Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #265650 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas B <panden@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-01-08 13:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2024-01-08 13:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew Andreas B <panden@gmail.com> - 2024-01-08 13:20 +0100
Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-01-08 13:30 +0100
| From | Andreas B <panden@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-01-08 13:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew |
| Message-ID | <HTWLL-1FCa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
A follow up on this. I recently swapped my ISP's router with my own. New temp-addresses are now generated when old ones become deprecated, as expected. I haven't checked thoroughly (yet), but the only immediate difference I can see, is that the router lifetime is 600 seconds (RA). My ISP's router used a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24h), I think. Best, Andreas
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-01-08 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HTWVr-1FFc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #265650 |
Am 08.01.2024 um 13:01:38 Uhr schrieb Andreas B:
> I haven't checked thoroughly (yet), but the only immediate difference
> I can see, is that the router lifetime is 600 seconds (RA). My ISP's
> router used a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24h), I think.
That affect when the old addresses must be removed from the interface.
Check
valid_lft 582619sec preferred_lft 63918sec
in ip a for each address.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web