Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #274982 > unrolled thread

Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04) Matilda Sjöblom <matilda.sjoblom@recordedfuture.com> - 2024-11-29 10:00 +0100
    Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-11-29 10:20 +0100
      A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling using  apt (Ubuntu 20.04)] Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-11-29 15:20 +0100
        Re: A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling  using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)] Roger Price <debian@rogerprice.org> - 2024-11-29 18:00 +0100
          Re: A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling  using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)] Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-11-29 19:10 +0100
            synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?) Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 04:00 +0100
              Re: synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?) Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2024-11-30 15:30 +0100
              Re: synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?) Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 16:00 +0100
    Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04) Michael Kjörling <c9bc136c6063@ewoof.net> - 2024-11-29 11:00 +0100
      Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04) Bitfox <hi@bitfox.ddns.net> - 2024-11-29 13:40 +0100

#274982 — Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi!

We've had issues for the last couple of days regarding installing Erling
via apt. I can run apt update with all of our other repos, but when I add
the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/erlang_solutions_repo.list , and the run
sudo apt update, I get this error:

Hit:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
Packages
Ign:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
Packages
Hit:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
Packages
Err:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
Packages
  Could not create temporary file for Expected-Checksum-FileSize: 3240471 -
mkstemp (13: Permission denied)
Fetched 3965 B in 1s (3546 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
file or directory)
W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
file or directory)
W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
file or directory)
E: Failed to fetch store:/  Could not create temporary file for
Expected-Checksum-FileSize: 3240471 - mkstemp (13: Permission denied)
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.

I have triple checked ownership of files, tried to run apt-get clean, etc
etc, nothing works. The exact same setup (Ubuntu 20.04) worked on the 11th
of November.

Has something on your side changed since then?

Kind regards,
-- 

Matilda Sjöblom

*Senior Operations Engineer*

+46736997252

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#274983

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Matilda Sjöblom wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> We've had issues for the last couple of days regarding installing Erling
> via apt. I can run apt update with all of our other repos, but when I add
> the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/erlang_solutions_repo.list , and the run
> sudo apt update, I get this error:
> 
> Hit:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
> Packages
> Ign:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
> Packages
> Hit:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
> Packages
> Err:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
> Packages
>   Could not create temporary file for Expected-Checksum-FileSize: 3240471 -
> mkstemp (13: Permission denied)
> Fetched 3965 B in 1s (3546 B/s)
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
> file or directory)
> W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
> file or directory)
> W: Symlinking file  to  failed - pkgAcqIndex::StageDownloadDone (2: No such
> file or directory)
> E: Failed to fetch store:/  Could not create temporary file for
> Expected-Checksum-FileSize: 3240471 - mkstemp (13: Permission denied)
> E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
> used instead.
> 
> I have triple checked ownership of files, tried to run apt-get clean, etc
> etc, nothing works. The exact same setup (Ubuntu 20.04) worked on the 11th
> of November.
> 
> Has something on your side changed since then?

This looks very much like a packaging problem on erlang-solutions.com's side.
So I'd first check with them (reading between the lines, something seems to
try creating a symlink of a nameless file to a nameless place, but that's just
a guess).

As a second, you seem to be using Ubuntu's version of apt, so if you suspect
that, I'd recommend asking Ubuntu for that.

Cheers
-- 
tomás

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#274987 — A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)]

On 11/29/24 3:14 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Matilda Sjöblom wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We've had issues for the last couple of days regarding installing Erling
>> via apt. I can run apt update with all of our other repos, but when I add
>> the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/erlang_solutions_repo.list , and the run
>> sudo apt update, I get this error:
>>
>> Hit:6 https://packages.erlang-solutions.com/debian focal/contrib amd64
>> Packages
[ *SNIP* ]
>>
>> I have triple checked ownership of files, tried to run apt-get clean, etc
>> etc, nothing works. The exact same setup (Ubuntu 20.04) worked on the 11th
>> of November.
>>
>> Has something on your side changed since then?
> 
> This looks very much like a packaging problem on erlang-solutions.com's side.
> So I'd first check with them (reading between the lines, something seems to
> try creating a symlink of a nameless file to a nameless place, but that's just
> a guess).

As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's search 
function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package name, but 
several in description field.

I then tried to visit https://www.erlang-solutions.com/ .
I received the message:
> Bad gateway Error code 502
> Cloudflare protects this website > Visit cloudflare.com for more information.
> 2024-11-29 14:03:48 UTC
Cloudfare's non-informative message was:
> Cloudflare protects this website
> But, something went wrong trying to reach it

[snip]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#274988 — Re: A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)]

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote:
> As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's search 
> function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package name, but several 
> in description field.

