Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #265159 > unrolled thread

netatalk not on bookworm

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  netatalk not on bookworm Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-12-22 20:40 +0100
    Re: netatalk not on bookworm Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-12-23 00:30 +0100
      Re: netatalk not on bookworm Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-12-23 00:50 +0100
      Re: netatalk not on bookworm Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-12-26 21:20 +0100
        Re: netatalk not on bookworm john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2023-12-27 08:20 +0100
    Re: netatalk not on bookworm Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2024-01-19 01:00 +0100

#265159 — netatalk not on bookworm

On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still present
but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the server.

Is there a known fix or workaround for this?

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#265173

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:

> On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> server.
> 
> Is there a known fix or workaround for this?

The reason there was no daemon running is that during the upgrade the
netatalk package was removed, but not purged.

I was able to build from source per the instructions at
https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk.git".

One gotcha is that the libtools package does not provide libtools. It
provides libtoolize. The package libtool-bin provides libtool.

All in all, I had to install the following:

apt install libtool-bin libgcrypt20-dev libdb-dev libevent-dev \
ibavahi-core-dev libavahi-compat-libdnssd-dev

And my Mac reports a successful backup.

Folks with more complicated setups may require other packages.

You may also find this page useful:
https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/wiki/Installing-Netatalk-3-on-Debian-and-Ubuntu

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265174

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 6:25 PM Charles Curley
<charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
> Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:
>
> > On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> > been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> > present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> > server.
> >
> > Is there a known fix or workaround for this?
>
> The reason there was no daemon running is that during the upgrade the
> netatalk package was removed, but not purged.
>
> I was able to build from source per the instructions at
> https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
> starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk.git".
>
> One gotcha is that the libtools package does not provide libtools. It
> provides libtoolize. The package libtool-bin provides libtool.

On OS X, I believe you need to run glibtool.

If you are building libtool from sources on OS X, then be sure to use
the configure option that adds the "g" prefix so the output binary is
glibtool, and not libtool.

> All in all, I had to install the following:
>
> apt install libtool-bin libgcrypt20-dev libdb-dev libevent-dev \
> ibavahi-core-dev libavahi-compat-libdnssd-dev
>
> And my Mac reports a successful backup.
>
> Folks with more complicated setups may require other packages.
>
> You may also find this page useful:
> https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/wiki/Installing-Netatalk-3-on-Debian-and-Ubuntu

Jeff

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265281

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:25:11 -0700
Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:

> I was able to build from source per the instructions at
> https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
> starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk.git".

Well, that didn't work. I got two good backups, then the Mac stopped
communicating with the server.

Now what?

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265298

On 12/26/23 21:13, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:25:11 -0700
> Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:
>
>> I was able to build from source per the instructions at
>> https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
>> starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk.git".
>
> Well, that didn't work. I got two good backups, then the Mac stopped
> communicating with the server.
>
> Now what?
>


Can't you increase the verbosity to debug (see [1] "./configure --help"
and [2] "debug options")?

If you rebuild from source, does it work again for a few backups (the
README file has the project mailing list)?

HTH.

[1] https://gist.github.com/SuperShinyEyes/de17c8092df2ed525930e339235d624e
[2] https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/2.0/htmldocs/afpd.conf.5.html

--
John Doe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#266238

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> wrote:

> On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> server.
> 
> Is there a known fix or workaround for this?

I ended up with a completely different solution.
https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/discussions/574#discussioncomment-7951797

It is running on my desktop. I've gotten one good backup, and I can
peruse the backups in the Time Machine app. We will see how it goes.

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web