Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #158350 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-27 21:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-28 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 12 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
No systemd after update wheezy -> jessie? Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> - 2015-09-27 21:20 +0200
Re: No systemd after update wheezy -> jessie? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-28 00:20 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-09-28 11:20 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-28 11:40 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-09-28 13:50 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2015-09-28 18:10 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 18:40 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2015-09-28 19:40 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 20:20 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> - 2015-09-28 18:50 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> - 2015-09-28 18:10 +0200
Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 18:20 +0200
| From | Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | No systemd after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdpEm-7Qf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello,
after the update from wheezy to jessie, there is no systemd running on my
machine. I had the impression, that systemd is installed automatically...?
% dpkg -l \*systemd\* | egrep \^ii
ii libsystemd0:amd64 215-17+deb8u2 amd64 systemd utility library
% ps ax | grep system
3441 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system
16669 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto system
% ps ax | head -n 2
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ? Ss 0:02 init [2]
% dpkg -S /sbin/init
sysvinit-core: /sbin/init
I have to add that the machine is a vserver where I have influence on the
kernel
% cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/xvda1
ip=95.129.55.223:127.0.255.255:95.129.55.193:255.255.255.192:vsrv28769.customer.xenway.de:eth0:off
--
Markus Grunwald
https://www.the-grue.de
Fragen zur Mail? https://www.the-grue.de/mail_und_co
https://www.the-grue.de/~markus/markus_grunwald.gpg
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qdssy-3tp-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158350 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:00:09 +0200 Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> wrote: > Hello, > > after the update from wheezy to jessie, there is no systemd running > on my machine. I had the impression, that systemd is installed > automatically...? > > % dpkg -l \*systemd\* | egrep \^ii > ii libsystemd0:amd64 215-17+deb8u2 amd64 systemd > utility library > > % ps ax | grep system > 3441 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system > 16669 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto system > > % ps ax | head -n 2 > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND > 1 ? Ss 0:02 init [2] > > % dpkg -S /sbin/init > sysvinit-core: /sbin/init > > I have to add that the machine is a vserver where I have influence > on the kernel > > % cat /proc/cmdline > root=/dev/xvda1 > ip=95.129.55.223:127.0.255.255:95.129.55.193:255.255.255.192:vsrv28769.customer.xenway.de:eth0:off > I believe there was a deliberate decision not to include systemd in an upgrade, only in new installations. I tried an upgrade to systemd in unstable, after which it really was unstable, and I eventually reinstalled. When the time comes to upgrade my server, I'm currently inclined towards a reinstallation rather than upgrade in place. I've no doubt that an upgrade to systemd in a wheezy system already upgraded to jessie would be less of a problem than I had with unstable, but you really don't want avoidable trouble in a server. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 11:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdCLf-1sd-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158357 |
On Sun 27 Sep 2015 at 22:56:38 +0100, Joe wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:00:09 +0200 > Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > after the update from wheezy to jessie, there is no systemd running > > on my machine. I had the impression, that systemd is installed > > automatically...? > > > > % dpkg -l \*systemd\* | egrep \^ii > > ii libsystemd0:amd64 215-17+deb8u2 amd64 systemd > > utility library > > > > % ps ax | grep system > > 3441 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system > > 16669 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto system > > > > % ps ax | head -n 2 > > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND > > 1 ? Ss 0:02 init [2] > > > > % dpkg -S /sbin/init > > sysvinit-core: /sbin/init > > > > I have to add that the machine is a vserver where I have influence > > on the kernel > > > > % cat /proc/cmdline > > root=/dev/xvda1 > > ip=95.129.55.223:127.0.255.255:95.129.55.193:255.255.255.192:vsrv28769.customer.xenway.de:eth0:off > > > > I believe there was a deliberate decision not to include systemd in an > upgrade, only in new installations. Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#systemd https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 11:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdD4C-1Mi-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158369 |
On 28/09/2015 10:11, Brian wrote: > On Sun 27 Sep 2015 at 22:56:38 +0100, Joe wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:00:09 +0200 >> Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> after the update from wheezy to jessie, there is no systemd running >>> on my machine. I had the impression, that systemd is installed >>> automatically...? >>> >>> % dpkg -l \*systemd\* | egrep \^ii >>> ii libsystemd0:amd64 215-17+deb8u2 amd64 systemd >>> utility library >>> >>> % ps ax | grep system >>> 3441 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system >>> 16669 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto system >>> >>> % ps ax | head -n 2 >>> PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND >>> 1 ? Ss 0:02 init [2] >>> >>> % dpkg -S /sbin/init >>> sysvinit-core: /sbin/init >>> >>> I have to add that the machine is a vserver where I have influence >>> on the kernel >>> >>> % cat /proc/cmdline >>> root=/dev/xvda1 >>> ip=95.129.55.223:127.0.255.255:95.129.55.193:255.255.255.192:vsrv28769.customer.xenway.de:eth0:off >>> >> >> I believe there was a deliberate decision not to include systemd in an >> upgrade, only in new installations. > > Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will > install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#systemd > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system > Thanks, I haven't yet upgraded a wheezy to jessie. I had been under the impression, from previous systemd discussions, that an upgrade of stable would not by default switch to a systemd init. Clearly this is not the case, and it will. I'm not at all keen on doing that, I still favour a clean systemd-based installation for my server, with the associated configuration work. An upgraded stable will never be quite identical with a clean installation with the same requested packages, and I'm not planning on asking for more trouble than is absolutely necessary. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdF6p-4DC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158370 |
