Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #243587 > unrolled thread

brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it.

Started bygene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
First post2022-01-03 00:00 +0100
Last post2022-01-04 08:10 +0100
Articles 1 on this page of 21 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 00:00 +0100
    Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 00:10 +0100
      Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 02:30 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2022-01-03 03:00 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 03:20 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 11:30 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2022-01-04 15:00 +0100
            Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 15:20 +0100
            Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 19:30 +0100
    Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 04:00 +0100
      Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 04:40 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 04:50 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 10:40 +0100
            Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-01-03 17:00 +0100
            Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 22:50 +0100
              Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-04 01:30 +0100
    Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmengual@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 04:00 +0100
      [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 04:50 +0100
        Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2022-01-03 08:10 +0100
          Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 10:50 +0100
            Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Tom Dial <tddial@comcast.net> - 2022-01-04 08:10 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#243674 — Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it.

FromTom Dial <tddial@comcast.net>
Date2022-01-04 08:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it.
Message-ID<DBM7f-2k3-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#243624

On 1/3/22 02:46, gene heskett wrote:
> On Monday, January 3, 2022 1:59:56 AM EST john doe wrote:
...

>>
>> It would be nice if you could replicate the issue and file a bug report
>> against the Debian Installer with the D-I logs.
> 
> I appreciate that, but that means I'd have to do a complete re-install from 
> scratch, something I had to do 7 times already as its a full day per install 
> even when most of the storage is now SSD's in raid10 configs. The latest 
> generation of shingled spinning rust is a disaster looking for a place to 
> happen.  And that's just the bare metal install, nowhere near a working 
> system. To redo this system to the state its in now would take around a 
> week. And I still haven't gotten my web page working.

I think that if you did not purposely excise /var/log/installer/* the files should still be available. That is the case with my systems that were installed from media, some dating to 2006 (or likely earlier; I only checked three).

Regards,
Tom Dial

> 
>> John Doe
> 
> Cheers John, Gene Heskett.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web