Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #262589 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-10-23 10:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-10-24 05:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-10-23 10:50 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-10-23 11:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-23 15:40 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly jleonard@slimy.com (Jon Leonard) - 2023-10-23 16:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 16:40 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-23 17:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-10-23 18:40 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-10-23 20:10 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 21:50 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-10-23 22:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-23 22:30 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-10-23 22:50 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-23 23:00 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 07:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 18:10 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-24 21:30 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly conover@panix.com (John Conover) - 2023-10-25 01:00 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly jleonard@slimy.com (Jon Leonard) - 2023-10-25 04:20 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 04:40 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-10-25 06:30 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 07:40 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 08:00 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 18:30 +0200
Re: 12.2: fork() causing getline() to repeat stdin endlessly Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-10-24 05:00 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-25 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HsEMx-GmD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #262674 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:02 PM Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24/10/2023 12:18, tom kronmiller wrote: > > so I unbuffered stdin and that seemed to make it happy. > It might be performance killer. Even fflush(NULL) before fork() may be > better. > In the real program in question, it hardly matters. It is very heavily compute-bound on inputs which are small. But flushing() the files seems a better idea in general than unbuffering, so I changed it. (Still works.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tom kronmiller <twk.personal@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-25 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HsF5T-Grg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #262701 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:35 AM tom kronmiller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:02 PM Max Nikulin wrote: > >> On 24/10/2023 12:18, tom kronmiller wrote: >> > so I unbuffered stdin and that seemed to make it happy. >> It might be performance killer. Even fflush(NULL) before fork() may be >> better. >> > In the real program in question, it hardly matters. It is very heavily > compute-bound on inputs which are small. But flushing() the files seems a > better idea in general than unbuffering, so I changed it. (Still works.) > By the way, one last way to get in trouble: fflush(NULL) only flushes output files, so an explicit fflush(stdin) is still needed. "If the stream argument is NULL, fflush() flushes all open *output* streams" per the man page on my system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-23 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Hs5Yt-jHU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #262589 |
On 23/10/2023 15:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > - Why no "fork() = " after the lines which show their number for the > first time ? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2530663/printf-anomaly-after-fork fork clones stdout buffer and child exit flushes its content.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-24 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HsfO9-q51-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #262615 |
Max Nikulin [2023-10-23 23:25:33] wrote:
> On 23/10/2023 15:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> - Why no "fork() = " after the lines which show their number for the first
>> time ?
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2530663/printf-anomaly-after-fork
> fork clones stdout buffer and child exit flushes its content.
That makes sense: I though it's odd that `fork` would touch those file
descriptors (or worse the stdio buffers), but indeed the problem could
very well come from `exit`.
Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web