Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #244257 > unrolled thread

Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian

Started bylocal10 <local10@tutanota.com>
First post2022-01-21 11:00 +0100
Last post2022-01-21 20:40 +0100
Articles 6 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-21 11:00 +0100
    Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2022-01-21 11:10 +0100
      Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-21 12:10 +0100
    Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-01-21 11:20 +0100
      Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2022-01-21 17:10 +0100
        Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian P J <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 20:40 +0100

#244257 — Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian

Fromlocal10 <local10@tutanota.com>
Date2022-01-21 11:00 +0100
SubjectRe: Future of "his" packages in Debian
Message-ID<DHYS6-4NM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Jan 20, 2022, 22:09 by piorunz@gmx.com:

> On 20/01/2022 18:17, Marco Valli wrote:
>
>>> by Norbert Preining · 2022/01/14
>>>
>>> After having been (again) demoted (blah)
>>> based on flimsy arguments, I have been forced to rethink the level
>>> of contribution I want to do for Debian. Blah blah blah blah
>>> [...]
>>>


Can someone post what Norbert Preining actually wrote without omissions and rather frivolous additions by other parties?

Regards,

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#244259

FromBrad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
Date2022-01-21 11:10 +0100
Message-ID<DHZ1M-56t-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#244257

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:58:15 +0100 (CET)
local10 <local10@tutanota.com> wrote:

Hello local10,

>Jan 20, 2022, 22:09 by piorunz@gmx.com:
>Can someone post what Norbert Preining actually wrote without omissions
>and rather frivolous additions by other parties?

Can be found here;

https://www.preining.info/blog/2022/01/future-of-my-packages-in-debian/

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )      "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent"
        / _)rad   "Is it only me that has a working delete key?"
Do you want to play?
Play With Me - Extreme

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#244262

Fromlocal10 <local10@tutanota.com>
Date2022-01-21 12:10 +0100
Message-ID<DHZXQ-5FE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#244259
Jan 21, 2022, 10:09 by brad@fineby.me.uk:

> Can be found here;
>
> https://www.preining.info/blog/2022/01/future-of-my-packages-in-debian/
>


As a KDE user I find the news regretful. Really puzzled as to what he actually said to warrant this kind of reaction (assuming it was warranted) and why people would be so eager to demote a long time contributor like that. Anyhow, hope everything will work out for the best for all parties involved.

Thanks to everyone who responded.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#244260

From"Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
Date2022-01-21 11:20 +0100
Message-ID<DHZbr-59M-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#244257
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:58:15AM +0100, local10 wrote:
> Jan 20, 2022, 22:09 by piorunz@gmx.com:
> 
> > On 20/01/2022 18:17, Marco Valli wrote:
> >
> >>> by Norbert Preining · 2022/01/14
> >>>
> >>> After having been (again) demoted (blah)
> >>> based on flimsy arguments, I have been forced to rethink the level
> >>> of contribution I want to do for Debian. Blah blah blah blah
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> 
> 
> Can someone post what Norbert Preining actually wrote without omissions and rather frivolous additions by other parties?
> 
> Regards,
>

>From Norbert's blog, aggregated on Planet Debian:

https://www.preining.info/blog/2022/01/future-of-my-packages-in-debian/

With every good wish, as ever,

Andrew Cater 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#244277

FromCurt <curty@free.fr>
Date2022-01-21 17:10 +0100
Message-ID<DI4Ea-4Q-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#244260
On 2022-01-21, Andrew M.A. Cater <amacater@einval.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Can someone post what Norbert Preining actually wrote without omissions and rather frivolous additions by other parties?
>> 
>> Regards,
>>
>
>>From Norbert's blog, aggregated on Planet Debian:
>
> https://www.preining.info/blog/2022/01/future-of-my-packages-in-debian/
>
> With every good wish, as ever,
>
> Andrew Cater 
>
>

If only he had the Internet to look these things up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#244288

FromP J <reyadmin@gmail.com>
Date2022-01-21 20:40 +0100
Message-ID<DI7Vn-1Wl-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#244277

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 8:05 AM Curt <curty@free.fr> wrote:

> On 2022-01-21, Andrew M.A. Cater <amacater@einval.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Can someone post what Norbert Preining actually wrote without omissions
> and rather frivolous additions by other parties?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >
> >>From Norbert's blog, aggregated on Planet Debian:
> >
> > https://www.preining.info/blog/2022/01/future-of-my-packages-in-debian/
> >
> > With every good wish, as ever,
> >
> > Andrew Cater
> >
> >
>
> If only he had the Internet to look these things up.


Information is available and so so many wants to be spoon fed.  People have
to learn to help themselves.

>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web