Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #274137 > unrolled thread

Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

Started byRichard Owlett <rowlett@access.net>
First post2024-10-29 11:50 +0100
Last post2024-10-29 12:20 +0100
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-10-29 11:50 +0100
    NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-10-29 12:00 +0100
      Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ  installed <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-10-29 12:00 +0100
        Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ  installed Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-10-29 12:30 +0100
      OOPS Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ  installed Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> - 2024-10-29 12:20 +0100

#274137 — Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

FromRichard Owlett <rowlett@access.net>
Date2024-10-29 11:50 +0100
SubjectDocumenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed
Message-ID<JCRXr-54OY-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
I am trying to track what I suspect is a documentation bug. There are 
circular references. To logically break the chain I need to know the 
date package XYZ was installed.

I thought this would be an "apt" related question. But its manpage gave 
no indication that "when installed" is recorded.

Is there at least a way to track what required XYZ to be installed?

TIA

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#274139 — NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

FromRichard Owlett <rowlett@access.net>
Date2024-10-29 12:00 +0100
SubjectNOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed
Message-ID<JCS77-54Sh-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#274137
Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt".

On 10/29/24 5:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I am trying to track what I suspect is a documentation bug. There are 
> circular references. To logically break the chain I need to know the 
> date package XYZ was installed.
> 
> I thought this would be an "apt" related question. But its manpage gave 
> no indication that "when installed" is recorded.
> 
> Is there at least a way to track what required XYZ to be installed?
> 
> TIA
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#274140 — Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

From<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date2024-10-29 12:00 +0100
SubjectRe: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed
Message-ID<JCS77-54Sh-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#274139

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:53:38AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt".

/var/log/apt/*

Cheers
-- 
t

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#274142 — Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

FromRichard Owlett <rowlett@access.net>
Date2024-10-29 12:30 +0100
SubjectRe: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed
Message-ID<JCSA9-55hp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#274140
On 10/29/24 5:56 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:53:38AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt".
> 
> /var/log/apt/*
> 
> Cheers
> 

Thank you. Problem solved. Was no documentation bug.
I forgot what I did late last night ;}

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#274141 — OOPS Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

FromRichard Owlett <rowlett@access.net>
Date2024-10-29 12:20 +0100
SubjectOOPS Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed
Message-ID<JCSqt-55eh-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#274139
SeaMonkey has a bug. I had chosen "Reply to sender only".
Obviously it went to the list. I didn't proof the "To:" ;{
I'll report the bug.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web