On Mon 28 Sep 2015 at 10:39:29 +0100, Joe wrote: > On 28/09/2015 10:11, Brian wrote: > >On Sun 27 Sep 2015 at 22:56:38 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > >>I believe there was a deliberate decision not to include systemd in an > >>upgrade, only in new installations. > > > >Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will > >install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#systemd > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system > > > Thanks, I haven't yet upgraded a wheezy to jessie. > > I had been under the impression, from previous systemd discussions, that an > upgrade of stable would not by default switch to a systemd init. Clearly > this is not the case, and it will. > > I'm not at all keen on doing that, I still favour a clean systemd-based > installation for my server, with the associated configuration work. An > upgraded stable will never be quite identical with a clean installation with > the same requested packages, and I'm not planning on asking for more trouble > than is absolutely necessary. Telling you that my server upgrade went well isn't much consolation because no doubt we have different setups. I'd suggest sticking with a sysvinit based dist-upgrade so any problems with that can be sorted out without any systemd anxiety. Then install systemd-sysv. After updating, either carry out the suggested pinning or install sysvinit-core to satisfy the dependency of the init package. You can always roll-back to sysvinit-core from systemd-sysv.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdJa1-4l8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158369 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Am 28.09.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Markus Grunwald: > Hello Brian, > >> Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will >> install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. > > I'm the original poster. I did nothing to prevent systemd-sysv being installed > (no pinning, no hold or the like), yet there's no systemd after my update... > Did you use "aptitude upgrade" when upgrading your system from wheezy to jessie? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780028 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdJD3-4SO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158380 |
On Monday 28 September 2015 17:06:55 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 28.09.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Markus Grunwald: > > Hello Brian, > > > >> Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will > >> install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. > > > > I'm the original poster. I did nothing to prevent systemd-sysv being > > installed (no pinning, no hold or the like), yet there's no systemd after > > my update... > > Did you use "aptitude upgrade" when upgrading your system from wheezy to > jessie? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780028 What happens if you do aptitude update, aptitude upgrade, aptitude full-upgrade? Which I would normally do. Yes, I know that I could suck it and see, but this is my workhorse. Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdKz8-6dR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158383 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Am 28.09.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Lisi Reisz: > On Monday 28 September 2015 17:06:55 Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 28.09.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Markus Grunwald: >>> Hello Brian, >>> >>>> Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will >>>> install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. >>> >>> I'm the original poster. I did nothing to prevent systemd-sysv being >>> installed (no pinning, no hold or the like), yet there's no systemd after >>> my update... >> >> Did you use "aptitude upgrade" when upgrading your system from wheezy to >> jessie? >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780028 > > What happens if you do aptitude update, aptitude upgrade, aptitude > full-upgrade? Which I would normally do. As you can read from the bug report, this will install sysvinit-core, and once sysvinit-core is installed, aptitude full-upgrade won't install systemd-sysv. > Yes, I know that I could suck it and see, but this is my workhorse. Since at least wheezy, apt-get dist-upgrade is the recommended method for a dist upgrade. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 20:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdLbP-7cd-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158389 |
On Monday 28 September 2015 18:38:35 Michael Biebl wrote: > Since at least wheezy, apt-get dist-upgrade is the recommended method > for a dist upgrade. Yes, I did apt-get for Wheezy - it was in the release notes. I haven't done an upgrade to Jessie yet (only a fresh install), and I hadn't taken in that apt-get was forever. In fact, I doubt that it is. Anyhow, I clearly want to use two stage aptitude when/if I do upgrade this machine to Jessie!! Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdJML-54p-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158380 |
Hello, > Did you use "aptitude upgrade" when upgrading your system from wheezy to > jessie? Yes, I did. I'm using aptitude since it was the preferred method ages ago and didn't see any reason to change this. Well, now it has changed ;) Thanks for your help! -- Markus Grunwald https://www.the-grue.de Fragen zur Mail? https://www.the-grue.de/mail_und_co https://www.the-grue.de/~markus/markus_grunwald.gpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdJa1-4l8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158369 |
Hello Brian, > Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will > install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. I'm the original poster. I did nothing to prevent systemd-sysv being installed (no pinning, no hold or the like), yet there's no systemd after my update... Strange, really. -- Markus Grunwald https://www.the-grue.de Fragen zur Mail? https://www.the-grue.de/mail_und_co https://www.the-grue.de/~markus/markus_grunwald.gpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie? |
| Message-ID | <qdJjI-4wk-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #158381 |
On Monday 28 September 2015 17:04:07 Markus Grunwald wrote: > Hello Brian, > > > Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will > > install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening. > > I'm the original poster. I did nothing to prevent systemd-sysv being > installed (no pinning, no hold or the like), yet there's no systemd after > my update... > > Strange, really. Had you previously done any pinning, say to a dependency, that you had forgotten about? Lisi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web