Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #269194 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-05-04 22:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-05-07 22:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Kvm Bridge Network Problem "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-05-04 22:30 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem, VM accessing the host Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> - 2024-05-05 08:10 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-05 09:00 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-05 09:40 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-07 03:00 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-07 03:20 +0200
Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2024-05-07 22:30 +0200
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-04 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Kvm Bridge Network Problem |
| Message-ID | <IAub8-b6iv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
I am running Bookworm on my main platform. After quite a bit of googling and many errors and much head scratching I have managed to follow the instructions in: https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-add-network-bridge-with-nmcli-networkmanager-on-linux/ . I have currently implicated this on a Windows 10 client. However, there still remains a problem. After the first restart of the Windows client the internet was accessible. However, a problem arose after I successfully installed br0 (copy attached). I was able to use the LAN printer and the 40" TV , but could not access the Host. I'm sure that I have missed something, but I don't know what. Guidance to a solution to the problem would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. https://insilicochemistry.net (614)312-7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-05 08:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem, VM accessing the host |
| Message-ID | <IADep-bc9D-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269194 |
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 04:26:07PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I am running Bookworm on my main platform. After quite a bit of googling and > many errors and much head scratching I have managed to follow the > instructions in: > > https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-add-network-bridge-with-nmcli-networkmanager-on-linux/ > . > > I have currently implicated this on a Windows 10 client. However, there > still remains a problem. After the first restart of the Windows client the > internet was accessible. However, a problem arose after I successfully > installed br0 (copy attached). I was able to use the LAN printer and the 40" > TV , but could not access the Host. Ah, the VM guest can not access the host. (I changed 'Subject: Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem' into 'Subject: Re: Kvm Bridge Network Problem, VM accessing the host') > I'm sure that I have missed something, but I don't know what. Network switches only forward packets. > Guidance to a solution to the problem would be appreciated. I have been where O.P. is, the challenge^Wproblem is real. > # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system > # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). > > source /etc/network/interfaces.d/* > > # The loopback network interface > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > # Specify that the physical interface that should be connected to the bridge > # should be configured manually, to avoid conflicts with NetworkManager > iface enp2s0 inet manual > > #Primary network interface with bridge > auto br0 > iface br0 inet static > address 162.237.98.238 > broadcast 162.237.98.255 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > gateway 162.237.98.1 > bridge_ports enp2s0 > bridge_stp off > bridge_waitport 0 > bridge fd 0 That brigde configuration looks good, even might be good. The thing is that host and VM are at the same interface of the network switch. And network switches only forward packets. It is a "physical law" in computer networking. Hopefully brings this email thread the jargon name of the "problem". If direct connection between host and the VM guest is important, then add such connection and take the costs it brings. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-05 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IAE0N-bcpN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269194 |
On Sat 04/05/2024 at 21:26, Stephen P. Molnar <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ... > I have managed to follow the > instructions in: > > https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-add-network-bridge-with-nmcli-networkmanager-on-linux/ > ... > I was able to use the LAN > printer and the 40" TV , but could not access the Host. Hi Stephen, That might suggest NAT is still operative for the VM. Did you do the "optional" part of the tutorial in your link too, re KVM network config? What is the output of # nmcli con show # nmcli device # virsh net-list --all # virsh net-dumpxml yourNetworkName I don't have a network cable to hand to test this at the moment (wifi NIC bridging is complex if possible with KVM [1] and apples and oranges and all that) but will do later if your problem is not solved. I think the presence of enp2s0 in /e/n/i (which your attachment seems to be) prevents NM from managing it, but if I'm wrong about that, could it be getting an address (static or otherwise) from NM? Gareth [1] https://hacktivate.it/posts/kvm-bridge-wireless/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-05 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IAEDv-bcS1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269196 |
On Sun 05/05/2024 at 07:53, Gareth Evans <donotspam@fastmail.fm> wrote: > That might suggest NAT is still operative for the VM. Ah, I hadn't seen Geert's reply, which I think is closer to the mark :) This gives a routing-based approach: https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Networking This creates an isolated network between host and guest, which without routing presumably is additional to the default network, and the (Ubuntu-based) netplan stuff needs substituting with /e/n/i adjustments: https://www.nodinrogers.com/post/2022-01-06-enabling-kvm-host-to-vm-communcation/ All of which I have yet to test but have been meaning to look into this again. HTH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-07 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IBhlv-bB12-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269197 |
On host:
$ ip a|grep wl
3: wlp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
inet 192.168.1.100/24 ...
Using:
virt-manager > Edit > Connection Details > Virtual Networks > Add network
Mode: Routed
Network: 192.168.200.0/24
Accept default DHCP range
Forward to: physical device
Device: wlp1s0 [this is my physical wifi card]
Then:
$ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
Then check:
$ ip link
<snip>
6: virbr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:54:ed:48 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master virbr0 state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:54:00:9b:a7:8e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Start VM, check DHCP address assigned
On VM guest:
$ ip a|grep enp
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
inet 192.168.200.151/24 ...
At this point (with firewalls temporarily off) I was able to ssh to and from host and VM guest using their respective IP addresses.
After adding a static route on my wireless router:
192.168.200.0/24 via 192.168.1.100 (to paraphrase the web form)
I installed apache2 on the VM guest and was able to access
http://192.168.200.151
from my phone over wifi, and websites on the host from the VM guest.
Firewalld actived on host with ssh and https services allowed - ssh and web browsing worked as before.
No nf/iptables jiggery-pokery, but static route on router required.
Perhaps not the most efficient solution, but I try to avoid too many firewall rules because they make my head spin :)
Don't think I've omitted any steps.
Does that help?
Best wishes,
Gareth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-07 03:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IBhES-bBmM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269216 |
On Tue 07/05/2024 at 01:51, Gareth Evans <donotspam@fastmail.fm> wrote: I did miss a step. > Start VM, check DHCP address assigned should be > Edit the VM NIC settings and choose your routed network connection from the "Network Source" dropdown. Apply changes. > Start VM, check DHCP address assigned I actually deleted other vibrX devices and networks before starting, but I don't think that matters. G
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-07 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IBzBL-bMg9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269218 |
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:17:05AM +0100, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 07/05/2024 at 01:51, Gareth Evans wrote: > > I did miss a step. > > > Start VM, check DHCP address assigned > > should be > > > Edit the VM NIC settings and choose your routed network connection from the "Network Source" dropdown. Apply changes. > > > Start VM, check DHCP address assigned > > I actually deleted other vibrX devices and networks before starting, but I don't think that matters. > > G For the sake of the archive: Place _all_ steps in one email. Preferable in reply to the original posting. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web