Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #162525 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-03 16:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 40 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 16:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 16:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 16:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 17:00 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 18:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 18:00 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-01-03 19:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 22:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 18:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 18:40 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 19:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-01-03 21:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 22:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-01-03 22:40 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 00:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-04 01:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-04 03:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-01-04 04:00 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-04 04:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-01-05 02:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2016-01-04 15:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 22:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 22:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 22:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-03 23:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-01-04 18:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 18:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 21:40 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2016-01-03 23:00 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 00:40 +0100
Re: vivaldi? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-04 01:10 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 01:20 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-04 02:30 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2016-01-04 20:40 +0100
Re: vivaldi? Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2016-01-04 14:50 +0100
Re: vivaldi? James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> - 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 04:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qN4jD-6cY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162568 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 21:56:46 David Christensen wrote: > On 01/03/2016 02:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Well, slashdot can crash chrome just sitting there on the front > > page, presumably when an attempt is made to load some off-my-screen > > bit of slashdot. > > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/news/armed-militia-takeover-oregon-debate-mea > >ning-of-terrorist/ > > Testing IceWeasel 38.5.0 on a fresh install of > debian-7.9.0-amd64-xfce, I see a web page with lots of text and > images. I do not see any error messages. > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-marshal-south-dakota-shoots-kills-sou > >th-carolina-murder-suspect/ > > I see a pop-up/ overlay for ~10 seconds, then I see the web page. > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-quiet-power-of-meditation/ > > I see the web page. > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/news/activists-target-gun-makers-with-unload- > >your-401k/ > > I see the web page. > > > Thats 4 that give this: > > Error 413 Request Entity Too Large, purported from the varnish cache > > server, whatever the heck that is. > > Did you click on something to produce that error message? > Yes, the listed links. > > http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/isis-to-activate-thousands-of-slee > >per-cells-in-2016-to-destabilize-the-west/ > > I see the web page. > > > There I found a flash, tried to play it, > > Following the paragraph "Baghdadi added: ...", I see a grayed area > with the text "A plugin is needed to display this content". Clicking > on it has no effect. > > > If I browse to YouTube, and click on the top video "Coldplay - Birds > (Official video)", it plays. Testing two others, they work fine. > Note that I did not need to install browser-plugin-gnash, so YouTube > is likely detecting what IceWeasel supports OOTB and sending a > suitable video stream. > > > clicked on the update now > > button. it went thru the download of a 32 bit version in a tar.gz, > > supposedly saving it in ~/Downloads. This is the only flash file in > > Downloads: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 gene gene 5979889 Aug 25 2013 > > flashplayer_11_sa.i386.tar.gz > > I have unpacked it and installed it several times, no effect. > > I think you've boogered your machine. Put in another system drive (or > USB stick), do a plain vanilla install of Wheezy with Xfce, take an > image, and then try IceWeasel. > > > David Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-05 02:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNos1-34q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162569 |
On 01/03/2016 07:44 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 03 January 2016 21:56:46 David Christensen wrote: >> Did you click on something to produce that error message? >> > Yes, the listed links. Then your IceWeasel and/or Wheezy are broken. I would do a backup, wipe, fresh install (or re-image), and restore cycle. David
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNe9l-4xG-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162568 |
David Christensen: > Gene Heskett: > > http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/isis-to-activate-thousands-of-sleeper-cells-in-2016-to-destabilize-the-west/ > > I see the web page. > > > There I found a flash, tried to play it, > > Following the paragraph "Baghdadi added: ...", I see a grayed area > with the text "A plugin is needed to display this content". Clicking > on it has no effect. I'd suggest not to install flashplugin-nonfree, but browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash instead. It makes the Pepper Flash plugin from Chrome available for NPAPI web browsers such as Iceweasel and Seamonkey, using the latest Flash version, which is 20.0.0.228 at the moment. This way, the video mentioned above plays fine here in Iceweasel, Seamonkey, Opera and Vivaldi. As for YouTube, in www.youtube.com/html5 you can set YouTube to use html5 wherever possible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r01xE-2sd-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162580 |
