Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #234783 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-05-04 08:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-05-04 14:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
IPFS tools not in the repos? Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-05-04 08:30 +0200
Re: IPFS tools not in the repos? Alex Mestiashvili <amestia@rsh2.donotuse.de> - 2021-05-04 08:50 +0200
Re: IPFS tools not in the repos? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 13:50 +0200
Re: IPFS tools not in the repos? Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-05-04 14:10 +0200
Re: IPFS tools not in the repos? Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-05-04 14:40 +0200
| From | Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-04 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | IPFS tools not in the repos? |
| Message-ID | <CaWJb-7pv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Uhm... why aren't the IPFS tools in the Debian repos? Very interesting stuff! https://ipfs.io/ -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alex Mestiashvili <amestia@rsh2.donotuse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-04 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CaX2y-7vR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #234783 |
On 5/4/21 8:19 AM, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Uhm... why aren't the IPFS tools in the Debian repos? > > Very interesting stuff! > > https://ipfs.io/ > Well, most likely because nobody found it useful enough and also because it is go and js based which are not really friendly for packaging with their tendency to introduce the dependency hell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-04 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Cb1IR-1Qu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #234784 |
On Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:57 +0200 Alex Mestiashvili <amestia@rsh2.donotuse.de> wrote: > On 5/4/21 8:19 AM, Emanuel Berg wrote: > > Uhm... why aren't the IPFS tools in the Debian repos? > > > > Very interesting stuff! > > > > https://ipfs.io/ > > > > Well, most likely because nobody found it useful enough and also because > it is go and js based which are not really friendly for packaging with > their tendency to introduce the dependency hell. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779893 Celejar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Cb22d-2ce-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #234800 |
Celejar wrote: >>> Uhm... why aren't the IPFS tools in the Debian repos? >>> >>> Very interesting stuff! >>> >>> https://ipfs.io/ >>> >> >> Well, most likely because nobody found it useful enough and >> also because it is go and js based which are not really >> friendly for packaging with their tendency to introduce the >> dependency hell. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779893 Oh, OK, so it is Go. Well, thank you for explaining! http://www.yts.ge/movies/go-1999.html -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-04 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Cb2vg-2ll-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #234801 |
>>> Well, most likely because nobody found it useful enough
>>> and also because it is go and js based which are not
>>> really friendly for packaging with their tendency to
>>> introduce the dependency hell.
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779893
>
> Oh, OK, so it is Go.
>
> Well, thank you for explaining!
I told a friend and he said:
Thats why this way of Debian for solving language package
dependencies is so cursed, Gentoo does the same.
I think they know, it was brought to light on lwn not so
long ago: https://lwn.net/Articles/835599/
?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web