Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #168124 > unrolled thread

Squid security

Started byRob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
First post2016-05-21 12:20 +0200
Last post2016-06-04 17:10 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  Squid security Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2016-05-21 12:20 +0200
    Re: Squid security "heqamilus@runbox.com" <heqamilus@runbox.com> - 2016-05-21 12:40 +0200
      Re: Squid security Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2016-05-21 15:20 +0200
        Re: Squid security Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2016-05-22 13:40 +0200
          Re: Squid security Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2016-06-04 17:10 +0200

#168124 — Squid security

FromRob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
Date2016-05-21 12:20 +0200
SubjectSquid security
Message-ID<rBcaJ-2h8-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi there


This puzzles me a bit: Information on source package squid3;
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/squid3

Do I need a to build a backport to be safe?


Regards,
Rob

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#168125

From"heqamilus@runbox.com" <heqamilus@runbox.com>
Date2016-05-21 12:40 +0200
Message-ID<rBcu5-2nb-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#168124
No need to build a backport. Just use the sid/unstable testing version
on apt-get


H.


On 05/21/2016 12:12 PM, Rob van der Putten wrote:
> Hi there
> 
> 
> This puzzles me a bit: Information on source package squid3;
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/squid3
> 
> Do I need a to build a backport to be safe?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#168127

FromRob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
Date2016-05-21 15:20 +0200
Message-ID<rBeYW-3Xz-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#168125
Hi there


heqamilus@runbox.com wrote:

> No need to build a backport. Just use the sid/unstable testing version
> on apt-get

I didn't check the library compatibility. Thanks.
It's a bit odd though. Every version patched except stable.


Regards,
Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#168150

FromRob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
Date2016-05-22 13:40 +0200
Message-ID<rBzTH-dM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#168127
Hi there


Rob van der Putten wrote:

> heqamilus@runbox.com wrote:
>
>> No need to build a backport. Just use the sid/unstable testing version
>> on apt-get
>
> I didn't check the library compatibility. Thanks.

The libs are different.

> It's a bit odd though. Every version patched except stable.


Regards,
Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#168532

FromRob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
Date2016-06-04 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<rGln4-2Il-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#168150
Hi there


Rob van der Putten wrote:

<Cut>

> The libs are different.

So I build a backport.
And a libecap3 backport. It wants libecap3.

<Cut>


Regards,
Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web