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:09:53PM +0100, Siard wrote: > David Christensen: > > Gene Heskett: > > > http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/isis-to-activate-thousands-of-sleeper-cells-in-2016-to-destabilize-the-west/ > > > > I see the web page. > > > > > There I found a flash, tried to play it, > > > > Following the paragraph "Baghdadi added: ...", I see a grayed area > > with the text "A plugin is needed to display this content". Clicking > > on it has no effect. > > I'd suggest not to install flashplugin-nonfree, but > browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash instead. > It makes the Pepper Flash plugin from Chrome available for NPAPI web > browsers such as Iceweasel and Seamonkey, using the latest Flash > version, which is 20.0.0.228 at the moment. Which, at a guess, means it comes from Google. If true, ain't no way that goes on my system! If I'm wrong, please educate me. -- Bob Holtzman A man is a man who will fight with a sword or conquer Mt. Everest in snow. But the bravest of all owns a '34 Ford and tries for six thousand in low.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMY4x-2ea-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162525 |
Hi Gene, all, I think Gene should be handled with respect and patience > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle > the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. The popup you see is because your flashplayer (plugin) is outdated. Whenever you update it, the pop up goes away until the next update is released. This happens for good or bad very often recently - 3-4 times a year. But the installation of the flash plugin is not that complicated. At least you know how one works with a console (there is install script you run via sudo) The other thing I'm doing is using the latest version of firefox and not icew. But this comes to personal preference. I do not like chrome, though it is not bad. I do not like it because it comes from google. regards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMYHf-2vF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162548 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 16:08:07 deloptes wrote: > Hi Gene, all, > I think Gene should be handled with respect and patience > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't > > hassle the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years > > ago. > > The popup you see is because your flashplayer (plugin) is outdated. > Whenever you update it, the pop up goes away until the next update is > released. This happens for good or bad very often recently - 3-4 times > a year. > Yes, I have seen that requester many many times, but when I go to the adobe site like the suggested link goes to, the only version it offers me is exactly what I've had for ay least 2 years, the last one afer which they stated that no new linux compatibles would be released, that was the last one. Can you explain that? As a FWIW I have these installed: (hand copied from the synaptic screen, and these archives are not present in /var/cache/apt/archives. Accuracy of hand copying dubious) flash-plugin-nonfree 1.3.2+wheezy1 pepperflash-plugin-nonfree 1.4~bpo60+1 browser-plugin-lightspark 0.6.0.1-2 browser-plugin-gnash 0.8.11~git20120629-1+deb7u1 konqueror-plugin-gnash same version as above All the usual lightspark suspects are installed, as are all the usual suspects for gnash. I have put up with this slow destruction of what iceweasel can do, dating back to other installs as long as 2 years back. No one else seems to be having problems with it they can't fix. Whats next? Nuke em all & see if iceweasel can fix it when its all missing? > But the installation of the flash plugin is not that complicated. At > least you know how one works with a console (there is install script > you run via sudo) > > The other thing I'm doing is using the latest version of firefox and > not icew. But this comes to personal preference. > I do not like chrome, though it is not bad. I do not like it because > it comes from google. > > regards Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMZ0C-2VH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162554 |
Gene writes: > Yes, I have seen that requester many many times, but when I go to the > adobe site like the suggested link goes to, the only version it offers > me is exactly what I've had for ay least 2 years, the last one afer > which they stated that no new linux compatibles would be released, that > was the last one. > Can you explain that? You should know better than to do what Adobe tells you (the alert is coming from the Adobe server software at the site you are accessing. It has nothing to do with Firefox). Get rid of anything you got directly from Adobe. Install the flashplugin-nonfree package. When you get that "alert" run "update-flashplugin-nonfree --install". Adobe is not releasing new versions for Linux but they are patching security bugs. Better yet, get rid of Adobe and install Gnash. BTW there is a Firefox plugin that will make Youtube use HTML5 instead of Flash. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNgNS-6jM-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162556 |
On 2016-01-03, John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> wrote: > > BTW there is a Firefox plugin that will make Youtube use HTML5 instead > of Flash. I use the latest version of Firefox; Youtube defaults to HTML5 for the most part, but I get no sound. I've gleaned, perhaps incorrectly, that it may have to do with the fact that my HDMI "watchamacallit" is card 0 and my ALC662 "chip" (that I use for sound) is card 1. I created an .asoundrc workaround file in my home directory many moons ago to get sound because of the above arrangement. Well, anyway, I've hijacked the thread and will be shot at dawn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNh7b-6vZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162591 |
On Monday 04 January 2016 17:06:44 Curt wrote: > On 2016-01-03, John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> wrote: > > BTW there is a Firefox plugin that will make Youtube use HTML5 instead > > of Flash. > > I use the latest version of Firefox; Youtube defaults to HTML5 for the > most part, but I get no sound. > > I've gleaned, perhaps incorrectly, that it may have to do with the fact > that my HDMI "watchamacallit" is card 0 and my ALC662 "chip" (that I use > for sound) is card 1. > > I created an .asoundrc workaround file in my home directory many moons > ago to get sound because of the above arrangement. > > Well, anyway, I've hijacked the thread and will be shot at dawn. And you didn't even say "was". Shooting is too good. ;-) Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r00Lg-1TO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162548 |
