Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #247995 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Alternatives to ISC dhcp-client ? Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl> - 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200
Re: Alternatives to ISC dhcp-client ? john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200
| From | Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Alternatives to ISC dhcp-client ? |
| Message-ID | <EkSqd-e7Zm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl> writes: [...] >> >> But systemd-networkd also has a huge number of configuration options >> that may do what you want anyway >> >> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html > > Hm. Can you create bridge without ports with systemd-networkd? > i.e. > Another question. Can I pass option during interface up/down? For example, in my if-up*/if-down* scripts I have code for replacing (or not!) default route when needed.[1] Then I can execute something like: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ifup wlan0 -o replacedefaultroute=on --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- how I can achieve this with networkctl (or other systemd tool)? Moreover https://gitlab.com/craftyguy/networkd-dispatcher/-/issues/61 So my migration probes are not very promising :/ I take into account that I have some habits and some thing should be done completely different way[2]. But for now I even don't know if some things can be achieved. KJ [1] in man systemd.network I found --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [DHCPV4] UseRoutes= --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- but I am not sure if this is about default routes or only classless static routes [2] - I had to spent some time to "properly" translate my iptables rules/scripts to nftables ones (using sets and maps instead simple iptables -I ... nad iptables -D ... command). -- http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-08 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EkSqd-e7Zm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #247995 |
On 5/8/2022 6:33 PM, Kamil Jońca wrote: > Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl> writes: > > [...] >>> >>> But systemd-networkd also has a huge number of configuration options >>> that may do what you want anyway >>> >>> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html >> >> Hm. Can you create bridge without ports with systemd-networkd? >> i.e. >> > > Another question. Can I pass option during interface up/down? > For example, in my if-up*/if-down* scripts I have code for replacing (or > not!) default route when needed.[1] > > Then I can execute something like: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ifup wlan0 -o replacedefaultroute=on > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > how I can achieve this with networkctl (or other systemd tool)? > > Moreover https://gitlab.com/craftyguy/networkd-dispatcher/-/issues/61 > So my migration probes are not very promising :/ > > I take into account that I have some habits and some thing should be > done completely different way[2]. But for now I even don't know if some > things can be achieved. > You might be better off asking this on the appropriate mailing list! :) -- John Doe
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web