Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #161576 > unrolled thread

apt-get error messages

Started byKlaus Jantzen <k.d.jantzen@mailbox.org>
First post2015-12-05 20:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-05 21:30 +0100
Articles 11 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  apt-get error messages Klaus Jantzen <k.d.jantzen@mailbox.org> - 2015-12-05 20:00 +0100
    Re: apt-get error messages Myscelus <myscelus@mail.bg> - 2015-12-05 21:10 +0100
      Re: apt-get error messages Klaus Jantzen <k.d.jantzen@mailbox.org> - 2015-12-06 22:50 +0100
        Re: apt-get error messages Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2015-12-07 06:50 +0100
          Re: apt-get error messages Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-08 14:50 +0100
            Re: apt-get error messages Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org> - 2015-12-08 15:10 +0100
              Re: apt-get error messages Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-11 13:10 +0100
              Re: apt-get error messages kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 17:30 +0100
                Re: apt-get error messages Lee Fuller <leefuller23@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 19:40 +0100
                Re: apt-get error messages Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-12 10:30 +0100
    Re: apt-get error messages Alexandre GRIVEAUX <agriveaux@deutnet.info> - 2015-12-05 21:30 +0100

#161576 — apt-get error messages

FromKlaus Jantzen <k.d.jantzen@mailbox.org>
Date2015-12-05 20:00 +0100
Subjectapt-get error messages
Message-ID<qCqdQ-4I5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
but wrote 'i368' -
I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:

<msgs>
...

W: Failed to fetch
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release 
Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)

W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release 
Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)

W: Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release  Unable to find
expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release file (Wrong
sources.list entry or malformed file)

...
</msgs>

Where is the information for these erroneous requests stored?
How can I remove it?

Thanks for any hint. 
-- 

K.D.J.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#161578

FromMyscelus <myscelus@mail.bg>
Date2015-12-05 21:10 +0100
Message-ID<qCrjz-5D5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161576
On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
> but wrote 'i368' -
> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>
> <msgs>
> ...
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
> Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release
> Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release  Unable to find
> expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release file (Wrong
> sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> ...
> </msgs>
>
> Where is the information for these erroneous requests stored?
> How can I remove it?

dpkg --remove-architecture i368

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161614

FromKlaus Jantzen <k.d.jantzen@mailbox.org>
Date2015-12-06 22:50 +0100
Message-ID<qCPlU-3Xm-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161578
On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>> but wrote 'i368' -
>> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>>
>> <msgs>
>> ...
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
>> Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
>> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release
>> Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
>> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release  Unable to find
>> expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release file (Wrong
>> sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>
>> ...
>> </msgs>
>>
>> Where is the information for these erroneous requests stored?
>> How can I remove it?
>
> dpkg --remove-architecture i368
>
>

That seems to have done something.
At least the messages shown above disappeared when I said

dpkg --remove-architecture i368
apt-get update

But I cannot add the correct architecture:

dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get update
dpkg --print-architecture

just shows me 'amd64'.
'apt-get update' seems to have found some i386 packages
but the second architecture is not printed out.


-- 

K.D.J.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161622

FromMatthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de>
Date2015-12-07 06:50 +0100
Message-ID<qCWQp-li-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161614
Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
>> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>>> but wrote 'i368' -
>>> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>>>
>>> <msgs>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> W: Failed to fetch
>>> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
>>> Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
>>> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>>
>>> W: Failed to fetch
>>> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release
>>> Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
>>> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>>
>>> W: Failed to fetch
>>> http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release  Unable to find
>>> expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release file (Wrong
>>> sources.list entry or malformed file)
>>>
>>> ...
>>> </msgs>
>>>
>>> Where is the information for these erroneous requests stored?
>>> How can I remove it?
>>
>> dpkg --remove-architecture i368
>>
>>
> 
> That seems to have done something.
> At least the messages shown above disappeared when I said
> 
> dpkg --remove-architecture i368
> apt-get update
> 
> But I cannot add the correct architecture:
> 
> dpkg --add-architecture i386
> apt-get update
> dpkg --print-architecture
> 
> just shows me 'amd64'.
> 'apt-get update' seems to have found some i386 packages
> but the second architecture is not printed out.
> 
> 


That output is correct. "dpkg --print-architecture" shows the default architecture for which packages are installed.