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:08:07PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > Hi Gene, all, > I think Gene should be handled with respect and patience > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle > > the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. > > The popup you see is because your flashplayer (plugin) is outdated. Whenever > you update it, the pop up goes away until the next update is released. This > happens for good or bad very often recently - 3-4 times a year. > > But the installation of the flash plugin is not that complicated. At least > you know how one works with a console (there is install script you run via > sudo) > > The other thing I'm doing is using the latest version of firefox and not > icew. But this comes to personal preference. > I do not like chrome, though it is not bad. I do not like it because it > comes from google. That's not the only reason to dislike it. I found it impossible to lock it down like I can with iceweasel/fireffox -- Bob Holtzman A man is a man who will fight with a sword or conquer Mt. Everest in snow. But the bravest of all owns a '34 Ford and tries for six thousand in low.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMYQW-2Ao-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162525 |
Gene Heskett composed on 2016-01-03 10:02 (UTC-0500): > Trying to find a web browser that actually works here. With so many giving trouble, have you considered creating a new login user to test with? I find it hard to believe you can find no browser capable of using the web, or every browser crashing. I've found found none incapable for many many moons. Maybe you have a filesystem problem that's affecting HTTP connections. Maybe a forced / filesystem check would find and fix a problem. I do not have Flash installed on this system, and have no problem doing what needs doing among 5-6 different Gecko and KHTML web browsers, e.g. on cbsnews: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/ff38esrFS1920x1200x120.jpg -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMZai-31c-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162555 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 16:54:28 Felix Miata wrote: > Gene Heskett composed on 2016-01-03 10:02 (UTC-0500): > > Trying to find a web browser that actually works here. > > With so many giving trouble, have you considered creating a new login > user to test with? I find it hard to believe you can find no browser > capable of using the web, or every browser crashing. I've found found > none incapable for many many moons. > > Maybe you have a filesystem problem that's affecting HTTP connections. > Maybe a forced / filesystem check would find and fix a problem. > > I do not have Flash installed on this system, and have no problem > doing what needs doing among 5-6 different Gecko and KHTML web > browsers, e.g. on cbsnews: > http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/ff38esrFS1920x1200x120.jpg I have no problems with .jpg, they just work. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMZDk-3bg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162525 |
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 03 January 2016 15:02:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > > So I installed googles chromium, > > Which? Google Chrome or chromium (debian package). > > > but it crashes and you have to use the > > reload button, hundreds of times a day. > > > Does anyone have a clue what that is all about? googles idea of an > > easter egg that disappears if you register chromium which I assume turns > > it into chrome? > > No, they are not the same thing. There is chromium, which is a Debian > package and Open Source, and Google Chrome, which is proprietary and Just > Works (most of the time). > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle > > the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. > > I find that Flash on Iceweasel and Google Chrome both work on Wheezy for > almost everything. I don't use Iceweasel a lot because of all the security > issues. What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 00:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qN0pH-3Je-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162559 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 22:43:36 Bob Holtzman wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Sunday 03 January 2016 15:02:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > So I installed googles chromium, > > > > Which? Google Chrome or chromium (debian package). > > > > > but it crashes and you have to use the > > > reload button, hundreds of times a day. > > > > > > Does anyone have a clue what that is all about? googles idea of an > > > easter egg that disappears if you register chromium which I assume > > > turns it into chrome? > > > > No, they are not the same thing. There is chromium, which is a Debian > > package and Open Source, and Google Chrome, which is proprietary and Just > > Works (most of the time). > > > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle > > > the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. > > > > I find that Flash on Iceweasel and Google Chrome both work on Wheezy for > > almost everything. I don't use Iceweasel a lot because of all the > > security issues. > > What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security > problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please. e.g. https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151216182759.GA3513@pisco.westfalen.local Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qN0SL-48F-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162562 |
Bob writes: > What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security > problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please. Lisi writes: > e.g. > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151216182759.GA3513@pisco.westfalen.local So what? Those are Firefox bugs. They were fixed. "sudo apt install iceweasel" and Bob's your uncle. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-05 01:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNnvY-2lN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162564 |
