Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #239592 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-02 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Re: icewm anomaly after bullseye upgrade Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2021-09-02 22:10 +0200
Re: icewm anomaly after bullseye upgrade Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2021-09-03 09:50 +0200
Re: icewm anomaly after bullseye upgrade Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2021-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: icewm anomaly after bullseye upgrade "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200
| From | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-02 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: icewm anomaly after bullseye upgrade |
| Message-ID | <CT1c6-3tM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Thanks to those who chimed in! My focus today is on those lines in ~/.icewm/preferences that specify fonts for the task bar. I have in mind such statements as: NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="DejaVuSans-Bold,sans-serif:size=18" ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft="DejaVuSans-Bold,sans-serif:size=18" I suspect the syntax of my lines does not represent actual fonts that are available on this machine. Can anyone provide a critique of that syntax? -- ...a society must incorporate the rationalizing power symbolized by scientific knowledge, for otherwise it will be a fatally split society- split between a powerful elite and the disenfranchised mass. To this we add now: an irrational elite is the most dangerous of all. Holton, Gerald. 1985. On the Integrity of Science: The Issues Since Bronowski. Leonardo 18 (4), Special Issue: Jacob Bronowski: A Retrospective (1985): 229-232.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-03 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CTc7v-2g9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239592 |
Hi, On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:02:08 -0400 (EDT) Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> wrote: > Thanks to those who chimed in! > > My focus today is on those lines in ~/.icewm/preferences that > specify fonts for the task bar. I have in mind such statements > as: > > NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="DejaVuSans-Bold,sans-serif:size=18" > ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft="DejaVuSans-Bold,sans-serif:size=18" > > I suspect the syntax of my lines does not represent actual fonts > that are available on this machine. > > Can anyone provide a critique of that syntax? according to https://ice-wm.org/man/icewm-preferences the syntax for using a bold font should rather be: ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft=”sans-serif:size=12:bold” . That comma-separated font list thing does not seem to work (at least not with the IceWM version from Buster); since I suspect that "DejaVuSans" and "sans-serif" might be equivalent here, I tried with a different font here: NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="Akkadian,sans-serif:size=11:bold" This gives me the Akkadian font with normal (or medium) weight. Changing the first font name to one that does not exist, like NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="Akadian,sans-serif:size=11:bold" gives me a normal weight default/fallback font. Likewise NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="Akkadian:size=11:bold,sans-serif:size=11:bold" resp. NormalTaskBarFontNameXft="Akadian:size=11:bold,sans-serif:size=11:bold" gives me a bold Akkadian font resp. that same normal weight default fallback font as above. I have some doubt though, that this has anything to do with your original problem. Best regards Michael .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. It is necessary to have purpose. -- Alice #1, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-04 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CTwSC-7ra-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239609 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Michael Lange wrote:
> according to https://ice-wm.org/man/icewm-preferences the
> syntax for using a bold font should rather be:
> ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft=”sans-serif:size=12:bold” .
Ah. RTFM still applies.
That did the trick for me. Thank You Sir!
> I have some doubt though, that this has anything to do with
> your original problem.
That is correct. I did resolve my problem with 'WorkspaceNames='
not governing the number of workspaces shown on the Taskbar,
but my error was so stupid I am ashamed to reveal it here in
front of everyone, and probably won't even tell anyone off-list.
As a rule I am not above posting really dumb questions (no
wisecracks, thank you), but that one was beyond anything even I
could suffer.
Thanks to all the assembled faithful as per usual.
--
What is the significance of the fact that "abstractions" and
"generalizations" and the very concepts of "time" and "space"
occur only in conjunction with a human nervous system?
Percy W. Bridgman (1955)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CTA9P-1dG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239661 |
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:58:41AM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Michael Lange wrote: > > > according to https://ice-wm.org/man/icewm-preferences the syntax for > > using a bold font should rather be: > > > ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft=”sans-serif:size=12:bold” . > > Ah. RTFM still applies. > > That did the trick for me. Thank You Sir! > > > I have some doubt though, that this has anything to do with your > > original problem. > > That is correct. I did resolve my problem with 'WorkspaceNames=' not > governing the number of workspaces shown on the Taskbar, but my error was so > stupid I am ashamed to reveal it here in front of everyone, and probably > won't even tell anyone off-list. > > As a rule I am not above posting really dumb questions (no wisecracks, thank > you), but that one was beyond anything even I could suffer. No dumb questions ever. After 23 years around Debian, I still find the best and quickest way to find an error is to stare at it for three days, ask someone else to look at it - and they find it in 30 seconds. Smart wisecrack answers / demeaning someone else's efforts (always provided they show they've done something) - that's another thing. It's very worthwhile to think we have all sorts of people with all sorts of experience and expertise lurking here and that somebody will know the answer / direct you to resources to find it / have an "Aha!" moment and sort out their own puzzle when they see you raise it. All best, as ever, Andy Cater
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web