Try 
dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
That should output "i386"

Matthias

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161627

FromChris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
Date2015-12-08 14:50 +0100
Message-ID<qDqOv-30G-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161622
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:48:45AM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> > dpkg --remove-architecture i368
> > apt-get update
> > 
> > But I cannot add the correct architecture:
> > 
> > dpkg --add-architecture i386
> > apt-get update
> > dpkg --print-architecture
> > 
> > just shows me 'amd64'.
> > 'apt-get update' seems to have found some i386 packages
> > but the second architecture is not printed out.
> 
> That output is correct. "dpkg --print-architecture" shows the default architecture for which packages are installed.
> 
> Try 
> dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
> That should output "i386"

*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
about.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161628

FromTony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org>
Date2015-12-08 15:10 +0100
Message-ID<qDr7Q-3nh-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161627
On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:

> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> about.
>
Because you haven't written it yet?

-- 
Tony van der Hoff        | mailto:tony@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161696

FromChris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
Date2015-12-11 13:10 +0100
Message-ID<qEuGm-43C-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161628
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:47:19PM +0000, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
> 
> >*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> >about.
> >
> Because you haven't written it yet?

No.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161698

Fromkamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-11 17:30 +0100
Message-ID<qEyJX-6SZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161628
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org> wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
>> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
>> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
>> about.
>>
> Because you haven't written it yet?
>

IMHO this is an inappropriate response. Not all users can be expected
to write software and submit patches. It is one thing to ask them to
file a wishlist bug, it is another thing to demand a patch from every
user who suggests a way to improve user experience.

-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161700

FromLee Fuller <leefuller23@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-11 19:40 +0100
Message-ID<qEALM-8a5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161698

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

At face value I'd assumed Tony was reflecting on the freedom a user has to
make something work how they want.

I didn't consider it as demanding, because unless he had offered to create
the features or rally the developers himself or point the OP to another
list, and assuming Tony wasn't overwhelmed by mutual consensus, if you want
something, surely nobody owes it to anyone except themselves to write it?

With sincerety, MHO.

-
- Lee Fuller
On 11 Dec 2015 4:27 p.m., "kamaraju kusumanchi" <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org>
> wrote:
> > On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> >> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> >> about.
> >>
> > Because you haven't written it yet?
> >
>
> IMHO this is an inappropriate response. Not all users can be expected
> to write software and submit patches. It is one thing to ask them to
> file a wishlist bug, it is another thing to demand a patch from every
> user who suggests a way to improve user experience.
>
> --
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161711

FromChris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
Date2015-12-12 10:30 +0100
Message-ID<qEOF4-iI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161698
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:27:15AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org> wrote:
> > On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> >> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> >> about.
> >>
> > Because you haven't written it yet?
> 
> IMHO this is an inappropriate response. Not all users can be expected
> to write software and submit patches. It is one thing to ask them to
> file a wishlist bug, it is another thing to demand a patch from every
> user who suggests a way to improve user experience.

I was approaching the issue more from a design perspective (I
could/should have left out the '*groan* *sigh* ...' and may be it would
have read better?)

e.g.

--print-architecture  lists the current, and
--print-foreign-architectures lists the extras

and no doubt (on reflexion) it was a consious decision not to also have
a '--print-architectures' for all of them. I guess,
'--print-architecture' which lists the one which dpkg was built for has
more value being a separate option so that when used in a scripting context 
you won't get confused just because of an 's'.

Perhaps there could be an option --print-all-architectures which would
save having to concatenating the output of '--print-architecture' and
'--print-foreign-architectures'? Is it used/needed by the end user often
enough to warrant it? e.g. is it asked of a poster to debian-user regularly 
enough?

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#161579

FromAlexandre GRIVEAUX <agriveaux@deutnet.info>
Date2015-12-05 21:30 +0100
Message-ID<qCrCW-5JB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#161576
> Hi,
>
> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
> but wrote 'i368' -
> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>
> <msgs>
> ...
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release 
> Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release 
> Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release
> file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release  Unable to find
> expected entry 'main/binary-i368/Packages' in Release file (Wrong
> sources.list entry or malformed file)
>
> ...
> </msgs>
>
> Where is the information for these erroneous requests stored?
> How can I remove it?
>
> Thanks for any hint. 
Hi,

Have you tried to remove i368 architecture ?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web