of systemd for jessie (which I would agree with)? Improving the systemd
experience on Jessie can only be for the good of its users.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web