Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #241726 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-10-27 13:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-10-27 13:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
What is libc5-i686 | lib32gcc1 (proliant package dependencies) Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> - 2021-10-27 13:00 +0200
Re: What is libc5-i686 | lib32gcc1 (proliant package dependencies) The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-10-27 13:50 +0200
| From | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-27 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | What is libc5-i686 | lib32gcc1 (proliant package dependencies) |
| Message-ID | <DcOP0-8lt-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all, I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, and doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the last dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it. I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine). libc6-i686:i386 is tagged 'rc' transitional dummy package. HP doesn't seem to be inclined to update their support packages. Should I force the install, rebuild the package with a different DEBIAN/control, or something else? BTW, is the latter option just dpkg-deb -R followed by dpkg-deb -b? Thanks for any hint Ale --
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-27 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <DcPBn-oO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #241726 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2021-10-27 at 06:57, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, > and doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the > last dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it. > > I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine). > libc6-i686:i386 is tagged 'rc' transitional dummy package. libc6, or libc5? The Subject line says the latter, but AFAIK the latter hasn't been a thing for Quite A Long While Now (if indeed at all). What version? On my system (tracking testing+stable), libc6:i386 is available at versions 2.32-4 and 2.31-13+deb11u2, and neither one of them is a transitional or a dummy package. I check with 'apt-cache policy libc6:i386' and then 'apt-cache show libc6:i386'. The 'rc' tag, as reported by e.g. 'dpkg -l', indicates "this package used to be installed, but it's been removed, although its configuration files have been left behind". I believe the 'r' stands for 'removed' and the 'c' for 'config-files' or similar. So, if that's what you have showing, then you don't actually have this package installed at the moment. It seems possible that this might have been what changed during the dist-upgrade you mentioned. > HP doesn't seem to be inclined to update their support packages. > Should I force the install, rebuild the package with a different > DEBIAN/control, or something else? If the dependencies actually list a package and version that aren't available, for something as fundamental as the C library, I wouldn't expect any good results from overriding the dependencies like that; there might well be an actual incompatibility, such that at best you'd get an installed program that wouldn't run. > BTW, is the latter option just dpkg-deb -R followed by dpkg-deb -b? That I don't know. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web