Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #235468 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-05-23 19:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-05-24 19:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-05-23 19:30 +0200
Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2021-05-23 21:40 +0200
Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-05-24 12:10 +0200
Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-05-24 19:30 +0200
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-23 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.) |
| Message-ID | <Ci05k-6FW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which > is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for > the package), I've never had difficulty with its command-line interface > (in point of fact, I usually just 'qiv filename' and don't worry about > the options), and I don't recall having ever found an image file of any > format that it can't open. > > I'd be curious to know what it is about the xv command-line interface > that you find so notably simple, especially if in fact the qiv > command-line interface does not turn out to share that quality. When I wanted a quick, lightweight image viewer I setted on sxiv. I also wanted to print from the viewer and sxiv gives me that facilty. My recollection is neither qiv nor feh gave me that. Maybe I didn't look hard enough. -- Brian.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-23 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ci278-7Qf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #235468 |
Brian wrote: >On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: >> I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which >> is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for >> the package), I've never had difficulty with its command-line interface >> (in point of fact, I usually just 'qiv filename' and don't worry about >> the options), and I don't recall having ever found an image file of any >> format that it can't open. >> >> I'd be curious to know what it is about the xv command-line interface >> that you find so notably simple, especially if in fact the qiv >> command-line interface does not turn out to share that quality. > >When I wanted a quick, lightweight image viewer I setted on sxiv. I >also wanted to print from the viewer and sxiv gives me that facilty. >My recollection is neither qiv nor feh gave me that. Maybe I didn't >look hard enough. Aha! Thanks for the suggestion! I've been looking for years for a replacement for xv myself. I've been playing with each of the things suggested here, but with no joy. Finally, I think sxiv looks like a winner! :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs." -- Mike Andrews
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-24 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CifH3-7Zs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #235476 |
On 2021-05-23, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote: >> >>When I wanted a quick, lightweight image viewer I setted on sxiv. I >>also wanted to print from the viewer and sxiv gives me that facilty. >>My recollection is neither qiv nor feh gave me that. Maybe I didn't >>look hard enough. > > Aha! Thanks for the suggestion! I've been looking for years for a > replacement for xv myself. I've been playing with each of the things > suggested here, but with no joy. Finally, I think sxiv looks like a > winner! :-) I've been using mupdf recently as an image viewer, which is fast. It doesn't print, though. But you can't have everything, and anyway, printing images is so *20th* century.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-24 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CimyR-3D3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #235483 |
> printing images is so *20th* century.
^
2D
-- Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web