I'm guessing Erling is a typo for Erlang, an excellent concurrent, real time, 
distributed functional programming language.

Roger

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#274989 — Re: A more fundemental error? - was [Re: Issues installing Erling using apt (Ubuntu 20.04)]

On 11/29/24 10:58 AM, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's 
>> search function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package name, 
>> but several in description field.
> 
> I'm guessing Erling is a typo for Erlang, an excellent concurrent, real 
> time, distributed functional programming language.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 

*MY* reference to  "Erling" *IS* a typo. I did the tests with  "Erlang".
I used copy-n-paste in tests 'cause I'm a licy tipist ;}

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#275000 — synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?)

On 30/11/2024 01:00, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>> As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's 
>>> search function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package 
>>> name, but several in description field.
> 
> *MY* reference to  "Erling" *IS* a typo. I did the tests with  "Erlang".
> I used copy-n-paste in tests 'cause I'm a licy tipist ;}

     apt list '~nerlang'

gives more than 100 package names.
<https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm&searchon=names&keywords=erlang>
adds a warning that not all packages are listed due to excessive number.

I do not use synaptic, so I have no idea if it is possible to break 
search by changing its settings. I would start from inspection of apt 
sources

     apt policy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#275019 — Re: synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?)

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:55:45 +0700
Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/11/2024 01:00, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote:  
> >>> As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's 
> >>> search function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package 
> >>> name, but several in description field.  
> > 
> > *MY* reference to  "Erling" *IS* a typo. I did the tests with
> > "Erlang". I used copy-n-paste in tests 'cause I'm a licy tipist ;}  
> 
>      apt list '~nerlang'
> 
> gives more than 100 package names.
> <https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm&searchon=names&keywords=erlang>
> adds a warning that not all packages are listed due to excessive
> number.
> 
> I do not use synaptic, so I have no idea if it is possible to break 
> search by changing its settings. I would start from inspection of apt 
> sources
> 
>      apt policy
> 

Something I forgot to mention earlier, for anyone who does use
Synaptic. There is an additional search available, using Xapian. The
package is apt-xapian-index, I find it more useful than the built-in
search function.

-- 
Joe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#275021 — Re: synaptic search (was: Re: A more fundemental error?)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024, 8:56 PM Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/11/2024 01:00, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>> As the OP's link explicitly referenced "debian" I used Synaptic's
> >>> search function. There were no packages with "Erling" in package
> >>> name, but several in description field.
> >
> > *MY* reference to  "Erling" *IS* a typo. I did the tests with  "Erlang".
> > I used copy-n-paste in tests 'cause I'm a licy tipist ;}
>
>      apt list '~nerlang'
>
> gives more than 100 package names.
> <
> https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm&searchon=names&keywords=erlang
> >
> adds a warning that not all packages are listed due to excessive number.


For some reason which I never understood, the maintainers of erlang chose
several years ago to split-up their standard runtime libraries into many
separate installable packages. I thought it was not a good idea and I never
heard what their rationale was. Since then I build erlang from source
rather than use them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#274984

On 29 Nov 2024 09:36 +0100, from matilda.sjoblom@recordedfuture.com (Matilda Sjöblom):
> I have triple checked ownership of files, tried to run apt-get clean, etc
> etc, nothing works. The exact same setup (Ubuntu 20.04) worked on the 11th
> of November.
> 
> Has something on your side changed since then?

You probably should direct your question to either an Ubuntu forum, or
through whatever support channel erlang-solutions.com suggests.

While Debian and Ubuntu are similar in some respects (for example by
using the same package management tools, modulo exact versions), it's
always better to ask people who are likely familiar with what you are
running.

I do hope you find an answer to your question, but debian-user is not
the correct place to ask questions about installation of third-party
packages on Ubuntu.

-- 
Michael Kjörling
🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#274986

On 2024-11-29 17:49, Michael Kjörling wrote:

> 
> While Debian and Ubuntu are similar in some respects (for example by
> using the same package management tools, modulo exact versions), it's
> always better to ask people who are likely familiar with what you are
> running.
> 

I found debian 12 has much difference than ubuntu.
for example, mysql in debian 12 is not a default apt package, but in 
ubuntu 22 it is.
and, as my last thread shows, debian 12 has no plain text logs by 
default.
also the snap way is different than ubuntu.

Just my limited experience.
Thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web