Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #242494 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@surfnaked.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-11-28 21:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-12-03 04:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@surfnaked.ca> - 2021-11-28 21:20 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-11-28 22:20 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-11-30 11:50 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-12-02 04:40 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-12-02 08:10 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-12-02 12:20 +0100
Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-12-03 04:00 +0100
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@surfnaked.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-28 21:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <DoyOu-8qM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun Nov 28 11:38:54 2021 Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600 > David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote: >> >>> Celejar writes: >>> >>>> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA >>>> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font >>>> installed, or do they see tofu? >>> >>> I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts >>> (or any other fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the tofu. >> >> Questions like this remind me how little I understand font handling. >> I read mail in mutt in xterm in fvwm in X, currently in buster, and >> I see four glyphs. If I save the email in a file, then I see the > > ... > >> I wrote /four/ glyphs, but it sounds as if Celejar sees three, >> the first one being coloured with some sort of skin tone. My >> second glyph, π», is a half-tone box with three lines of dots >> inside, of 3, 4 and 3 dots. > > I assume that the reason I see three and you see four is that the > first one (of my three) consists of a combination of the basic > "blond haired person" glyph plus a "light skin tone" modifier glyph, > which are presumably ideally supposed to be displayed together: > > https://emojiterra.com/blond-haired-person-light-skin-tone/ Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence at every perceived slight or sign of racial or sexual discrimination, however minor. Yet these same people are eagerly leaving behind the originally all-text form of e-mail - which has no glyphs that portray such differences - in favour of graphics that are gleefully being used to highlight them. Why is nobody being "triggered" by this? -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Microsoft is a dictatorship. \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | Apple is a cult. X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | Linux is anarchy. / \ if you read it the right way. | Pick your poison.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-28 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <DozKx-xW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242494 |
On Sun 28 Nov 2021 at 11:54:16 (-0800), Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Sun Nov 28 11:38:54 2021 Celejar wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600 David Wright wrote:
> >> On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> >>> Celejar writes:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> >>>> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> >>>> installed, or do they see tofu?
> >>>
> >>> I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts
> >>> (or any other fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the tofu.
> >>
> >> Questions like this remind me how little I understand font handling.
> >> I read mail in mutt in xterm in fvwm in X, currently in buster, and
> >> I see four glyphs. If I save the email in a file, then I see the
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> I wrote /four/ glyphs, but it sounds as if Celejar sees three,
> >> the first one being coloured with some sort of skin tone. My
> >> second glyph, π», is a half-tone box with three lines of dots
> >> inside, of 3, 4 and 3 dots.
> >
> > I assume that the reason I see three and you see four is that the
> > first one (of my three) consists of a combination of the basic
> > "blond haired person" glyph plus a "light skin tone" modifier glyph,
> > which are presumably ideally supposed to be displayed together:
> >
> > https://emojiterra.com/blond-haired-person-light-skin-tone/
>
> Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living
> in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence
> at every perceived slight or sign of racial or sexual discrimination,
> however minor. Yet these same people are eagerly leaving behind the
> originally all-text form of e-mail - which has no glyphs that portray
> such differences - in favour of graphics that are gleefully being used
> to highlight them. Why is nobody being "triggered" by this?
That assumes that I look at the emojis and have a clue what they
mean. I'm really only interested in this conversation in order to get
a more complete repertoire of Unicode displayed correctly. If you were
to look at my personal quick-view chart of Unicode, I think you'd see
that emojis are distinctly lacking. Currently I print:
ranges = [range(0x20, 0x520, 32),
range(0x2000, 0x2be0, 32),
range(0x2e00, 0x2e40, 32),
range(0x3000, 0x3020, 32),]
Some of these look as if they're combining forms (like the accents
and squiggles, for want of a better word), but I've not found an
opportunity to see clearly whether combining forms actually combine,
before this. (Ie, the result would be an obvious change in glyphs.)
Cheers,
David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <Dp8RX-4JC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242494 |
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living >in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence >at every perceived slight or sign of racial or sexual discrimination, >however minor. Yet these same people are eagerly leaving behind the >originally all-text form of e-mail Since we're talking about my email signature here, this characterisation you've described is meant to be me. I don't know what *I've* done for you to describe me that way, but at best it's irrelevant to debian-user. It's perjorative, and I would ask that you stop writing perjoratively about me on this mailing list, and go and re-read the Code of Conduct for participating in Debian. >eagerly leaving behind the originally all-text form of e-mail Unicode *is* text, as far as I'm concerned. I don't see the point in limiting what I write to a 7-bit namespace from the 1960s, even if I am fortunate enough that my chosen names are representable in it. >in favour of graphics that are gleefully being used to highlight them. My signature includes an emoji which is configured to be a reasonable approximation of my appearance. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. π±π» Jonathan Dowland β jmtd@debian.org π https://jmtd.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 04:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <DpL6V-2tX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242545 |
[Multipart message β attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue 30 Nov 2021 at 10:47:07 (+0000), Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > > eagerly leaving behind the originally all-text form of e-mail > > Unicode *is* text, as far as I'm concerned. I don't see the point in > limiting what I write to a 7-bit namespace from the 1960s, even if I am > fortunate enough that my chosen names are representable in it. I agree. It's almost as important that people read, or can switch to, a fixed width font when reading technical lists like this one. > > in favour of graphics that are gleefully being used to highlight them. > > My signature includes an emoji which is configured to be a reasonable > approximation of my appearance. β¦ bearing in mind that what we see depends on the fonts we have installed. Until Sunday, your emoji had the bouffant/flip of Mary Tyler Moore, but then she got older and lost the flip. If I reverse the colours of the latter, it becomes more like a mop with a parting, say John Lennon before he grew it long. As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a mischievous kid's cartoon character. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 08:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <DpOo9-4Dq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242593 |
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote: >As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but >throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a >mischievous kid's cartoon character. That's exactly what I look like ;) -- Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list. π±π» Jonathan Dowland β jmtd@debian.org π https://jmtd.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <DpSi5-6WL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242602 |
[Multipart message β attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
* On 2021 02 Dec 01:07 -0600, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but > > throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a > > mischievous kid's cartoon character. > > That's exactly what I look like ;) Close! Going by your avatar I see when browsing the Planet Debian blog feed. :-) In Mutt running in Gnome Terminal I see a square following the face (screenshot attached). - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Web: https://www.n0nb.us Projects: https://github.com/N0NB GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 04:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device? |
| Message-ID | <Dq6XL-6XF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #242614 |
[Multipart message β attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu 02 Dec 2021 at 05:15:26 (-0600), Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2021 02 Dec 01:07 -0600, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but > > > throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a > > > mischievous kid's cartoon character. > > > > That's exactly what I look like ;) > > Close! Going by your avatar I see when browsing the Planet Debian blog > feed. :-) > > In Mutt running in Gnome Terminal I see a square following the face > (screenshot attached). To me, that's a boy chorister (butter wouldn't meltβ¦), except that the starched ruff should be white. Sigh, more fonts β¦ :) Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web