Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #235079 > unrolled thread

How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V

Started byzhangjialing <zhangjialing@loongson.cn>
First post2021-05-11 06:00 +0200
Last post2021-05-12 08:10 +0200
Articles 6 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V zhangjialing <zhangjialing@loongson.cn> - 2021-05-11 06:00 +0200
    Re: How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-05-11 09:10 +0200
      Re: How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-05-11 14:40 +0200
        Re: How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2021-05-11 21:40 +0200
          Re: How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V ellanios82 <ellanios82@gmail.com> - 2021-05-11 22:30 +0200
            Re: How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-05-12 08:10 +0200

#235079 — How to commit a new architecture like RISC-V

Fromzhangjialing <zhangjialing@loongson.cn>
Date2021-05-11 06:00 +0200
SubjectHow to commit a new architecture like RISC-V
Message-ID<CdrIR-3TL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     We have a new architecture , We have compiled a lot of packages . 
Now the system can work normally .

     We want to submit to debian like RISC-V. Please What documents (or 
others) can we refer to.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#235082

From<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date2021-05-11 09:10 +0200
Message-ID<CduGJ-5WB-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#235079

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:28:13AM +0800, zhangjialing wrote:
>     We have a new architecture , We have compiled a lot of packages
> . Now the system can work normally .

This sounds exciting :-)

>     We want to submit to debian like RISC-V. Please What documents
> (or others) can we refer to.

You landed on the Debian user mailing list. While there are perhaps
people around who can give you better hints, I think there are other
mailing lists where you could find more capable people for what you
have in mind.

Perhaps your new architecture is similar to one already existent
and for which a porting effort is already underway (for example,
MIPS). You find all the architecture-specific Debian mailing lists
here:

  https://lists.debian.org/ports.html

In that case it would be a good thing to say "hello" on the relevant
list.

For general questions on Debian development (e.g. how to go about a
new port etc), perhaps you find good advice in debian-devel:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/

Find general information about Debian ports here:

  https://www.debian.org/ports/

and on architecture specific things here:

  https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo

Perhaps you already know one or more of those resources. Sorry for
that. I'm not an expert on those things, but if I could help to
point you in the right direction, I'm happy.

Cheers
 - t

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#235090

Fromtomas@tuxteam.de
Date2021-05-11 14:40 +0200
Message-ID<CdzQ5-ug-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#235082

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:32:23PM +0800, zhangjialing wrote:
> Hello, thank you for your help .

Sorry it couldn't be better :)

(Please, keep the mailing list in copy: for one, there are
many more knowledgeable people here who could help, and then
our conversation is archived, to the benefit of others who
might have similar questions).

> It is a realy new architecture, I want to know the submission
> process and documents.I know RISC-V has done it ,but I do not know
> how to begain  and what can referance.

As I said, I'm just a lowly user. I don't think there is a formal
process to "start a new architecture" in Debian. Perhaps it's just
a matter of finding enough people with interest.

Debian advances by "doing" and convincing other people. So a good
starting point would be to write a bit about your new architecture,
how it differs from others (or how it is related to others) and
perhaps more details on how your porting efforts went so-far.

But I'm sure you will receive much better-founded answer by trying
on <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>

Cheers and thanks
-- tomás

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#235107

FromLiam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com>
Date2021-05-11 21:40 +0200
Message-ID<CdGoy-4qG-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#235090
On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> As I said, I'm just a lowly user.

On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining user. :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#235108

Fromellanios82 <ellanios82@gmail.com>
Date2021-05-11 22:30 +0200
Message-ID<CdHaV-4VI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#235107
On 5/11/21 10:39 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> As I said, I'm just a lowly user.
> On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining user. :-)
>
  +1

....

  thank you tomas

.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#235111

From<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date2021-05-12 08:10 +0200
Message-ID<CdQee-28e-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#235108

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:27:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
> On 5/11/21 10:39 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>As I said, I'm just a lowly user.
> >On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining user. :-)
> >
>  +1

(*blush*)

Thanks
 - t

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web