Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #264035 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-12-01 16:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-12-01 22:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Mailing List Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-12-01 16:30 +0100
Re: Mailing List Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-12-01 17:00 +0100
Re: Mailing List Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-12-01 17:20 +0100
Re: Mailing List Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-12-01 17:40 +0100
Re: Mailing List David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-12-01 22:10 +0100
| From | Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-01 16:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Mailing List |
| Message-ID | <HGdCN-anpf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Am 01.12.2023 um 10:05:02 Uhr schrieb Pocket: > I get > > > Error: Overload > > On the https://lists.debian.org/users.html page Works perfectly fine for me.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-01 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HGe5Q-anxJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #264035 |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:25:56 +0100 Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> wrote: > Am 01.12.2023 um 10:05:02 Uhr schrieb Pocket: > > > I get > > > > > > Error: Overload > > > > On the https://lists.debian.org/users.html page > > Works perfectly fine for me. > I received a message timed 22:52 on 28th, the last that day, the next three were on 29th at 08:39 13:14 15:55 then normal flow was resumed, which is typically about 50 messages per day. So yes, there was a problem. Times UTC by the way. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-01 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HGepc-anW0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #264039 |
Am 01.12.2023 um 15:55:41 Uhr schrieb Joe: > I received a message timed 22:52 on 28th, the last that day, the next > three were on 29th at > 08:39 > 13:14 > 15:55 > then normal flow was resumed, which is typically about 50 messages per > day. > > So yes, there was a problem. > Times UTC by the way. IIRC the amount of messages varies depending on how much people take part in discussions. I don't think the current behavior is unusual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-01 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HGeIx-anZE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #264041 |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:12:56 +0100 Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> wrote: > Am 01.12.2023 um 15:55:41 Uhr schrieb Joe: > > > I received a message timed 22:52 on 28th, the last that day, the > > next three were on 29th at > > 08:39 > > 13:14 > > 15:55 > > then normal flow was resumed, which is typically about 50 messages > > per day. > > > > So yes, there was a problem. > > Times UTC by the way. > > IIRC the amount of messages varies depending on how much people take > part in discussions. > > I don't think the current behavior is unusual. > No, it's fine now, but there definitely was a blockage on the 29th. It returned to normal about 16:00 UTC and has been OK since then. -- Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-01 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HGiVP-aqAu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #264046 |
On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 16:32:44 (+0000), Joe wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:12:56 +0100 > Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> wrote: > > Am 01.12.2023 um 15:55:41 Uhr schrieb Joe: > > > > > I received a message timed 22:52 on 28th, the last that day, the > > > next three were on 29th at > > > 08:39 > > > 13:14 > > > 15:55 > > > then normal flow was resumed, which is typically about 50 messages > > > per day. > > > > > > So yes, there was a problem. > > > Times UTC by the way. > > > > IIRC the amount of messages varies depending on how much people take > > part in discussions. > > > > I don't think the current behavior is unusual. > > > > No, it's fine now, but there definitely was a blockage on the 29th. It > returned to normal about 16:00 UTC and has been OK since then. I can certainly see the gap you mention—I got nothing from the list between 2023-11-28 22:34:58+00:00 (arrived in ~Manchester 2023-11-28T22:35:24+00:00) and 2023-11-29 17:49:37+00:00 (arrived 2023-11-29T17:50:03+00:00) /unless/ I just happen to have deleted everything in that period (unlikely as I have the entirety of gene's thread). Looking at everything I still have from the list over 28th/29th (in Central time), I only see two trivial delays between posting and delivery here: Felix M (~5 min) and Dan R (15 min). What I don't see is any posts sent during that gap but delivered afterwards. PS Your clock is ahead, Dan P. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web