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:06 AM, John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> wrote: > Bob writes: >> What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security >> problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please. > > Lisi writes: >> e.g. >> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151216182759.GA3513@pisco.westfalen.local > > So what? Those are Firefox bugs. They were fixed. "sudo apt install iceweasel" or apt-get update > and Bob's your uncle. As John implies here, every web browser has these kinds of bugs show up reguarly. It's a symptom of the features wars that the big companies wage to try to control the market, and, since we want to use the web with everyone else, we get dragged into the wake whether we wanted to ski or not. Firefox has does not have especially more than anyone else. -- Joel Rees Ranting is free. http://free-is-not-free.blogspot.jp/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 02:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qN28b-4OO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162562 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 18:33:05 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 03 January 2016 22:43:36 Bob Holtzman wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Sunday 03 January 2016 15:02:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > So I installed googles chromium, > > > > > > Which? Google Chrome or chromium (debian package). > > > > > > > but it crashes and you have to use the > > > > reload button, hundreds of times a day. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have a clue what that is all about? googles idea of > > > > an easter egg that disappears if you register chromium which I > > > > assume turns it into chrome? > > > > > > No, they are not the same thing. There is chromium, which is a > > > Debian package and Open Source, and Google Chrome, which is > > > proprietary and Just Works (most of the time). > > > > > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't > > > > hassle the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 > > > > years ago. > > > > > > I find that Flash on Iceweasel and Google Chrome both work on > > > Wheezy for almost everything. I don't use Iceweasel a lot because > > > of all the security issues. > > > > What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security > > problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please. > > e.g. > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151216182759.GA3513@pisco.west >falen.local > > Lisi Which is the version I have installed. Thanks. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNj8Z-7LW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162559 |
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:33:05PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 03 January 2016 22:43:36 Bob Holtzman wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Sunday 03 January 2016 15:02:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > So I installed googles chromium, > > > > > > Which? Google Chrome or chromium (debian package). > > > > > > > but it crashes and you have to use the > > > > reload button, hundreds of times a day. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have a clue what that is all about? googles idea of an > > > > easter egg that disappears if you register chromium which I assume > > > > turns it into chrome? > > > > > > No, they are not the same thing. There is chromium, which is a Debian > > > package and Open Source, and Google Chrome, which is proprietary and Just > > > Works (most of the time). > > > > > > > Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle > > > > the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. > > > > > > I find that Flash on Iceweasel and Google Chrome both work on Wheezy for > > > almost everything. I don't use Iceweasel a lot because of all the > > > security issues. > > > > What is your substitute? Also I haven't heard of a lot of security > > problems w/ iceweasel. Enlighten me please. > > e.g. > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151216182759.GA3513@pisco.westfalen.local I'm getting "no such message", "Sorry, no match found for message-id 20151216182759.GA3513" or "No such Message-ID known". Found a post in the debian-security-announce news group about the vulnerabilities but it said that they had been patched. They are a use-after-free and a flaw in the handling of add-ons installation. Are these the ones you refer to? If not, got another link?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNdGi-48u-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162525 |
Op Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:02:59 +0100 schreef Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>: > Greetings all; > > > So I downloaded the vivaldi-beta deb, and tried to use apt-get to > install, but that spit out several dozen pages of E: lines and didn't. > vivaldi-beta is an older version use the snapshot version. Vivaldi is still alpha/beta software so the beta version isn't more stable than the snapshot. You don't install deb packages with apt. Use dpkg -i vivaldi-some-version.deb apt-get install -f vivaldi creates an entry in /etc/apt/sources.d/ to make it easy to update with apt-get > So I stepped into the deb with mc, and copied its contents to the > directories it would have been put in, even ran the postinst thing. > Didn't run from a cli. So now you are sure your installation is broken. At you own risk! Try to remove those files. success, btw. Vivaldi runs fine over here floris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSm6d-3ZZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #162525 |
>>>>> "GH" == Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> writes: GH> So I downloaded the vivaldi-beta deb, and tried to use apt-get to GH> install, but that spit out several dozen pages of E: lines and didn't. To install a downloaded deb, try: dpkg --install file.deb GH> Comments please, and what browser are you all using that doesn't hassle GH> the user to death, it Just Works, like firefox did 3 years ago. You can always install firefox (or seamonkey) from the upstream tar: http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.39/linux-i686/en-US/seamonkey-2.39.tar.bz2 http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.39/contrib/seamonkey-2.39.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 https://download-installer.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/43.0.4/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-43.0.4.tar.bz2 https://download-installer.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/43.0.4/linux-x86_64/en-US/firefox-43.0.4.tar.bz2 (Seamonkey is the continuation of the original mozilla UI.) -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web